EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

https://www.etonline.com/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitts-talented-daughter-shiloh-doesnt-rely-on-her-famous-name-source-says

Her dance teacher linked to her account as does the article. It's @sh1lohj. I don't even think they hate him like that since they see his family. He hurt them, lied about it (because this was obviously not a simple parent/kid argument), and they rather not associate with him too much. Fair. Gary Owen recently came out said his kids are estranged from him for cheating and not being a good father/partner yet people are still blaming his ex for "planting bad seeds" come on now!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

https://www.etonline.com/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitts-talented-daughter-shiloh-doesnt-rely-on-her-famous-name-source-says

Her dance teacher linked to her account as does the article. It's @sh1lohj. I don't even think they hate him like that since they see his family. He hurt them, lied about it (because this was obviously not a simple parent/kid argument), and they rather not associate with him too much. Fair. Gary Owen recently came out said his kids are estranged from him for cheating and not being a good father/partner yet people are still blaming his ex for "planting bad seeds" come on now!

Fwiw, Jolie was criticized as a bad mom before the plane incidents and the epically scorched earth divorce for the children's unconventional, unschooling, no-rules upbringing. At the time international adoptions were relatively acceptable although even then there were problems and increasing restrictions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

https://www.etonline.com/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitts-talented-daughter-shiloh-doesnt-rely-on-her-famous-name-source-says

Her dance teacher linked to her account as does the article. It's @sh1lohj. I don't even think they hate him like that since they see his family. He hurt them, lied about it (because this was obviously not a simple parent/kid argument), and they rather not associate with him too much. Fair. Gary Owen recently came out said his kids are estranged from him for cheating and not being a good father/partner yet people are still blaming his ex for "planting bad seeds" come on now!

Fwiw, Jolie was criticized as a bad mom before the plane incidents and the epically scorched earth divorce for the children's unconventional, unschooling, no-rules upbringing. At the time international adoptions were relatively acceptable although even then there were problems and increasing restrictions.

I don't know what this has to do with anything that I said. They aren't out here publicly acting like the barkers or other fame hungry nepo kids. All this is showing me is women can't win no matter what as in the case of Gary Owen's ex wife. I didn't even say anything about adoptions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:x100 re women supporting these guys. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE

The obsession with making sure no one thinks bad thoughts about their precious icons is exactly what has allowed so much terrible seedy behavior to thrive in entertainment. The whole Depp thing ASTOUNDED me.

You’re the one who seems obsessed with ensuring no one has any bad words to say about your own precious icons.

Jolie is not a woman who stands with other woman. She is a predatory woman known for breaking up multiple marriages and engagements.

She is a woman known for checking into mental institutions and hiring hit men to kill her. She is not well mentally. I don’t think Brad is perfect, but he’s proven to be a far better person than her through out the course of most of his life. She keeps making and expanding on the same claims that have already been debunked by law enforcement agencies. She’s done this constantly for eight years in order to further her campaign to destroy Brad’s reputation and career, and alienate him from his children, and take his winery away from him. She is a vengeful woman who cannot move on and will not be happy until Brad is completely destroyed.

I didn't say anything about her, you put words into my mouth (keyboard) that were not there. HIS actions are abhorrent. I have a different more nuanced opinion of her but it is really irrelevant to what I think about him. And I used to LOVE Brad Pitt, it took me a LONG time to have the luster of years of fandom come off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the truth likely to be somewhere in the middle? He was an abusive drunk (seems clear!) and she's a pretty good mom overall but really was nasty in deliberately alienating the children from him after he became clean and tried to make amends with them.

I generally agree with this but also think he felt entitled to her monetary investment in Miraval. After what he did to their family, he should have made her a very generous offer to buy her out, and quickly. She just wanted financial independence at that time. His unwillingness smacks of coercive control.
My opinion is that both sides sucked in this scenario, but that he was the worst. And the kids know it.

She didn’t buy it, he did. He gave her 49 or 50% as a wedding gift.


Well, I think this is exactly what we don't quite know, the dynamics of the Miraval sale. I'm sure she wanted initial investment plus profit. But he had invested all the sweat equity plus more financial capital. Bet it was difficult to come to terms on how much profit on her initial investment she was entitled to in that kind of murky scenario. So could they not agree, did he drag his feet when she wanted a quick payout, was it really about the NDA? I can't imagine that don't have plenty of documents on both sides to help establish the truth of what happened. His NDA arguments seem spurious, unless he can establish the NDA he requested was a standard business one that did not extend to their personal lives. Then again, with them, where could you draw the line between the personal and professional in terms of non-disparagement when there was so much overlap due to their family "brand"? Seems very messy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the truth likely to be somewhere in the middle? He was an abusive drunk (seems clear!) and she's a pretty good mom overall but really was nasty in deliberately alienating the children from him after he became clean and tried to make amends with them.

