The pledged delegates would be released from their pledge and can vote for whomever they choose, same as when a candidate withdraws after winning some pledged delegates. |
Bullshit. The report gave the reasons. Hur just smeared Biden so he won’t get kicked out of the Republican patronage network. |
Exactly. What the PP does not understand is that this report is not a pleading. The Rules of Evidence do not apply. He was positing reasons for not bringing the case, and the fact that Biden’s cognitive issues would evoke sympathy from a jury is certainly one of them. The Gaslighters on this thread are so tiresome. Everyone can see with their eyes that he is a man of diminished capacity. |
DP. "Smeared Biden"? Hur told the truth - what did you expect? Also, you should be grateful. Biden’s mental frailty is one reason Hur offered for not presenting Biden’s document-mishandling as a criminal offense before a jury. Look, decline is part of the human condition, and it’s not Biden’s fault. But what IS his fault is insisting that he can capably serve another four years as president. If you were at all honest, you would admit this truth. |
+100 |
You’re pathetic. This came from Biden’s DOJ. The 25th Amendment needs to be invoked. |
Plus one. I am sure Trump instructed GOP heavy hitters to strong arm him behind the scenes … |
Bullshit. If it isn’t in the report it isn’t relevant. His presentation was all about his feelings which are not evidence or legal argument. He didn’t put any of that bullshit in the report because he knows it is way out of bounds. It was a wholly unprofessional performance. He should not say anything to the press that he did not say in the report. It’s disgraceful conduct. |
Well said Heather Cox Richardson …
Yesterday, Special Counsel Robert Hur, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in January 2023 to investigate President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents before he was president, released his report. It begins: “We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter. We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy did not foreclose criminal charges against a sitting president.” The Department of Justice closed a similar case against former Vice President Mike Pence on June 1, 2023, days before Pence announced his presidential bid, with a brief, one-page letter. But in Biden’s case, what followed the announcement that he had not broken a law was more than 300 pages of commentary, including assertions that Biden was old, infirm, and losing his marbles and even that “[h]e did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died” (p. 208). As television host and former Republican representative from Florida Joe Scarborough put it: “He couldn’t indict Biden legally so he tried to indict Biden politically.” Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and their teams came out swinging against what amounted to a partisan hit job by a Republican special counsel. The president’s lawyers noted that it is not Department of Justice practice and protocol to criticize someone who is not going to be charged, and tore apart Hur’s nine references to Biden’s memory in contrast to his willingness to “accept…other witnesses’ memory loss as completely understandable given the passage of time.” |
+1 Merrick Garland, darling of the left, *assigned* this to Hur. Democrats just can't bear to hear the truth. |
MG is a registered Republican |
No it didn’t. It came from a disappointed partisan special counsel who did not find a legitimate case so he smeared the person he had hoped to charge. The report exonerated Biden. Hur was not speaking for DOJ or for the report. |
Trump cult followers don’t care about rule of law, proper legal behavior, respecting precedent or basic human decency. |
Plus one |
For all you people calling Hur a political operative, is it your contention that Biden has no cognitive decline? |