2024 Boys Private School Results /Game Schedules/ Commentary

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Gonzaga kid is the only one not a hold back.


That is not true the Prep defender is actually young for the 2025 class and is not re-classed. Why do people keep making things up about these kids?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Gonzaga kid is the only one not a hold back.


That is not true the Prep defender is actually young for the 2025 class and is not re-classed. Why do people keep making things up about these kids?


Because no one likes Prep.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Gonzaga kid is the only one not a hold back.


That is not true the Prep defender is actually young for the 2025 class and is not re-classed. Why do people keep making things up about these kids?


Because no one likes Prep.


Their jealous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Gonzaga kid is the only one not a hold back.


That is not true the Prep defender is actually young for the 2025 class and is not re-classed. Why do people keep making things up about these kids?


Because no one likes Prep.


*They’re jealous.
Anonymous
I don't know what criteria is used to compile these lists. A few things to call, these lists are extremely subjective.

I've seen kids who ended up being top players in college who were not even close to being considered top in their graduating class year. I've seen kids who graduated from one local private school in particular (on this list), who never even panned out in college, and quit by the time they were juniors at the collegiate level.

For those of you who have sons who might seem a bit rattled they weren't recognized, use this as motivation to fuel your workouts this off-season.

For those of you who were fortunate to be recognized, keep working hard as there are surely others trying to pass you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Reclassing works. The top guys are usually reclassed players. If they stayed in their class they would be midlevel players. Smart for mom and dad to stroke themselves.


Why are people so ignorant. Most of these kids have their birthdays listed on Inside Lacrosse. All you have to do is click on their name and look. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some kids are reclassified for sure, but many (if not the majority) are not. Educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Reclassing works. The top guys are usually reclassed players. If they stayed in their class they would be midlevel players. Smart for mom and dad to stroke themselves.


Why are people so ignorant. Most of these kids have their birthdays listed on Inside Lacrosse. All you have to do is click on their name and look. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some kids are reclassified for sure, but many (if not the majority) are not. Educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.


Of the 3 local kids (SJC, Bullis and GZ) two are holdbacks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Reclassing works. The top guys are usually reclassed players. If they stayed in their class they would be midlevel players. Smart for mom and dad to stroke themselves.


Why are people so ignorant. Most of these kids have their birthdays listed on Inside Lacrosse. All you have to do is click on their name and look. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some kids are reclassified for sure, but many (if not the majority) are not. Educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.


Of the 3 local kids (SJC, Bullis and GZ) two are holdbacks.


There are more than three local kids. Prep has two on the list. 3+2=5
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Reclassing works. The top guys are usually reclassed players. If they stayed in their class they would be midlevel players. Smart for mom and dad to stroke themselves.


Why are people so ignorant. Most of these kids have their birthdays listed on Inside Lacrosse. All you have to do is click on their name and look. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some kids are reclassified for sure, but many (if not the majority) are not. Educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.


Of the 3 local kids (SJC, Bullis and GZ) two are holdbacks.


There are more than three local kids. Prep has two on the list. 3+2=5


TBD if one of those kids is a holdback. He’s not a local kid, he boards at Prep.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Reclassing works. The top guys are usually reclassed players. If they stayed in their class they would be midlevel players. Smart for mom and dad to stroke themselves.


Why are people so ignorant. Most of these kids have their birthdays listed on Inside Lacrosse. All you have to do is click on their name and look. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some kids are reclassified for sure, but many (if not the majority) are not. Educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.


Of the 3 local kids (SJC, Bullis and GZ) two are holdbacks.


There are more than three local kids. Prep has two on the list. 3+2=5


TBD if one of those kids is a holdback. He’s not a local kid, he boards at Prep.


Ok, Mr. Petty. Don’t know how old he is and don’t care, but he goes to a local school and lives here 9 months out of the year. He can rightly be considered a local kid when comparing top local lacrosse recruits because he goes to school here and competes against other local kids and schools. Why so petty? Insecure? Jealous?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Inside Lacrosse just came out with their Top 50 in the 2025 Class. Prep has two on the list and Bullis, SJC, and Gonzaga each have one.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/inside-lacrosse-class-of-2025-top-50-junior-rankings/62034


These kids are just getting bigger!


That's because most these kids are a product of reclassing.


Reclassing works. The top guys are usually reclassed players. If they stayed in their class they would be midlevel players. Smart for mom and dad to stroke themselves.


Why are people so ignorant. Most of these kids have their birthdays listed on Inside Lacrosse. All you have to do is click on their name and look. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some kids are reclassified for sure, but many (if not the majority) are not. Educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.


Of the 3 local kids (SJC, Bullis and GZ) two are holdbacks.


There are more than three local kids. Prep has two on the list. 3+2=5


TBD if one of those kids is a holdback. He’s not a local kid, he boards at Prep.


Ok, Mr. Petty. Don’t know how old he is and don’t care, but he goes to a local school and lives here 9 months out of the year. He can rightly be considered a local kid when comparing top local lacrosse recruits because he goes to school here and competes against other local kids and schools. Why so petty? Insecure? Jealous?


The guy made a factual statement, you're the one flipping out here dude
Anonymous
Prep has a non local player? Shocked
Anonymous
25% of Preps students are boarders - right?

If that is the case, why wouldn’t they have kids from outside the DMV on their roster.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:25% of Preps students are boarders - right?

If that is the case, why wouldn’t they have kids from outside the DMV on their roster.



Episcopal had plenty of of state players never helped them win an IAC
Anonymous
Episcopal is less than half the size of prep and is a co-ed school.

EHS has never committed to lacrosse, the only care about football and basketball for the most part.

Prep having boarding players is nothing new
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: