Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, they amended their complaint today “quietly.”

It shows the text of where JB was labeled as a sexual predator. Reddit offers the deets.

You appear to be lying as nothing is on the docket reflecting this. You are probably reading something on reddit that you don't understand, or just making things up in your head.

I guess I can perform basic Reddit queries better than you can. It’s therex

There is no new amended complaint. I’m sure someone is just rehashing the specifics of some aspect of it.

I'm a DP from PP above saying there is no new amended complaint (I'm the original person arguing with PP on this) and I also can't find any amended complaint on the docket. PP claiming there is both (1) does not know how to find docket sheets or read them; and (2) does not appear to be reading reddit correctly.

I think they’re referring to this Reddit thread. https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1ixuyyc/blake_livelys_lawyers_quietly_removed_these_texts/

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gone for a week and this thread has once again gone south.

Do some of you all not have jobs? Working with annoying people comes with the territory, regardless of profession. Being annoying or as some of you put it, unprofessional, is not actionable as sexual harassment.

And being outwitted strategically is not extortion.

Bit being threatened with fabricated sexual harassment claims in exchange for rights to a movie is.

Please point to where Lively threatened Baldoni with fabricated SH claims in exchange for movie rights. And no, Reddit threads where random people just assert that this is what must have happened don't count. Show where Lively threatened to go public with fabricated claims to get the rights to the sequel.

How did it go from Blake supporting Justin and the film to having Justin and his family segregated into the basement at the premier? Why did Blake make this happen?

Because he sexually harassed her on set.

Nope. Didn’t happen. No one believes her. The people that seem to believe her are projecting and I suppose that is exactly what the plan was all along. Some people will think it happened no matter what the evidence shows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gone for a week and this thread has once again gone south.

Do some of you all not have jobs? Working with annoying people comes with the territory, regardless of profession. Being annoying or as some of you put it, unprofessional, is not actionable as sexual harassment.

And being outwitted strategically is not extortion.

Bit being threatened with fabricated sexual harassment claims in exchange for rights to a movie is.

Please point to where Lively threatened Baldoni with fabricated SH claims in exchange for movie rights. And no, Reddit threads where random people just assert that this is what must have happened don't count. Show where Lively threatened to go public with fabricated claims to get the rights to the sequel.

How did it go from Blake supporting Justin and the film to having Justin and his family segregated into the basement at the premier? Why did Blake make this happen?

Because he sexually harassed her on set.

Not from what’s been disclosed. You cannot harass if you don’t have power. BL has demonstrated in so many ways that she was able to usurp power or force JB into submission. Wardrobe, meeting locations, terrace scene, marketing—she’s no victim here. She got most of demands met by JB and team. She welded power! And was never afraid to use it, which she did repeatedly.

No sh there.

Plus a zillion!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, they amended their complaint today “quietly.”

It shows the text of where JB was labeled as a sexual predator. Reddit offers the deets.

You appear to be lying as nothing is on the docket reflecting this. You are probably reading something on reddit that you don't understand, or just making things up in your head.

I guess I can perform basic Reddit queries better than you can. It’s therex

There is no new amended complaint. I’m sure someone is just rehashing the specifics of some aspect of it.

I'm a DP from PP above saying there is no new amended complaint (I'm the original person arguing with PP on this) and I also can't find any amended complaint on the docket. PP claiming there is both (1) does not know how to find docket sheets or read them; and (2) does not appear to be reading reddit correctly.

I think they’re referring to this Reddit thread. https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1ixuyyc/blake_livelys_lawyers_quietly_removed_these_texts/

DP. Thank you for solving the mystery! I don't get the relevance of why the other PP mentioned this, but it appears this paragraph was in her original complaint and isn't in the amended one from weeks ago. So not a new amended complaint.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

There’s no evidence he’s a bad person and there is abundant evidence that she is. I will never stop posting about her “allure of antebellum” because it contextualizes how poor her reputation was before anyone dreamed of retaining crisis PR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

Sure.

If you have a problem then take it to Jeff and stop sh!tposting your dumb conspiracy theories here. You're exhausting. Cut it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No amended complaint is posted on the docket today and as far as I'm aware there is no where to surreptitiously change a complaint on the docket once it's been filed, so post it or you don't seem to know what you're talking about.

This, the judge begrudgingly gave her a one day extension as it was.

[Anonymous]

This was an interesting read.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14416677/truth-Blake-Lively-Justin-Baldoni-composer-brian-tyler.html#comments-14416677

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

Sure.

If you have a problem then take it to Jeff and stop sh!tposting your dumb conspiracy theories here. You're exhausting. Cut it out.

DP. Dragging Jeff in and getting all conspiracy minded is your issue, not that of the poster.

[Anonymous]

I have been posting comments supportive to Lively in this thread and I'm a different person from someone else who is posting comments that can be read as being supportive to Lively in this thread. Honestly I think there are at least three of us, and sometimes I believe there are even four. The sheer idiocy of believing your point of view is the only right one that can possibly exist and there must not be people who disagree with you (especially when you are making arguments about plastic surgery and who has shown "evidence" of someone being a "bad person") is really giving off Justin Baldoni "all normal women tear off their clothes when they give birth" vibes so, kudos on that.

[Anonymous]

Why are regular people so invested in this and so defensive of Blake Lively when all the evidence thus far is against her? What am I missing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s nice to see we still have sock puppeting on the Blake sode, at least it’s consistent.

Right? I basically stepped away from the thread because I can’t do it anymore. I almost just want to start a Justin Baldoni support thread because this one has been derailed….possibly by one person.

I'm not the Blake supporter, but I don't get it... 95%+ being against her isn't enough? You don't see anything as personally nasty and scathing posted about Baldoni here as the posts about Lively. There's literally one or two defending her and they are generally respectful and don't use personal attacks.

Sure.

If you have a problem then take it to Jeff and stop sh!tposting your dumb conspiracy theories here. You're exhausting. Cut it out.

That wasn’t even me. That was another poster. Not sure why YOU are so unhinged about all of us that support JB here. From what I can see, there quite a few of us.

But I am not the conspiracy theorist. That must be another JB supporter.

Carry on.