The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even middle schoolers know better. There’s is no defense here and half of you are working overtime at the troll farm.

There’s no better headline than this:

Brett Kavanaugh protesters ignore police barricades, occupy the U.S. Capitol

https://news.yahoo.com/brett-kavanaugh-protesters-ignore-police-194043428.html

This is the sort of thing you post on a Saturday morning? A breathless minimization of a failed coup? So maybe the next time will be more successful, hmm?

SMH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even middle schoolers know better. There’s is no defense here and half of you are working overtime at the troll farm.

There’s no better headline than this:

Brett Kavanaugh protesters ignore police barricades, occupy the U.S. Capitol

https://news.yahoo.com/brett-kavanaugh-protesters-ignore-police-194043428.html

This is the sort of thing you post on a Saturday morning? A breathless minimization of a failed coup? So maybe the next time will be more successful, hmm?

SMH

They were in Grassley’s office after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why isn't Trump paying their legal defense? He's the reason they are there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Okay so I actually watched that first video. It looked like a parody of Nazi propaganda. If you replaced all those flags with Nazi flags and Trump with Hitler, it would literally be indistinguishable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.

Yeah. Thanks to the videos released by McCarthy, we have seen that the J6 unselect committee was incredibly biased and one-sided in their effort to paint a picture that was not accurate.
We all suspected this prior to the hearings, but these videos have confirmed it.
Someone should go to jail for not allowing the defense of many of these individuals to have access to evidence prior to their pleas/trials.
Should it be Pelosi? Someone in the DOJ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.

Yeah. Thanks to the videos released by McCarthy, we have seen that the J6 unselect committee was incredibly biased and one-sided in their effort to paint a picture that was not accurate.
We all suspected this prior to the hearings, but these videos have confirmed it.
Someone should go to jail for not allowing the defense of many of these individuals to have access to evidence prior to their pleas/trials.
Should it be Pelosi? Someone in the DOJ?

Insurrectionist denier or insurrectionist apologizer? I'm not sure which is the better term.

Both are pretty shameful. For anyone who has any shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Okay so I actually watched that first video. It looked like a parody of Nazi propaganda. If you replaced all those flags with Nazi flags and Trump with Hitler, it would literally be indistinguishable.

Godwin's law on display here......

A new study shows that the so-called law is, in fact, backed up by evidence. A data analyst who blogs under the name CuriousGnu has analyzed 4.6 million reddit comments to find that 78 percent of conversations that reach 1,000 or more comments mention Nazis or Hitler.

Godwin explains that the comparison is usually out of desperation. "Discovering what other people think when they disagree with you is quite disturbing. So there's a tendency to escalate," he says. He adds that the Internet created the first opportunity for such a diverse range of people to interact in an unmediated space.

But of course, the problem with such escalated online rhetoric, he explained in that 1994 essay, is that it trivializes the atrocities of Hitler and the Nazis during the Holocaust. References to them for context in historical discussions? Fine. Shorthand to insult someone? Offensive.

https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/05/09/477057058/study-shows-people-still-love-inappropriately-referencing-nazis-online

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.

Yeah. Thanks to the videos released by McCarthy, we have seen that the J6 unselect committee was incredibly biased and one-sided in their effort to paint a picture that was not accurate.
We all suspected this prior to the hearings, but these videos have confirmed it.
Someone should go to jail for not allowing the defense of many of these individuals to have access to evidence prior to their pleas/trials.
Should it be Pelosi? Someone in the DOJ?

Insurrectionist denier or insurrectionist apologizer? I'm not sure which is the better term.

Both are pretty shameful. For anyone who has any shame.

Meh.
You seem to be someone who is opposed to proper discovery and just fine with Brady violations as long as it involves someone with whom you disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.

Yeah. Thanks to the videos released by McCarthy, we have seen that the J6 unselect committee was incredibly biased and one-sided in their effort to paint a picture that was not accurate.
We all suspected this prior to the hearings, but these videos have confirmed it.
Someone should go to jail for not allowing the defense of many of these individuals to have access to evidence prior to their pleas/trials.
Should it be Pelosi? Someone in the DOJ?

Insurrectionist denier or insurrectionist apologizer? I'm not sure which is the better term.

Both are pretty shameful. For anyone who has any shame.

Meh.
You seem to be someone who is opposed to proper discovery and just fine with Brady violations as long as it involves someone with whom you disagree.

Do you still have that lawyer degree from Fox?

[Anonymous]

Video showing Shaman guy entering building. He is in first group to go in immediately after a couple folks break the windows, go inside and open the doors.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jbxng-nIMu0

[Anonymous]

Republicans sure do love criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“ “I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Throwing others under the bus. Nice.

That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).

There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.

Yeah. Thanks to the videos released by McCarthy, we have seen that the J6 unselect committee was incredibly biased and one-sided in their effort to paint a picture that was not accurate.
We all suspected this prior to the hearings, but these videos have confirmed it.
Someone should go to jail for not allowing the defense of many of these individuals to have access to evidence prior to their pleas/trials.
Should it be Pelosi? Someone in the DOJ?

+1