I generally agree with this but also think he felt entitled to her monetary investment in Miraval. After what he did to their family, he should have made her a very generous offer to buy her out, and quickly. She just wanted financial independence at that time. His unwillingness smacks of coercive control.
My opinion is that both sides sucked in this scenario, but that he was the worst. And the kids know it.

Well, I think this is exactly what we don't quite know, the dynamics of the Miraval sale. I'm sure she wanted initial investment plus profit. But he had invested all the sweat equity plus more financial capital. Bet it was difficult to come to terms on how much profit on her initial investment she was entitled to in that kind of murky scenario. So could they not agree, did he drag his feet when she wanted a quick payout, was it really about the NDA? I can't imagine that don't have plenty of documents on both sides to help establish the truth of what happened. His NDA arguments seem spurious, unless he can establish the NDA he requested was a standard business one that did not extend to their personal lives. Then again, with them, where could you draw the line between the personal and professional in terms of non-disparagement when there was so much overlap due to their family "brand"? Seems very messy.

She didn’t buy it, he did. He gave her 49 or 50% as a wedding gift.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:x100 re women supporting these guys. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE

The obsession with making sure no one thinks bad thoughts about their precious icons is exactly what has allowed so much terrible seedy behavior to thrive in entertainment. The whole Depp thing ASTOUNDED me.

You’re the one who seems obsessed with ensuring no one has any bad words to say about your own precious icons.

Jolie is not a woman who stands with other woman. She is a predatory woman known for breaking up multiple marriages and engagements.

She is a woman known for checking into mental institutions and hiring hit men to kill her. She is not well mentally. I don’t think Brad is perfect, but he’s proven to be a far better person than her through out the course of most of his life. She keeps making and expanding on the same claims that have already been debunked by law enforcement agencies. She’s done this constantly for eight years in order to further her campaign to destroy Brad’s reputation and career, and alienate him from his children, and take his winery away from him. She is a vengeful woman who cannot move on and will not be happy until Brad is completely destroyed.

I don’t get the alienation of all the children claim. The older kids were old enough to witness and experience the behavior without any input from Jolie and they made independent decisions based on their experiences. If the older children wanted contact with Brad, they were old enough to make that happen with or without Jolie. I don’t think a parent should ever make a child be in the presence of an abusive parent just because a court says such parent has visitation.

The judge warned her early in divorce proceedings about parent alienation. I believe she wouldn’t let him talk to them on the phone.

Plus at this point can you believe what the kids claim? She could have repeated it so many times the kids now believe it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the truth likely to be somewhere in the middle? He was an abusive drunk (seems clear!) and she's a pretty good mom overall but really was nasty in deliberately alienating the children from him after he became clean and tried to make amends with them.

I generally agree with this but also think he felt entitled to her monetary investment in Miraval. After what he did to their family, he should have made her a very generous offer to buy her out, and quickly. She just wanted financial independence at that time. His unwillingness smacks of coercive control.
My opinion is that both sides sucked in this scenario, but that he was the worst. And the kids know it.

Agreed. I saw shiloh's personal account got leaked. Not one mention of Brad or Pitt anywhere.

Probably because it’s not her account.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

https://www.etonline.com/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitts-talented-daughter-shiloh-doesnt-rely-on-her-famous-name-source-says

Her dance teacher linked to her account as does the article. It's @sh1lohj. I don't even think they hate him like that since they see his family. He hurt them, lied about it (because this was obviously not a simple parent/kid argument), and they rather not associate with him too much. Fair. Gary Owen recently came out said his kids are estranged from him for cheating and not being a good father/partner yet people are still blaming his ex for "planting bad seeds" come on now!

Taraji P. Henson leaked it in the Talk that Brad and Jolie had an open marriage.

Almost all celebs marriages end due to cheating.

Kids should be over “all” of it by now unless mom is always crying and saying awful things about him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:x100 re women supporting these guys. MAKE IT MAKE SENSE

The obsession with making sure no one thinks bad thoughts about their precious icons is exactly what has allowed so much terrible seedy behavior to thrive in entertainment. The whole Depp thing ASTOUNDED me.

You’re the one who seems obsessed with ensuring no one has any bad words to say about your own precious icons.

Jolie is not a woman who stands with other woman. She is a predatory woman known for breaking up multiple marriages and engagements.

