My kids attended a public HS (I'm not that PP). What any kid does outside of school (or in school academically) is really none of your business or your kid's business. If my kid wants to spend 15 hours each weekend working as a CNA (or volunteering at a nursing home and doing actual work) from time they are old enough, nobody needs to advertise that to you. Same if my kid wants to spend 5 hours a day practicing piano and becoming one of the best players in the USA by end of HS. It's literally none of your business. They are not hiding anything, they are just pursuing their passions. And unless you are their friend, you have no interest in knowing I'm sorry that you are so maniac that your kid doesn't have any passions, unless they check your boxes for "how to get into an Ivy" |
+1000. What my kid (or any kid) is doing outside of school is their own business. We told our kids early in life that their biggest competition was themselves - so out and win every day versus who you were yesterday and something good will happen in the end. |
Op writes, "We all were convinced that DD had it in the bag - Worst of all is that many of her classmates w/ lower stats and worse ECs have gotten into a few of these schools."
This is why so many people are finding OP insufferable. She is so critical of other students with "worse ECs". I bet those are the kids who were on students council, drama, yearbook, marching band, school sports so they didn't have as many weighted/honors/AP classes. Maybe they were taking care of a sibling or having to have paid employment. Being president of the honor club is not student leadership. Her child didn't do anything to make her school a better place. Her whole application seems like she went along checking boxes to try to get into top ranked colleges. And OP says they make between 200-400k but doesn't answer if they need financial aid. Since she didn't apply ED 1 to JHU most likely they aren't a FULL PAY family. Now add that she applied to the MOST competitive major at JHU- biomedical engineering. It's the number 1 rated program in the country. That acceptance rate a few years ago was probably only 1-2 percent. They only take 100-120 students and it is hard to transfer in. Now add that the NIH is being cut so JHU is supposedly not taking nearly the same amount of grad student. More reason to take ED 1 FULL PAY students. So OP not "worst of all" is not that many of her classmates with lower stats got in. It is that you are to shallow to think - wow, that is great at least one of my child's classmates got in so I am going to wish them the all the best. |
It's still going completely over both of your heads. No one GAF what your kids are doing in their free time. What's "maniac" about it is that you thing you are somehow above the tiger parents you have so much disdain for. You are not better than them. You ARE them. |
I also get the impression that OP is not full pay and that (along with unrealistic expectations) was likely a factor in her flawed admissions strategy. |
You can keep repeating the same tropes all day long if it make you feel better. All I know is my kid quietly kicked ass on what he cared deeply about and is now headed for Harvard in the fall. I hope your find tranquility in your path at some point. Everyone's going to be fine in the end. |
Just call her Cleopatra. |
Mine was kind of in this boat but there was not one of the 6-7 schools he saw that he loved enough to ED. Got rejected RD at several T25s, yeah, expected, but ED really is if you know you want it |
This is an idiotic take. First, Hopkins is need blind. Second, no one at Hopkins, least of all those in admissions had any clue that Trump would cut research in the way he has back in December. |
Still focusing on wrong things if still raising “unfair” 35 pages in about the other kids applications. Even to say you know SAT score tells you nothing for all the schools that allow TO, which most on OP list did this year. The post on institutional priorities is where should focus and unless glutton for punishment, then don’t focus on fact not first generation and Olympic swimmer or whatever it is that put someone else’s kid over yours. |
Yes we should force them down that path. It’s a waste of time and resources to try and prepare kids for college who don’t have the chops to be there. And yes you can know who they are on the basis of testing. |
That is exactly why we SHOULD have mandatory vo-tech tracking. Our local taxes are paying to “educate” high school kids when at least half of the kids there (and all of them in certain schools) have no business going to college. Complete waste of money. |
F-off, come on that kid is a star. Should have had better outcome. |
Something is definitely off. We know a girl (an Asian!) with similar grades/APs but lower SAT (1510) and fewer notable ECs (but captain of a HS sport) who got admitted to UVA and Chapel Hill. |
Yes, exactly. In your OP: “Worst of all is that many of her classmates w/ lower stats and worse ECs have gotten into a few of these schools.” From the jump, you are comparing her to her classmates and saying how much less deserving they are. How do you think she is going to get past that if you keep doing it? |