Call to discuss the state of Hardy 05/15/23

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are there parents who really still believe their whiteness and money didn’t directly influence their ability to impact this school this quickly? I mean beleive what you gotta believe about WHY you felt PJ had to go but the fact that he was removed and HOW he was removed is directly related to ya’lls clout in this City. To believe otherwise is naive and absurd and as others have tried to point out—reeks of your privilege and cluelessness. Do you believe if you were an upset group of Ward 8 parents any of this would have happened. Your collective refusal to acknowledge this makes it difficult to take any of you seriously.

It doesn’t matter that everyone at DCPS is black. You all represent the richest (and whitest) Ward in the City. DCPS knows who they CAN and CANT ignore. I don’t excuse any of it…but for Christ sake stop trying to deny it.




please, search the forum for what happened at JO Wilson. This has nothing to do with race. (for the record that WAS a case of a black male principal being unfairly pushed out … )


Yeah, but he was openly gay. In DC the same voices who scream racism are also openly homophobic.


Wow I did not even know that. Not to reopen that issue, but that was a huge loss to DCPS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what’s up with the teacher trolls. But they seem to want us to believe that Hardy went from a school steadily improving in outcome and reputation, to a school with really unhappy parents, for no reason at all having to do with the leadership. That seems … hard to believe.


Teacher troll here - I don’t think the PTO realized how much this has upset my staff as a whole. This whole thing happened behind our backs and moved at the speed of light. We are shocked and angry. So yea, pardon us if we lash out in an online forum that continues to perpetuate lies.

If anyone from the PTO is here - might as well cancel that happy hour next week. We want nothing to do with y’all.


+1. Change my RSVP to no


Sorry, but what experienced PTO lead thinks its a wise idea to plan a happy hour at a bar for parents and staff to gather and drink together? Sounds totally irresponsible and unprofessional to me.


Disagree. My kid's English teacher is hot and I am newly single.


LOL!


Touche! Thanks for the laugh!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what’s up with the teacher trolls. But they seem to want us to believe that Hardy went from a school steadily improving in outcome and reputation, to a school with really unhappy parents, for no reason at all having to do with the leadership. That seems … hard to believe.


Teacher troll here - I don’t think the PTO realized how much this has upset my staff as a whole. This whole thing happened behind our backs and moved at the speed of light. We are shocked and angry. So yea, pardon us if we lash out in an online forum that continues to perpetuate lies.

If anyone from the PTO is here - might as well cancel that happy hour next week. We want nothing to do with y’all.


+1. Change my RSVP to no


Sorry, but what experienced PTO lead thinks its a wise idea to plan a happy hour at a bar for parents and staff to gather and drink together? Sounds totally irresponsible and unprofessional to me.


Disagree. My kid's English teacher is hot and I am newly single.


Yikes. I know who you are talking about.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.



Excellent points, thank you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.



I am thankful we have a PTO, LSAT and class liaisons that are committed to the school and willing to fight for change when needed. I couldn’t give a damn what color they are. That there are people out there like you taking note of speakers’ skin complexion like a damn bingo card instead of assessing the merits of what they have to say is really pathetic. That you think what you are doing is “anti-racist” is kinda crazy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.



I am thankful we have a PTO, LSAT and class liaisons that are committed to the school and willing to fight for change when needed. I couldn’t give a damn what color they are. That there are people out there like you taking note of speakers’ skin complexion like a damn bingo card instead of assessing the merits of what they have to say is really pathetic. That you think what you are doing is “anti-racist” is kinda crazy.


The PTO encourages (begs?) people to volunteer for officer positions, welcomes everybody to meetings, seeks to hear all views. It's no exclusive cabal.

If there are people who want their voice heard, the opportunity is there for the taking.
Anonymous




The PTO encourages (begs?) people to volunteer for officer positions, welcomes everybody to meetings, seeks to hear all views. It's no exclusive cabal.

If there are people who want their voice heard, the opportunity is there for the taking.


Is that really true - that you listen to other factions? Did you listen to the voices of the teachers who had to call for emergency staff meetings to express opposition to this decision?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:




The PTO encourages (begs?) people to volunteer for officer positions, welcomes everybody to meetings, seeks to hear all views. It's no exclusive cabal.

