I disagree with this rationale. W limited rosters, there is less room for those that will never contribute on the field and less transfer potential because schools can’t just expand rosters. Transfers are down, not up, this past offseason. My sons college team has cut kids who don’t play and aren’t improving to get to 48. Everyone is there to compete…not just “happy to be there”. That sounds like a statement from someone who has no idea how a college athletics program is run. Only a fat donation will save anyone, no matter the grades, from getting cut if you can’t play at the necessary level. |
You can’t argue with success. Unless your son’s school is Notre Dame, Cornell, or one or two others. I would say that Duke has it figured out better than they do. |
| Potomac middie would easily start for SJC. He's got elite speed and stick. Duke isn't a pay-to-play program. And as brilliant as homers on DCUM may be, Duke coaching staff has better eye for talent. Kid earned it. |
100% The SJC homers are on here make military road sound like a toxic HS program |
You are actually agreeing by saying the bottom kids don't play. They've just lopped off the non-performing athletic and academic students who aren't contributing on or off the field. The great thing is those kids get to stay at the school. The kids from about about 25 - 48 will stand around and cheer and get to be practice players while getting an education and probably getting a significant amount of financial support so long as the school opted in and so long as their grades are good. If a player was cut from 48-55, no one wants him in the portal anyway. |
He was a second line middle on his club team, w two SJC middies on the top line, who both were far better than him. On top of that, he wouldn't start ahead of the 27 Penn State commit. This isn't conjecture, as that is the most likely starting middle line for SJC. Lastly, the kid is a nice kid, so we are only talking about talent level, but to say he is elite in anything just proves you've never watched him play. He is a zero star middie by IL (not DCUM), and although those rankings aren't everything, zero stars is zero stars for a reason. It's not like we are arguing between a 3 and 4 star here. |
The 2nd line middie at NL is going to Penn. So does that reinforce coaches know more or does he stink too? |
| How many stars was Rob Pannel? |
I think the point that was being made is that he wouldn't start at SJC, not a club team. He was probably the 5th best middie on DCE 26, tbh. And Penn isn't Duke, let's be real. I have seen the kid play aa number of times s well, and I think he made the wise decision (lacrosse wise) staying at Potomac vs going to a wcac or iac school. |
|
Clearly the the Duke coaching staff sees something in this young man than the club lax guru on this thread doesn't see. I'll take my chances on the Duke coaching staff.
I saw SJC play plenty of times last year, they weren't good especially on the offensive side of the field. From Former D1 player |
To be fair…There’s always a first time for a program like Duke to grab a lightly recruited, no star middie from a small, academic oriented school right in the middle of recruiting the following years crop of studs.The Duke staff must have been pondering this for months and months. |
|
He committed to Navy last summer shortly after July 1, and then switched to Duke, and who knows how many other schools pursued him once he came back on the market, so that’s not exactly lightly recruited.
Trust me, the Duke coaches know more than you do. |
Trust you? Why should we? He actually committed to Navy in Sept, after the 1st once he saw who was/wasn’t intetested in him. And I’ll trust what I saw live and where his coaches who see him all summer played him. |
So you’re a better judge of lacrosse talent than the coaching staffs at both Navy and Duke. Okay, got it. |
|
FACT: Potomac middie is headed to Duke.
OPINION: He couldn't hypothetically start at SJC. SELF-OWN: If SJC's Bucknell and Utah middie commits really are superior talents that implies SJC does inferior job supporting their kids' recruitment. As you point out, they all play for same club. OUTCOME: Hopefully all these kids landed at school that's right for them. But Potomac kid clearly got the most desirable outcome. Some parents are jealous and embarrassing themselves on here claiming to be better talent evaluators than Duke coaching staff. |