Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Did you forget that someone broke into their home looking for Archie, but he was out with the nanny at the time. H&M was not with them, and the security was with H$M, not the nanny and Archie. I disagree with your assessment about the interview. They needed to bring the darkness into the light. Why do you think they need to cower in fear and go underground? And doing the interview has made more people aware of the dangers they are facing as a family. |
Anonymous
Well she would not have need to run from the paparazzi if she had security. Millions of people have survived auto accidents without seatbelts. Diana grew up at a time when seatbelts were not always required. |
Anonymous
No one is saying they can’t have security. No one. It’s just that they need to pay for it themselves. Most responsible adults pay for things themselves. It’s not unusual. You’re flat-out wrong about the interview: If your paramount concern is safety, doing controversial interviews on international TV will make it more likely not less that you will be in danger. This isn’t hard to understand. Celebrities who protect their private lives and don’t do major TV spots or stage paparazzi photos are at less risk than more exposed celebrities. (It’s absurd to suggest that H&M did the interview for safety reasons. Get real.) |
Anonymous
Not wearing a seatbelt turned out to be a bad idea, didn’t it? It’s been known for decades that safety belts save lives. If Diana somehow didn’t know that (did she think they were just for decoration?), that’s on her. Also, even celebrities with security get followed by paparazzi. Did you really not know this? And Diana was very wealthy. She and her boyfriend could have afforded as much security as they could ever desire. |
Anonymous
It’s funny how people can see and hear the same thing, but have different interpretations. Fair enough. I did not hear, nor do I see whining and complaining. They were asked a question and they provided a response. Harry was asked why he left and he explained the security thing and the harassment he felt his wife received while working on behalf of the BRF. People wanted to know about the money deals he was making because some people said they were crass. He explained why he needed the money. His family no longer had security. He asked his father to continue providing security, at least until he could afford it himself and was denied. He was made moves and deals to take care of his family. What real man would not. Of course his explanation for needing money still was not and is not good enough for many of you. I guess y’all want the Suxxess to take the Cersie Walking of Shame. Not gonna happen. I hope H$M get all the money and never have to think of asking Charles or William for help ever again. I am sure the first ask for security was difficult for a grown man to do. |
Anonymous
Well he is paying for his security for his family, and had he stayed in Britain he would not have tat opportunity to protect himself his entire family. It’s great that he left and now has that ability. As to the other, we will have to agree to disagree. I still believe that people should not have to live in fear and darkness, being it to light. Celebrities, politicians, mega business people conduct interviews everyday. Oprah has been conducting interviews of the H&Ms for decades. They were not the first. So it’s ridiculous to say that because they were interviewed they opened themselves up to more danger. That is what I call RIDICULOUS |
Anonymous
She was not flown through the window of the car. Plenty of people die with and without seatbelts. Plenty of people survive with or without seatbelts. That car was mangled. She wasn’t surviving it. The driver survived because of the airbag. |
Anonymous
Actually there was an incident when they were abroad and Archie was targeted. He had no one but the nanny. They announced their departure shortly after returning to the U.K. |
Anonymous
The interview only succeeded in making them look like entitled and whiny. |
Anonymous
He should thank his dad for turning him into an independent adult then. As long as he had handouts coming in where would be the motivation to make something of himself? Time to quit whining. |
Anonymous
| So how do they decide which paparazzi to sue when pics of Archie are published? I guess not the ones they leak on purpose (Exhibit A: last week’s pic) which is all the more reason that these two are hard to take seriously. |
Anonymous
DP. Interview = money to pay for security. Their game is the only thing they have to monetize. There is nothing special about anyone in the entire royal family. Harry didn’t even graduate from college. They can’t both fade into obscurity and “pay for things themselves.” |
Anonymous
| *fame not game |
Anonymous
| If security was the reason they left, why was their own published statement on their departure all about their complaints regarding the Royal Rota (press)? Why did they not state the actual reason they were leaving? They are trying to rewrite history and make themselves sound less greedy. |
Anonymous
Really? You think the entire global audience totaling 60+ million disapproved? I for one looked up the expected release date of their Netflix documentary! 
|