She is a woman known for checking into mental institutions and hiring hit men to kill her. She is not well mentally. I don’t think Brad is perfect, but he’s proven to be a far better person than her through out the course of most of his life. She keeps making and expanding on the same claims that have already been debunked by law enforcement agencies. She’s done this constantly for eight years in order to further her campaign to destroy Brad’s reputation and career, and alienate him from his children, and take his winery away from him. She is a vengeful woman who cannot move on and will not be happy until Brad is completely destroyed.

I didn't say anything about her, you put words into my mouth (keyboard) that were not there. HIS actions are abhorrent. I have a different more nuanced opinion of her but it is really irrelevant to what I think about him. And I used to LOVE Brad Pitt, it took me a LONG time to have the luster of years of fandom come off.

The FBI found no reason to charge him. From the released FBI report, she jumped on his back cause she THOUGHT he was going after the kid. I suspect he tussled with her, the kids tried to separate them and he fell backwards. I suspect during the tussle both Pitt and Jolie probably ended up hitting one or some of the kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the truth likely to be somewhere in the middle? He was an abusive drunk (seems clear!) and she's a pretty good mom overall but really was nasty in deliberately alienating the children from him after he became clean and tried to make amends with them.

I generally agree with this but also think he felt entitled to her monetary investment in Miraval. After what he did to their family, he should have made her a very generous offer to buy her out, and quickly. She just wanted financial independence at that time. His unwillingness smacks of coercive control.
My opinion is that both sides sucked in this scenario, but that he was the worst. And the kids know it.

Agreed. I saw shiloh's personal account got leaked. Not one mention of Brad or Pitt anywhere.

Probably because it’s not her account.

It is her account 100%. Her friends tag it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

We don’t know he tried to change NDA, that’s her claim. Probably why the judge wants to see all her NDA’s. She, or they, may have the same conditions set in her NDA’s thus she shouldn’t have been surprised by his.

He admitted he changed it.... they both provided the back and forth with trying to change it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13427653/amp/Angelina-Jolie-told-hand-staff-NDAs-judge-sides-Brad-Pitt-Miraval-wine-court-battle.html

The judge will order Jolie to give Brad her past NDAs.

Jolie has no legal case, just misdirection. She is attempting to turn a contract dispute into a venue to relitigate her abuse claims that have already been dismissed by the FBI and Los Angeles Child and Family Services department. She started negotiating with the Russian oligarch she sold the winery to during discussions with Brad. She sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay her more money and to spite Brad. She is attempting misdirection by bringing a standard NDA like she has signed and had others sign dozens of times into the discussion - so she can turn the court case into a venue to rehash and exaggerate the same tired claims she has been making for years.

you write “she sold to the Russian oligarch because he would pay more money “. Everything you wrote is irrelevant. Why should she accept less money. No rational person would. She owes Pitt nothing. He should have matched the oligarchs price.

Although I agree with this, the problem is that she didn't give him the opportunity. It was a covert sale. As much as she didn't owe him anything, the decent thing to do would have been to give him a chance to match the offer. I think she wanted to screw him, and ensure he was subjected to a hated partner because at that moment it didn't look the custody proceedings were going her way. Although I think he did plenty to earn her anger, I don't think she handled it fairly or well. A swift "match this offer or else" in a short timeframe would have sufficed. She wanted him to suffer, it's completely clear. But it may turn out legally she had the right to handle it however she wanted.

Yes, I feel like there is a lot of obfuscation on both sides. Was she legally entitled to make a covert sale or not? I'm guessing she was. It's his stupid fault if he hadn't sufficiently protected himself in the event of a future split. I mean, what a dumb@ss.

Yeah I don't feel bad for him. They had an agreed upon deal and then he tried to change the NDA conditions. Then he's dumb enough to have text messages with his partners about hiding money and papers from her. Even the judge knows how dumb this case is and told them to wrap it up during the hearing. She was playing chess while he was playing checkers.

Whats shiloh account u speak of? I thought it was just pax?

https://www.etonline.com/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitts-talented-daughter-shiloh-doesnt-rely-on-her-famous-name-source-says

Her dance teacher linked to her account as does the article. It's @sh1lohj. I don't even think they hate him like that since they see his family. He hurt them, lied about it (because this was obviously not a simple parent/kid argument), and they rather not associate with him too much. Fair. Gary Owen recently came out said his kids are estranged from him for cheating and not being a good father/partner yet people are still blaming his ex for "planting bad seeds" come on now!

Taraji P. Henson leaked it in the Talk that Brad and Jolie had an open marriage.

Almost all celebs marriages end due to cheating.

Kids should be over “all” of it by now unless mom is always crying and saying awful things about him.

I never said anything about JP having an open marriage or cheating. You need to look more into how infidelity affects children. It's not something you just get over it and can have long term effects. Gary said he's the reason for the demise of his kids relationship. Yet you're still blaming his ex. Take note people. Women can never win.