Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

They did not, and while your posts are informative you're going to end up talking to yourself if you continue to just be rude and attacking everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

They did not, and while your posts are informative you're going to end up talking to yourself if you continue to just be rude and attacking everyone.

I attacked no one. I was told to relax, which is not appropriate in this case. Maybe I should relax but I still don't need lectures and I wasn't rude. Should I just be silent and not inform people about what is actually happening in court? That seems like a mistake. Perhaps using less emotion might be a good plan and perhaps you are right however it's a very emotional topic for me. I am doing my very best to interject appropriately when I can see clearly there are messages intended to intentionally mislead the public by both the press and the defense. In the presses case it is to get people to pay attention, and they are suggesting inproper and inaccurate things from the prosecution as a team, and the police department itself. I think these things are serious and so I react because of that. Clearly I misunderstood what the one poster said. However I am sincere about what I said and why about the case. I do care and that is why I am doing my best to not call names or attack posters. This is a public forum and I am simply trying to be clear about what I see is happening and doing my best to convey it in an appropriate way. I make mistakes, but I am not being openly rude. I see attacks as name calling or being crude in someway. I have not done this at all. Being asked to relax is a trigger for most people. I think the information I have given about the case is more important than always having a perfect tone. I will try to improve but why must I walk on eggshells in this way when my intentions are clearly to advocate for a fair trial and to tell the truth as I see it. It sure is different than the narrative the defense is attempting to create, or the click bait that journalism or court tv creates to increase viewers and eyes. At least what I seek is justice. Cut me some slack my filter is at least honest and humanitarian rather than manipulative, self serving, or dishonest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

YIKES I said defense here and meant prosecution. lol thats a bad mistake on My part. I am not supporting or defending the defense of a murderer Brandon's team. I am pro prosecution because I believe that Brandon is guilty as is Juliana of killing two innocent people who didn't deserve to be murdered. I believe the bad light should be shed on the killer and not the prosecution which is pursuing justices. I fully believe that everything including the actual character of the victims point to the murder falling fully on Brandon and the nanny Juliana. So My boo boo with saying the defense is a horrid mistake. I wish I could edit after I post on here but I cant!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

How about instead of relax, you just… Take a step back. I do believe you are well intentioned, but you’re coming off as unhinged. You are way too deep in the weeds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

YIKES I said defense here and meant prosecution. lol thats a bad mistake on My part. I am not supporting or defending the defense of a murderer Brandon's team. I am pro prosecution because I believe that Brandon is guilty as is Juliana of killing two innocent people who didn't deserve to be murdered. I believe the bad light should be shed on the killer and not the prosecution which is pursuing justices. I fully believe that everything including the actual character of the victims point to the murder falling fully on Brandon and the nanny Juliana. So My boo boo with saying the defense is a horrid mistake. I wish I could edit after I post on here but I cant!

Take a breath, lady. We all want these murderers to go down. But you aren’t helping with these long winded rants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

YIKES I said defense here and meant prosecution. lol thats a bad mistake on My part. I am not supporting or defending the defense of a murderer Brandon's team. I am pro prosecution because I believe that Brandon is guilty as is Juliana of killing two innocent people who didn't deserve to be murdered. I believe the bad light should be shed on the killer and not the prosecution which is pursuing justices. I fully believe that everything including the actual character of the victims point to the murder falling fully on Brandon and the nanny Juliana. So My boo boo with saying the defense is a horrid mistake. I wish I could edit after I post on here but I cant!

Take a breath, lady. We all want these murderers to go down. But you aren’t helping with these long winded rants.

You need to stop telling this person how to behave. Stop controlling how much others write and what they say.

I hope they keep informing us. Everyone is free to post here, that is what moderators are for!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

How about instead of relax, you just… Take a step back. I do believe you are well intentioned, but you’re coming off as unhinged. You are way too deep in the weeds.

Hey man, didn't you read what the PP said? They don't seem unhinged at all, I think they must know the victims, thats how I read it.

Give up the lectures dude, let them get it out. It's a free discussion forum, you are not in charge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

YIKES I said defense here and meant prosecution. lol thats a bad mistake on My part. I am not supporting or defending the defense of a murderer Brandon's team. I am pro prosecution because I believe that Brandon is guilty as is Juliana of killing two innocent people who didn't deserve to be murdered. I believe the bad light should be shed on the killer and not the prosecution which is pursuing justices. I fully believe that everything including the actual character of the victims point to the murder falling fully on Brandon and the nanny Juliana. So My boo boo with saying the defense is a horrid mistake. I wish I could edit after I post on here but I cant!

Take a breath, lady. We all want these murderers to go down. But you aren’t helping with these long winded rants.

You need to stop telling this person how to behave. Stop controlling how much others write and what they say.

I hope they keep informing us. Everyone is free to post here, that is what moderators are for!

The PP is "correcting" people when they are in the wrong. Its one thing to provide factual information, its another to jump to conclusions and derail this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

YIKES I said defense here and meant prosecution. lol thats a bad mistake on My part. I am not supporting or defending the defense of a murderer Brandon's team. I am pro prosecution because I believe that Brandon is guilty as is Juliana of killing two innocent people who didn't deserve to be murdered. I believe the bad light should be shed on the killer and not the prosecution which is pursuing justices. I fully believe that everything including the actual character of the victims point to the murder falling fully on Brandon and the nanny Juliana. So My boo boo with saying the defense is a horrid mistake. I wish I could edit after I post on here but I cant!

Take a breath, lady. We all want these murderers to go down. But you aren’t helping with these long winded rants.

You need to stop telling this person how to behave. Stop controlling how much others write and what they say.

I hope they keep informing us. Everyone is free to post here, that is what moderators are for!

The individual clearly has ASD. Give them some grace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

YIKES I said defense here and meant prosecution. lol thats a bad mistake on My part. I am not supporting or defending the defense of a murderer Brandon's team. I am pro prosecution because I believe that Brandon is guilty as is Juliana of killing two innocent people who didn't deserve to be murdered. I believe the bad light should be shed on the killer and not the prosecution which is pursuing justices. I fully believe that everything including the actual character of the victims point to the murder falling fully on Brandon and the nanny Juliana. So My boo boo with saying the defense is a horrid mistake. I wish I could edit after I post on here but I cant!

Take a breath, lady. We all want these murderers to go down. But you aren’t helping with these long winded rants.

You need to stop telling this person how to behave. Stop controlling how much others write and what they say.

I hope they keep informing us. Everyone is free to post here, that is what moderators are for!

The individual clearly has ASD. Give them some grace.

And you clearly have NPD

[Anonymous]

All these abbreviations and they all mean nothing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am on the jury.

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there.

If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.

this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all.

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax.

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty...

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket.

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this.

I’m a new poster. You missed the word “if” in the initial post about the woman’s spouse. (She said IF jury selection had processed, indicating that it had not.) It’s okay. It’s also okay for you to say “whoops—I misread the post!” And then everyone moves on. I feel for you because I think your heart is in the right place but I hope you don’t communicate this way in your real life. It’s okay to have misread the post. It’s also okay to admit you made a mistake and then move on. I’m saying this only because it you were my friend or daughter I would want you to learn that this is not the best way to communicate/respond.
Best wishes to you and thank you for keeping people updated on the trial.