If there are people who want their voice heard, the opportunity is there for the taking.


Is that really true - that you listen to other factions? Did you listen to the voices of the teachers who had to call for emergency staff meetings to express opposition to this decision?

A) The petition process was not conducted by the PTO.

B) *I* don't listen to any factions. I am one of the ones who reads all the emails seeking participation but doesn't show up. I've never been to a PTO meeting. I am hugely appreciative of the people who undertake these roles.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.



I am thankful we have a PTO, LSAT and class liaisons that are committed to the school and willing to fight for change when needed. I couldn’t give a damn what color they are. That there are people out there like you taking note of speakers’ skin complexion like a damn bingo card instead of assessing the merits of what they have to say is really pathetic. That you think what you are doing is “anti-racist” is kinda crazy.


See, to me, that’s a problem. You should care that your PTO in no way reflects the demographics of your school. You should care that the many different voices are not represented in these meetings. You could also ask yourselves why these parents don’t show up or participate. Are there obstacles to their participation? But you all don’t do much self reflection. This thread has made that abundantly clear. You are always right.

I was listening to what people were saying in the meeting (not playing bingo). I found the meeting very uncomfortable and disliked what several parents had to say.

I never said I was being ANTI-RACIST. I was disagreeing with the poster who said that white parents taking charge to remove PJ in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is somehow “by definition” anti-racist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:




The PTO encourages (begs?) people to volunteer for officer positions, welcomes everybody to meetings, seeks to hear all views. It's no exclusive cabal.

If there are people who want their voice heard, the opportunity is there for the taking.



Is that really true - that you listen to other factions? Did you listen to the voices of the teachers who had to call for emergency staff meetings to express opposition to this decision?

A) The petition process was not conducted by the PTO.

B) *I* don't listen to any factions. I am one of the ones who reads all the emails seeking participation but doesn't show up. I've never been to a PTO meeting. I am hugely appreciative of the people who undertake these roles.

Thanks for the reply. The people who deserve the most appreciation, IMO, are those who are in the trenches everyday at school. I don't see much appreciation for them throughout this entire thread. As a community member and lifelong Ward 3 resident, a graduate of DCPS, and a public school teacher...I am deeply concerned by the way in which this was handled, and equally troubled by the acrimony it has created. It appears that the parents seek to run the school - where does it stop?
Anonymous
Well, for what it’s worth, my DC has had a wonderful time at Hardy. We’re white, for those who would like to know, since we seem to be separating the white vs. black experience at the school (so sad).
DC and friends love the school and their teachers. I’m involved with my child and have seen the work from class. It is not busy work and they go in depth in some subjects.
The vitriol I’m seeing here towards teachers is really unfair.
Two fundamental constituents were missing from the meetings, letter, etc: teachers and students.
Now, in terms of safety, transitions seem to be an issue. Are there people on duty at various times? Like dismissal?
Another thing to consider is that we are now on a post-covid era and seeing how much we’ve all suffered from it. However, expectations seem to have gone back exactly to where we were before covid.
Lastly, scheduling is a mess in most school until right before school starts.
And to the single dad, I’m a Hardy mom, single too. Are you cute?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.



I am thankful we have a PTO, LSAT and class liaisons that are committed to the school and willing to fight for change when needed. I couldn’t give a damn what color they are. That there are people out there like you taking note of speakers’ skin complexion like a damn bingo card instead of assessing the merits of what they have to say is really pathetic. That you think what you are doing is “anti-racist” is kinda crazy.


See, to me, that’s a problem. You should care that your PTO in no way reflects the demographics of your school. You should care that the many different voices are not represented in these meetings. You could also ask yourselves why these parents don’t show up or participate. Are there obstacles to their participation? But you all don’t do much self reflection. This thread has made that abundantly clear. You are always right.

I was listening to what people were saying in the meeting (not playing bingo). I found the meeting very uncomfortable and disliked what several parents had to say.

I never said I was being ANTI-RACIST. I was disagreeing with the poster who said that white parents taking charge to remove PJ in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is somehow “by definition” anti-racist.


Actually, I think people have done that reflection, which is why there are meetings in the evenings in person but also with a Zoom option plus free coffee at drop-off a couple of times a month plus multiple regular communications from the PTO and grade liaisons.

