Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

The BL impersonator is HILARIOUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

The BL impersonator is HILARIOUS.

Can you share a link??

[Anonymous]

I went on r/Itendswithlawsuits and lost braincells. It sounds like teenagers writing fanfiction. Blake is in an abusive marriage with Ryan and was taking out her frustration on Justin because she is scared or Ryan. Or how about the Justin is incapable of sexual harrassment view. Incapable is quite a statement. Or making claims and and stating them as fact with no evidence.

Seems most on there haven't read anything at all. Just read some headlines and are alls speculating and making up stories.

I don't go on Fauxmoi as that site generally is poison! I saw a couple posts on popculturechat and they seemed to be the most sane.

But reddit is just a bunch of mostly young - I think 15-24 is their main demographic and that comes across very strongly.

Once (on another sub) I was responding to someone who was really writing irrational things...turned out they were 13! You forget that on reddit sometimes that they are mostly really young.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

The BL impersonator is HILARIOUS.

Can you share a link??

https://www.tiktok.com/@michaelpavano/video/7462163111517179166?lang=en

https://www.tiktok.com/@michaelpavano/video/7464754412087430430

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I went on r/Itendswithlawsuits and lost braincells. It sounds like teenagers writing fanfiction. Blake is in an abusive marriage with Ryan and was taking out her frustration on Justin because she is scared or Ryan. Or how about the Justin is incapable of sexual harrassment view. Incapable is quite a statement. Or making claims and and stating them as fact with no evidence.

Seems most on there haven't read anything at all. Just read some headlines and are alls speculating and making up stories.

I don't go on Fauxmoi as that site generally is poison! I saw a couple posts on popculturechat and they seemed to be the most sane.

But reddit is just a bunch of mostly young - I think 15-24 is their main demographic and that comes across very strongly.

Once (on another sub) I was responding to someone who was really writing irrational things...turned out they were 13! You forget that on reddit sometimes that they are mostly really young.

Accurate though it depends on the sub. I follow some subs there related to hobbies and the commentary is mature and informative and people are clearly adults. But yes, the celebrity gossip stuff skews young and vacuous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

The BL impersonator is HILARIOUS.

Can you share a link??

https://www.tiktok.com/@michaelpavano/video/7462163111517179166?lang=en

https://www.tiktok.com/@michaelpavano/video/7464754412087430430

He legitimately wore it better.

Top comment- “she’s gonna add you to the lawsuit!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the latest theories focus on Blake pursuing the producing credit as a way to promote herself as a viable producing partner for Taylor Swift’s directorial debut, against other options such as Reese Witherspoon. Theories link Sony’s support of all her demands because they too want to work with Taylor.

Without a doubt that's true. It's also just the fact that she's a talentless nepo baby actress who is middle aged, her acting runway is over. The real money and power is in seguing into producing and directing. And again, it warrants emphasizing, this is someone so damn lazy, stupid and unqualified she can't even bother to read a book.

[Anonymous]

I'm not pro anyone, I frankly don't care about anyone involved, it's just clear as day JB was railroaded by two scam artists and their "team".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not pro anyone, I frankly don't care about anyone involved, it's just clear as day JB was railroaded by two scam artists and their "team".

+1. I had no idea who JB was before this all started but I've worked with enough vipers like Blake and Ryan it was very clear to me what went down here from the jump and nothing I've seen since has remotely convinced me otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the latest theories focus on Blake pursuing the producing credit as a way to promote herself as a viable producing partner for Taylor Swift’s directorial debut, against other options such as Reese Witherspoon. Theories link Sony’s support of all her demands because they too want to work with Taylor.

Without a doubt that's true. It's also just the fact that she's a talentless nepo baby actress who is middle aged, her acting runway is over. The real money and power is in seguing into producing and directing. And again, it warrants emphasizing, this is someone so damn lazy, stupid and unqualified she can't even bother to read a book.

Without a doubt? That is all it took for you. A random anonymous comment and you are 100% sure.

[Anonymous]

So the latest theories focus on Blake pursuing the producing credit as a way to promote herself as a viable producing partner for Taylor Swift’s directorial debut, against other options such as Reese Witherspoon. Theories link Sony’s support of all her demands because they too want to work with Taylor.

So they supported her because of Taylor, not because she extorted via false claims of sexual harassment? Great news for Blake.

[Anonymous]

Building a fake CV so she could steal movies and get DEI venture capital funding. It’s all quite transparent. And it was obviously all Ryan’s idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

The BL impersonator is HILARIOUS.

It's crazy that he's spot on with her facial expressions!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

The BL impersonator is HILARIOUS.

Can you share a link??

https://www.tiktok.com/@michaelpavano/video/7462163111517179166?lang=en

https://www.tiktok.com/@michaelpavano/video/7464754412087430430

I don't really get it? I mean, I get the joke with her outfits and agree they are ripe for parody but this doesn't send me. I don't think he has nailed her face at all, though he does appear to have found her lipstick shade.

I have a thing about men impersonating women for laughs though. Like I think part of what I'm supposed to find funny is that I can see his chest hair in the overalls, for instance, and this just strikes me as pretty retrograde. Maybe I'd find it funnier if he wasn't emphasizing some of his masculine features to impersonate a woman. Or if he did a good vocal impersonation. But this feels pretty cheap and lazy, IMO.

[Anonymous]

OK just learned some new fun facts from an influencer called saraonthings on insta who has been posting a lot of content about this. Before anyone comes at me for pulling stuff off of SM, all of these are facts that can be easily verified. She’s just pulling them together for us all and now I’m doing the same for you.

So Blake lively set up a production company called B for effort in 2020. The company was registered, Blake is the only person ever associated with it.

The company announced a slate of projects it was working on, none have ever come to fruition here five years later. There was one project where Blake was going to make her directorial debut that was announced in 2022 and now that has been squashed. With that movie there there was a business partner spoken about, somebody named Kate, bottom line is Kate is married to a very high up executive at Sony.

Don’t know what this all means, production company never got off the ground and is now defunct. But interesting nonetheless.

Seems like maybe Blake did try to produce and direct and it didn’t happen organically so now maybe this is the route they went with.