Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

Defenseless? Yeah I don’t think so. Do you think if Meghan and Archie appeared in public and were attacked, the family’s security would have just stood by and let the baby be kidnapped or murdered? Maybe that would happen in a soap opera or something but that’s not real life.

In any case, if Meghan is so scared for her safety, then she made a really bad decision to go on Oprah. Any security consultant would advise her to keep a low profile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

Defenseless? Yeah I don’t think so. Do you think if Meghan and Archie appeared in public and were attacked, the family’s security would have just stood by and let the baby be kidnapped or murdered? Maybe that would happen in a soap opera or something but that’s not real life.

In any case, if Meghan is so scared for her safety, then she made a really bad decision to go on Oprah. Any security consultant would advise her to keep a low profile.

With the way they treated her...yes.

[Anonymous]

Charles also stripped royal security from his hated ex-wife. Guess what happened to her within 12 months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles also stripped royal security from his hated ex-wife. Guess what happened to her within 12 months.

She didn’t wear her seatbelt and thus died from her injuries in an accident with her seatbeltless billionaire boyfriend while running from paparazzi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles also stripped royal security from his hated ex-wife. Guess what happened to her within 12 months.

She was definitely keeping a low profile with cokehead playboy Dodi Fayed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles also stripped royal security from his hated ex-wife. Guess what happened to her within 12 months.

She didn’t wear her seatbelt and thus died from her injuries in an accident with her seatbeltless billionaire boyfriend while running from paparazzi.

Yep. Diana chose a jet-setting lifestyle with an engaged playboy, and part of that was getting into a car with a speeding drunk driver and deciding not to wear a seatbelt. Personal responsibility, folks! Decisions have consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

Defenseless? Yeah I don’t think so. Do you think if Meghan and Archie appeared in public and were attacked, the family’s security would have just stood by and let the baby be kidnapped or murdered? Maybe that would happen in a soap opera or something but that’s not real life.

In any case, if Meghan is so scared for her safety, then she made a really bad decision to go on Oprah. Any security consultant would advise her to keep a low profile.

With the way they treated her...yes.

How did they treat her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles also stripped royal security from his hated ex-wife. Guess what happened to her within 12 months.

She chose to voluntarily climb into a car with a drunk driver while not wearing her seatbelt? Yup, totally Charles’ fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

No one told them to move back to America. They could have been well-protected in Canada.

Funny how they are almost universally hated on 2 (or is it 3 if we count Australia?) continents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

Wasn’t she on maternity leave for a good portion of May 2019 through November 2019?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

Wasn’t she on maternity leave for a good portion of May 2019 through November 2019?

Yep. That stopped her from doing public engagements. But the royal women, Kate included, are known to go on private walks with their newborn. The pictures don't make it into the paper. But basically just imagine the weekly strolls Pippa did/does.

Here's Kate with her stroller

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

NP. Harry and Meghan had security as long as they lived in the UK, because they were working royals. Maybe there wasn't an RPO specifically assigned to Archie (in Meghan's narrative, "stripped of security"), but his parents had a security team and he was... a newborn baby who wasn't going anywhere without them.

What they were complaining about in the Oprah interview is that the BRF refused to provide either taxpayer or privately-funded security for them after they chose to (1) quit being working royals, and (2) move halfway across the world to LA. They were no longer entitled to that after they quit their BRF jobs and chose to move to a place where security would be incredibly expensive and logistically difficult for the BRF to provide. Perhaps they should have taken that into consideration when deciding where to move. This story that the mean BRF refused to pay for Archie's security because of racism (or whatever else they're trying to suggest) is absurd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles also stripped royal security from his hated ex-wife. Guess what happened to her within 12 months.

She got in a car with a drunk driver and didn't wear a seatbelt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has “no money”?! He inherited $10 million from Diana! Sorry if that isn’t enough to live on, smh.

It’s not enough to cover security AND live when you’re getting death threats from White supremacists.

It was their choice to leave.

DP. I think they made the right choice. They were sacrificing their mental well-being in the UK for physical security. The UK tabloid was waging a constant campaign against Meghan with total lies (remember Megs' Commandments? - they came out in recanted it later) and quite frankly - the Sussexs were still receiving death threats in the UK as well.

And did you forget the whole impetus for them fleeing the UK was the BRF refusing not only titles for Archie but also the security that Harry has received his whole life?

Harassers were arrested for sending fake anthrax to Kensington Palace addressed to the couple, another man was sent to jail for calling Harry a race traitor, and another harasser showed up at Meghan's public engagement.

Royal family security is high-level but with Charles/William trying to strip their newborn of that same security, knowing what kind of threats they were receiving, I'd leave too.

This is false. Charles didn’t try to strip a newborn of security. He just decided to stop paying for it. Believe it or not, lots of adults support themselves and pay their own expenses.

Is that your way of declaring 'alternative facts'?

I'm seriously asking. Because Archie was born in the United Kingdom and taken home to Windsor Castle grounds. He was a newborn stripped of security.

Which makes me think back to the time period from May 2019 - November 2019 when Meghan didn't appear in public with her baby unless they were out of the country. She was afraid. Going on a foreign tour guaranteed high-level royal protection officers for her child. But in his own country - he was left defenseless.

Its even more odious that despite Charles & Andrew's acrimonious relationship the security for his daughters was never stripped until they reached the age of 18.

NP. Harry and Meghan had security as long as they lived in the UK, because they were working royals. Maybe there wasn't an RPO specifically assigned to Archie (in Meghan's narrative, "stripped of security"), but his parents had a security team and he was... a newborn baby who wasn't going anywhere without them.

What they were complaining about in the Oprah interview is that the BRF refused to provide either taxpayer or privately-funded security for them after they chose to (1) quit being working royals, and (2) move halfway across the world to LA. They were no longer entitled to that after they quit their BRF jobs and chose to move to a place where security would be incredibly expensive and logistically difficult for the BRF to provide. Perhaps they should have taken that into consideration when deciding where to move. This story that the mean BRF refused to pay for Archie's security because of racism (or whatever else they're trying to suggest) is absurd.

Meghan specifically explained that the security stripping discussions for Archie began before he was even born.

And I assure you - George, Charlotte and Louis were given RPOs with-and-without their parents. Nanny Maria doesn’t take any of those kids anywhere without them and neither does Carole.