Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

[Anonymous]

Ryan stood up in front of 15 million viewers watching SNL and made a joke about their lawsuit and his wife’s totally serious and super horrific sexual harassment allegations. I don’t know of any man that jokes about his wife’s sexual harassment claims. Creepy Ryan and his creepy mom also did a sexual harassment sketch targeting Brandon Sklenar. Ryan also boasted he grabbed the boobs of a female actress after a scene ended.

[Anonymous]

I don’t get why the joke is a big deal. I think he was just giving a nod to the media hoopla.

If he had made a joke about an intimacy coodinator, that would be crass. Oh, wait.

[Anonymous]

“Plantation-wedding-having, blackface-wearing, pre-civil-war-south-loving, talentless and entitled nepo baby throws feckless media tantrum in retaliation of people having the audacity to see her for who she really is.” lol

Witnessing Blake and Ryan’s crash out has been hilarious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

This. It doesn't even say "sources within Sony" which could be read as Sony wanting to get the word out that this is their position. "Sources" could just as easily mean sources within Wayfarer and of course they have a very good reason to make it look like Lively never reported any SH during filming.

It could be correct but it could also be BS -- no one should trust an anonymous "report" from THR with no confirmation from an actual person at Sony. TBH, at this point I'd want to see documentation because Sony has an interest in making it appear that they had no idea that there were problems on set.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

Nope, are you disputing she removed allegations from her first complaint that were disproved by Justin’s “receipts”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

[Anonymous]

We're all here, reading and posting. A lot. I'm not going to judge anyone. I don't mind when people report things they read about on reddit, except when they don't post a link so we can understand what they are paraphrasing (like the bunch of lawyers who were all checking the docket yesterday because someone mentioned reddit said she quietly amended her complaint!). Someone posted a visual timeline from reddit in the last few pages that was also really good.

I only check in here but I will read links provided for reddit and articles, and will watch videos if they are short and about the legal case. The reddits I have seen are so wildly either pro-Lively or pro-Baldoni that I'm always like, wow, how does anyone believe that. I appreciate the PP giving somewhat of a lay of the land on which are which.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

I'm the PP and happy to admit I'm spending too much time thinking about this. But I also only started looking at reddit very recently, like within the last week, thanks to people who posted links to reddit posts from here. I had to set up a reddit account to do it! So I'm definitely not the only person looking at reddit on here and now that I see what is happening on reddit I can better see how it's driving the conversation here -- certain topics will trend there and then pop up here within a few hours or a day. Including old topics that aren't "news" so it's pretty clear the arguments and info are coming from there even when they don't link to Reddit.

[Anonymous]

I’m not really into Reddit, I keep up with news through this thread, and sometimes I’ll find something on reels or threads. There’s also some really good podcasts for more of the deep dives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s there. It specifically states that Sony Gianetti did receive complaints from Blake, but that the complaints she made were about proper Covid protocols on the set, not about harassment.

It’s right there.

I don't see where Sony came out and said she lied and that the only complaints were about covid. Who from Sony are you seeing said that? Can you link the name, then I can search that in the article. I read it twice and still haven't seen it.

A specific person is not identified. You know, sort of like how Blake has yet to identify the other complainants but you accept their existence.

BL put hers in a legal document. A random tabloid referring to vague, general 'sources' means nothing.

Well, she puts things in a legal document and then she omits them in the next iteration, so I don’t think that’s any more a guarantee of truth.

lol, are you the same person who came in hot 24 hours ago wrongly claiming Lively had surreptitiously amended her complaint yesterday because of something you read on Reddit? Just checking how much weight to give to your/reddit’s/jed Wallace’s theories.

If you follow r/ItEndsWithLawsuits you can tell that someone in this thread is importing arguments there to here. I follow that sub plus several others in the hopes of getting sort of a balanced impression of online sentiment. That one is very pro-JB, there's a super pro-Lively one I follow too (r/BaldoniFiles) and then r/Fauxmoi and r/popculturechat are more neutral in that they sometimes lean pro-Lively, sometimes pro-Baldoni (in the fall they were both very pro-JB but now they lean more toward Lively).

Both the pro-JB and pro-Lively subs will have good posts and then a lot of BS posts that are insanely biased. I can tell someone on here is *deep* in that pro-JB sub and just kind of regurgitating stuff from there.

The person who is “deep” into this is you. I think I am not alone in posting/reading only here.

Are people allowed to have an opinion without there being a conspiracy that they are deep into all these subs? Blake Lively is a spoiled brat and has done herself no favors with this case. That does not mean she deserves harrassment, but in her world it is ok to take over a movie and rewrite scenes and have her husband bully the director, but no one is allowed to say anything to her.

The texts messages from Baldoni show him being nothing but encouraging and supportive. Meanwhile Blake cannot even have a civil 10 minute interview with a reporter without inserting her diva behavior and victimhood. It is tiresome. The only thing I like about this case, besides Baldoni's hot body, is the guy who impersonated Blake on Tik Tok. I don't give a damn about the Lilly Flowers film or any other Blake or Ryan project and I will probably never see a Baldoni movie.. So, Tik Tok guy for the win. And I did not import my thoughts from Reddit.

[Anonymous]

Apparently Taylor is enraged she was drag into this scam.