Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

You're pretty gullible if you genuinely believe this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

You're pretty gullible if you genuinely believe this.

Er, no, you're pretty gullible if you'd rather believe the hordes of conspiracy theories and misinformed rumors/gossip/spin speculating on her supposed motivations and machinations, all fueled by "anonymous sources" and "a friend of a friend of someone close to the royals".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

You're pretty gullible if you genuinely believe this.

Er, no, you're pretty gullible if you'd rather believe the hordes of conspiracy theories and misinformed rumors/gossip/spin speculating on her supposed motivations and machinations, all fueled by "anonymous sources" and "a friend of a friend of someone close to the royals".

It's not "conspiracy theories" when their motivations are conveyed loud and clear through their behavior. If you can't see this, you're not paying attention. And if you're relying on their public statements, well... they've been caught in lies many times. So you're gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

You're pretty gullible if you genuinely believe this.

Er, no, you're pretty gullible if you'd rather believe the hordes of conspiracy theories and misinformed rumors/gossip/spin speculating on her supposed motivations and machinations, all fueled by "anonymous sources" and "a friend of a friend of someone close to the royals".

It's not "conspiracy theories" when their motivations are conveyed loud and clear through their behavior. If you can't see this, you're not paying attention. And if you're relying on their public statements, well... they've been caught in lies many times. So you're gullible.

Yeah, no, you're gullible. I've made my own educated assessment of them and their situation based on their actions, their behaviors, their words, and public statements from those close to them. You've made your own patchwork guesswork based on rumors, hearsay, and your own preconceived notions and prejudices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The catalyst for all this mess is obviously Meghan. Harry, by himself never expressed an interest in accumulating more wealth and more fame. It makes no sense.

Its hilarious that this random D lister though British palaces and tiaras were not enough and wanted MORE money and MORE fame.

Gross.

And hey, she got it and you're still sitting in your boring house whining about it on an anonymous message board.

She got infamy when she wanted adulation. Quite a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

You're pretty gullible if you genuinely believe this.

Er, no, you're pretty gullible if you'd rather believe the hordes of conspiracy theories and misinformed rumors/gossip/spin speculating on her supposed motivations and machinations, all fueled by "anonymous sources" and "a friend of a friend of someone close to the royals".

It's not "conspiracy theories" when their motivations are conveyed loud and clear through their behavior. If you can't see this, you're not paying attention. And if you're relying on their public statements, well... they've been caught in lies many times. So you're gullible.

Also, you're completely daft if you're really trying to deny that Meghan received unwarranted and unprecedented amounts of hate and vitriol both in the press and on social media (fueled by press, which was in turn fueled by misinformation and ill intent). I mean, there's already academic research being written around the treatment Meghan received.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that they were registering domains before their daughter was born gives more credence to "informing" the Queen as opposed to getting her blessing on the name Lilibet. Way to to put gran on the spot. Disgusting that they use their children and their connection to the "racist" monarchy as cash cows because they have no talents to speak of.
It is so incredibly obvious what these two are all about.

It's actually very, very common practice for public figures to register domain names (and similar) for their children (or similar, e.g. new companies), and to also claim multiple variations. The Sussexes already debunked this: they registered multiple domain name options for their daughter in advance, not just Lilibet Diana.

They should have registered Lilibucks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The catalyst for all this mess is obviously Meghan. Harry, by himself never expressed an interest in accumulating more wealth and more fame. It makes no sense.

Its hilarious that this random D lister though British palaces and tiaras were not enough and wanted MORE money and MORE fame.

Gross.

And hey, she got it and you're still sitting in your boring house whining about it on an anonymous message board.

She got infamy when she wanted adulation. Quite a difference.

Who the hell would choose hatred and infamy over adulation and adoration?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that they were registering domains before their daughter was born gives more credence to "informing" the Queen as opposed to getting her blessing on the name Lilibet. Way to to put gran on the spot. Disgusting that they use their children and their connection to the "racist" monarchy as cash cows because they have no talents to speak of.
It is so incredibly obvious what these two are all about.

It's actually very, very common practice for public figures to register domain names (and similar) for their children (or similar, e.g. new companies), and to also claim multiple variations. The Sussexes already debunked this: they registered multiple domain name options for their daughter in advance, not just Lilibet Diana.

They should have registered Lilibucks.

Is this supposed to be a clever joke? You sound old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

So how did they go from wanting "freedom from the Royal Rota and the ability to earn money" (their original reasons for leaving per their own statement) to "the family and press are racist, and no one cared that Meghan was suicidal"? What happened between those two things was: they were told they couldn't use HRH or Sussex Royal and be half working royals and that their security would not be paid for in the United States. That made them mad.

[Anonymous]

Very sweet! From the official Twitter account of the Librarian of Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan Markle wanted out because she was being absolutely obliterated and villainized by the British press, not because she wanted more money and fame.

You're pretty gullible if you genuinely believe this.

Er, no, you're pretty gullible if you'd rather believe the hordes of conspiracy theories and misinformed rumors/gossip/spin speculating on her supposed motivations and machinations, all fueled by "anonymous sources" and "a friend of a friend of someone close to the royals".

It's not "conspiracy theories" when their motivations are conveyed loud and clear through their behavior. If you can't see this, you're not paying attention. And if you're relying on their public statements, well... they've been caught in lies many times. So you're gullible.

Also, you're completely daft if you're really trying to deny that Meghan received unwarranted and unprecedented amounts of hate and vitriol both in the press and on social media (fueled by press, which was in turn fueled by misinformation and ill intent). I mean, there's already academic research being written around the treatment Meghan received.

Yeah, because all academic research is groundbreaking and valuable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that they were registering domains before their daughter was born gives more credence to "informing" the Queen as opposed to getting her blessing on the name Lilibet. Way to to put gran on the spot. Disgusting that they use their children and their connection to the "racist" monarchy as cash cows because they have no talents to speak of.
It is so incredibly obvious what these two are all about.

It's actually very, very common practice for public figures to register domain names (and similar) for their children (or similar, e.g. new companies), and to also claim multiple variations. The Sussexes already debunked this: they registered multiple domain name options for their daughter in advance, not just Lilibet Diana.

They should have registered Lilibucks.

Is this supposed to be a clever joke? You sound old.

You sound mad

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The catalyst for all this mess is obviously Meghan. Harry, by himself never expressed an interest in accumulating more wealth and more fame. It makes no sense.

Its hilarious that this random D lister though British palaces and tiaras were not enough and wanted MORE money and MORE fame.

Gross.

And hey, she got it and you're still sitting in your boring house whining about it on an anonymous message board.

She got infamy when she wanted adulation. Quite a difference.

Who the hell would choose hatred and infamy over adulation and adoration?

They made their bed...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Very sweet! From the official Twitter account of the Librarian of Congress.

If anything, the lady is consistent and persistent! No doubt the Meghan haters will believe that 8th grade Meghan was actually conniving to get mentioned in a future Twitter post in order to upset the Cambridges and therefore bring shame to the royal family... how dare she?!