Is Matt Gaetz the next in a long line of prominent republicans to be convicted of child sex abuse?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Even Newsmax didn't want him,

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/newsmax-turned-down-embattled-republican-matt-gaetz-job-spokesperson-2021-06-07/


LOL. When you are too sleazy for even Newsmax.

Anonymous
Fellow democrats, learn from this one.

Slimy republicans rarely "do the right thing" and resign, don't cave for these people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Fellow democrats, learn from this one.

Slimy republicans rarely "do the right thing" and resign, don't cave for these people.

I see what you’re saying. My state lost a great senator (Smith is okay, but… uninspiring) to this, but if rolls were really reversed, I wouldn’t want to actually keep a pedophile rapist in our midst. Just because the GOP has zero morals and gutter standards doesn’t mean we should aspire (despire?) to their nadiral location.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Serious question: why hasn’t Gaetz been indicted yet?


Any day now!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Serious question: why hasn’t Gaetz been indicted yet?


Any day now!

There are a lot of jokes about “especially later in the summer,” but Greenberg’s sentencing is in August.
Anonymous
So how much information and/or how many people would Greenberg have had to give up in order to go from 33 charges to 6? Is this actually a meaningful lot or not so much? I’m no lawyer and know nothing about criminal law.
Anonymous
Gaetz being asked the most relevant question of the day.
Anonymous
What a dirtbag. He needs to go down for this.
Anonymous
Looks like SeekingArrangement is scrambling to hide, bury evidence and deny everything. FBI should have been in there with a forensic team to image their servers the second they made the connection.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Looks like SeekingArrangement is scrambling to hide, bury evidence and deny everything. FBI should have been in there with a forensic team to image their servers the second they made the connection.


How do you know the FBI hasn't done this?

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/23/gaetz-case-takes-bizarre-tabloid-turn-500692

“Seeking.com has no knowledge of Mr. Gaetz ever having an account on the website,” the company said in its statement.

Some defense lawyers involved in the wide-ranging case, however, speculate that the federal investigation into Gaetz has stalled for a lack of clear evidence and because of the problematic witnesses in the case: Greenberg and his former victim, who is now 21 and makes hardcore pornography.


Perhaps there is nothing to this story other than rumors of rabid liberals.
Anonymous
Lol does anyone think he actually had “Matt Gaetz” on the website? Of course not. If he was on it, he’d use an alias. Further, it was Greenberg who was active on the website. This is a red herring.

Still, he was doing ecstasy and banging hookers in hotels parties arranged by Greenberg while he was Congressman. Illegal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Lol does anyone think he actually had “Matt Gaetz” on the website? Of course not. If he was on it, he’d use an alias. Further, it was Greenberg who was active on the website. This is a red herring.

Still, he was doing ecstasy and banging hookers in hotels parties arranged by Greenberg while he was Congressman. Illegal.


Why hasn’t he been arrested then?
Anonymous
Republicans can't be counted on to do the right thing and resign.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like SeekingArrangement is scrambling to hide, bury evidence and deny everything. FBI should have been in there with a forensic team to image their servers the second they made the connection.


How do you know the FBI hasn't done this?

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/23/gaetz-case-takes-bizarre-tabloid-turn-500692

“Seeking.com has no knowledge of Mr. Gaetz ever having an account on the website,” the company said in its statement.

Some defense lawyers involved in the wide-ranging case, however, speculate that the federal investigation into Gaetz has stalled for a lack of clear evidence and because of the problematic witnesses in the case: Greenberg and his former victim, who is now 21 and makes hardcore pornography.

Perhaps there is nothing to this story other than rumors of rabid liberals.

Do you understand who their source is?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: