
That's nice. This picture was still heavily manipulated and they were wrong for putting it out. |
They just destroyed any credibility they might have had. No one is going to believe anything Kensington Palace says now.
Doesn't bode well for William as the King. |
The coverup is always worse than the crime. |
I mean, just because you were right about the photoshop doesn't mean you're not stupid for being so weird and obsessive about this, LOL! I'm literally just hear because some of you are nuts! |
I feel like they just spliced together the best faces from multiple photos - haven't you ever done that? |
No you're here because you don't like people are calling them out. You didn't believe photoshopped in the first place. |
It does! It’s like a straight line. This whole thing is insane! |
No lol |
Thats the general consensus I've been seeing. No one likes liars and manipulating photos (that includes kids of all people) is a huge No No. |
I haven’t, but I know photographers do. But, they do a MUCH better job and the pictures aren’t of future royalty. |
Agree with all of this. At the end of this, whatever that is, this whole timeline could be used as a PR case study in how not to handle crisis communications. Truly atrocious and just so, so stupid. |
Sure. But the AP/Reuters issue is that they can’t share the pictures as authentic if they aren’t. AP didn’t say people shouldn’t look at the pic, it just didn’t meet their standards upon further inspection. |
Especially since it was signed "C." on instagram. No way to blame this on a PR team gone rogue. |
I'm guessing there's metadata or other obvious reasons that prove photoshopping (in addition to the fact that they've done it before). Because AP & Reuters have put a kill on use of the photo as being manipulated. |
Kate’s zipper? I’m not seeing the issue. |