Notifications about the PTO meetings literally end with the line, "We encourage you to attend the meeting, and we want to ensure that everyone's voice is heard."

A lot has been done to minimize barriers. The Hardy PTO is quite well run and and thougthful. One thing people cannot do is force others to engage.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Hardy parent but good for these parents for getting organized and leading an effective outcome.
This puts DCPS on notice that they better do right by Hardy.
[b]Maybe someone could encourage the Hardy parent organizers to help other parent communities at other schools to organize as well to pressure DCPS to improve learning conditions.

DCPS needs accountability as they get away with way too much crap


This would be viewed as "condescending" and "evidence of privilege". There is no winning. If you don't try and help you are a racist. If you try and help you are a racist. The only acceptable response is to self flagellate early and often and hope to be labeled and ally.

-signed
Someone who used to try and support these causes but has had enough


Everyone get out your tiniest violins for the poor white victims in our society


Are you really trying to convince us you’ve tried to help the schools of other Wards? Because no one believes you.

Y’all are crazy defensive. You think it’s “performative” to consider your role in perpetuating inequality and racism. you’ve got no intention of helping others whatsoever. You benefit from this system. You’re like—I got mine!! My kids are “suffering” at this TERRIBLE school and we just HAPPEN to have time and resources to do something about it!! Geez I wonder WHY you have the time and resources to do anything about it?? Nothing to do with race there, huh??

No one’s is saying you should stop advocating but the the repeated screams of THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE! are just dumb.

PJ might have needed to go but I have no doubt that had he been a young WHITE first year principal it would have been handled differently.


Hardy is almost 2/3 BIPOC. White parents fighting to improve Hardy is anti-racist by definition. Read your Kendi.


Lol. The fact that that white parents dominate the PTO, LSAT, and class liaison positions in a school that is 2/3 BIPOC is already hugely problematic and definitely not anti-racist. The PTO is not representative of the student population.

It is not anti-racist to have white parents and a PTO that does not reflect the student body (in a 2/3 BIPOC school) decide to remove the first black principal in years with little to no engagement with BIPOC families. Now I’m not saying it’s necessarily racist-but it sure as sh** ain’t anti-racist.

I saw one black PTO member…during that Zoom call. Everyone else who spoke was white.

How many of those 400 signatures came from BIPOC families? Really how many?

While we are at it…How many of the 400 signatures represented unique families? I bet good money on the fact that half those signatures represented the same household.



I am at a different DCPS where despite a lot of effort for recruitment, there is very little BIPOC participation on LSAT and PTO. My sense is the wealthy black parents have better things to do (like apply to private schools) and working class parents are working. Meanwhile the white parents are supposed to do nothing, and that’s somehow better for everyone? Again, you need to get your theories straight for what white parents are supposed to do. STFU and “hoard privilege” and get our kids tutors, or actually try to make the diverse school better? Or move to an all-white school?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This controversy will set Hardy back a decade. Sad.


What? You think the UMC families that predominate Hardy are going to go somewhere else? To protest...an active PTA? Demands for competent principals? The only [b]people who are upset by this are race baiters who don't send their kids to Hardy and like to agitate to stir up crap.[/b]


Not true. Send my kids to Hardy. Am upset by how this unfolded. Am not a race baiter. Not everyone is camp Hardy was a hellscape with “kids roaming the halls” and therefore the principal had to leave immediately with a month left of school.

This is part of what is upsetting. Many of you fail to even consider any alternate point of view and that’s how you proceeded. There is ton of dismissive, self righteous, condescending and flat out aggressive comments on this thread from the parents who support this. No other view points matter but yours. Even teachers who have reasonably brought up good points are attacked here and called names. Mob mentality.

It doesn’t matter now anyhow as it’s done. Let’s see how the next month of school goes. I suspect it will get worse before it gets better.


If the threshold for change is a "hellscape with kids roaming the hallways" then the disconnect here is my expectations for a well functioning school vs yours.


Are you intentionally misunderstanding my point? I clearly meant that Hardy is nowhere near a hellscape and that having “kids in the halls” is not a a sign of a school on the brink of collapse. Have you spent much time in the halls of Hardy?

Some posters continue to exaggerate what is happening at Hardy and I was saying that not everyone believes this version of Hardy.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: