Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have been posting comments supportive to Lively in this thread and I'm a different person from someone else who is posting comments that can be read as being supportive to Lively in this thread. Honestly I think there are at least three of us, and sometimes I believe there are even four. The sheer idiocy of believing your point of view is the only right one that can possibly exist and there must not be people who disagree with you (especially when you are making arguments about plastic surgery and who has shown "evidence" of someone being a "bad person") is really giving off Justin Baldoni "all normal women tear off their clothes when they give birth" vibes so, kudos on that.

I’m neither of those posters, but this is funny. All you have to do is look at those past videos of BL. Her character shines thru on them. Mean girl all the way!

Sorry, but just calling it like it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This was an interesting read.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14416677/truth-Blake-Lively-Justin-Baldoni-composer-brian-tyler.html#comments-14416677

She sounds like a total agent of chaos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

Sure.

If you have a problem then take it to Jeff and stop sh!tposting your dumb conspiracy theories here. You're exhausting. Cut it out.

That wasn’t even me. That was another poster. Not sure why YOU are so unhinged about all of us that support JB here. From what I can see, there quite a few of us.

But I am not the conspiracy theorist. That must be another JB supporter.

Carry on.

I don't have a problem with being outnumbered by Baldoni supporters. I just am tired of being accused of sock puppeting as if it's impossible that more that one person might think Lively's SH claims are viable (someone makes these accusations about every 15-20 pages). It's insulting. Proper place for those attacks are Website Feedback.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

Sure.

If you have a problem then take it to Jeff and stop sh!tposting your dumb conspiracy theories here. You'r exhausting. Cut it out.

Take a breather and step away. It’s okay.

[Anonymous]

And now the whole special protective order request by BL’s team is being blown up in the media. Freedman is arguing for transparency while BLs team wants to keep details for attorneys eyes only during discovery.

Now this rich. BL strikes first with a media story in the Times. Then later wants a gag order issued after JB defends himself with a timeline of events.

BL now wants certain future details hidden from the public due to nasty feedback and threats that she has received.

Didn’t JB also receive some awful hubris when her Times story first came out? Wasn’t there word floating that he sh her and potentially that he was a sexual predator? Was that not damaging and harmful also? I bet he received a lot of negative and potentially hateful feedback. People dropped him, unfollowed him. His own team and author of the book unfollowed him. Ouch!

But now BL no longer wants transparency because it can cause harm and bring about threats to her and her people.

What am I getting wrong here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now the whole special protective order request by BL’s team is being blown up in the media. Freedman is arguing for transparency while BLs team wants to keep details for attorneys eyes only during discovery.

Now this rich. BL strikes first with a media story in the Times. Then later wants a gag order issued after JB defends himself with a timeline of events.

BL now wants certain future details hidden from the public due to nasty feedback and threats that she has received.

Didn’t JB also receive some awful hubris when her Times story first came out? Wasn’t there word floating that he sh her and potentially that he was a sexual predator? Was that not damaging and harmful also? I bet he received a lot of negative and potentially hateful feedback. People dropped him, unfollowed him. His own team and author of the book unfollowed him. Ouch!

But now BL no longer wants transparency because it can cause harm and bring about threats to her and her people.

What am I getting wrong here?

Nothing. "Rules for thee but not for me" is a common theme with Blake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now the whole special protective order request by BL’s team is being blown up in the media. Freedman is arguing for transparency while BLs team wants to keep details for attorneys eyes only during discovery.

Now this rich. BL strikes first with a media story in the Times. Then later wants a gag order issued after JB defends himself with a timeline of events.

BL now wants certain future details hidden from the public due to nasty feedback and threats that she has received.

Didn’t JB also receive some awful hubris when her Times story first came out? Wasn’t there word floating that he sh her and potentially that he was a sexual predator? Was that not damaging and harmful also? I bet he received a lot of negative and potentially hateful feedback. People dropped him, unfollowed him. His own team and author of the book unfollowed him. Ouch!

But now BL no longer wants transparency because it can cause harm and bring about threats to her and her people.

What am I getting wrong here?

Nothing. "Rules for thee but not for me" is a common theme with Blake.

Yup.

[Anonymous]

I be previously reported a Blake supporter for sock puppeting and Jeff removed it. I am not going to constantly be reporting posts but suspect it is still occurring to some extent. That doesn’t mean that all Blake supporting posts are from the same poster, I don’t believe that to be true, but there is one prolific Blake poster who sometimes sock puppets and her style is easy to identify. I’ll leave it there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I be previously reported a Blake supporter for sock puppeting and Jeff removed it. I am not going to constantly be reporting posts but suspect it is still occurring to some extent. That doesn’t mean that all Blake supporting posts are from the same poster, I don’t believe that to be true, but there is one prolific Blake poster who sometimes sock puppets and her style is easy to identify. I’ll leave it there.

Why would anyone be reported on an entertainment forum?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I be previously reported a Blake supporter for sock puppeting and Jeff removed it. I am not going to constantly be reporting posts but suspect it is still occurring to some extent. That doesn’t mean that all Blake supporting posts are from the same poster, I don’t believe that to be true, but there is one prolific Blake poster who sometimes sock puppets and her style is easy to identify. I’ll leave it there.

Why would anyone be reported on an entertainment forum?

Because it’s annoying to see 10 long winded posts from the same person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are regular people so invested in this and so defensive of Blake Lively when all the evidence thus far is against her? What am I missing?

You're missing that most of the "evidence" against her is not even connected to her allegations and that Lively has evidence to back up her side as well. For instance the texts between the PR people, the fact that Wayfarer was willing to sign the document agreeing to her demands (which were not unreasonable and were designed to provide for a respectful workplace where consent was prioritized), and the fact that Livley had documented several complaints even before that and which Wayfarer admitted to in the form of apologies and promises that it wouldn't happen again. I also think the video that was released of the dance thing shows a bad dynamic in which Baldoni was clearly pushing for more physical contact/kissing in the scene than Lively was comfortable with, which raises red flags for me about how scenes like that were conducted. Of course their characters kiss and are intimate during the movie, but the video backs up Lively's claims that Baldoni would add kissing and other intimate behavior to scene that were no scripted as such, which raises consent issues for me.

But I'm sure I will be told that I'm crazy, I must work for Lively's PR team, and that Lively is obviously a lying liar who lies and Baldoni is the second coming. So no need to tell me, I've heard it already, thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was an interesting read.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14416677/truth-Blake-Lively-Justin-Baldoni-composer-brian-tyler.html#comments-14416677

She sounds like a total agent of chaos.

BL is a horrible person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I be previously reported a Blake supporter for sock puppeting and Jeff removed it. I am not going to constantly be reporting posts but suspect it is still occurring to some extent. That doesn’t mean that all Blake supporting posts are from the same poster, I don’t believe that to be true, but there is one prolific Blake poster who sometimes sock puppets and her style is easy to identify. I’ll leave it there.

The problem with your theory is that I am a Blake supporter who sometimes posts long posts but I have seen other longer posts from other Blake supporters that I know weren't mine. I've also seen long posts from Baldoni supporters.

I think people sometimes post long posts on this subject because it's complex and the debate is heated, and it takes more than a couple sentences to make an argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was an interesting read.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14416677/truth-Blake-Lively-Justin-Baldoni-composer-brian-tyler.html#comments-14416677

She sounds like a total agent of chaos.

BL is a horrible person.

I mean, all it took for me was the horrible baby bump interview and she never explained or apologized or anything. That was all it took for many people. The lawsuit etc. is just expected of someone like her. Typical narcissist.

[Anonymous]

Has the judge ruled on the discovery motion yet? I know Blake’s team made some concessions about scope, so maybe not necessary,