Grow up. |
Look at Rosemary Hills ES for starters…parents who opt for public for elementary send their kids there for the small class size and it’s only K-2. But yeah, some folks may scoff at its socioeconomic diversity (ie. a much more accurate indicator of actual diversity) and send Lil’ Jonny to private instead. |
No, not worth it. Also, no matter how rich and elite you live among the masses. |
You should take some responsibility. If your kids are slumming it in public school, you only have yourself to blame. Don’t get mad when people work hard to give their kids a better life. |
| Main benefit of private for me is that it is not a device-based education. |
Agreed, unfortunately there are people like PP everywhere... |
I hope not. But aren't GDS, Sidwell, and Holton all using Chromebooks and websites to submit homework in Middle school? |
My kids are in private. But I don't send them to private school to avoid the so-called "unwashed mass". |
Wink wink. |
They also have a partner teacher. |
Our public has 19 and an aide half time. Still not enough to overcome the crappy curriculum. |
| We send our children to a parochial school, so not an expensive private school. Aside from the religious instruction, the school's decision not to use any EdTech is a huge draw. We get a full 9 years to build their attention spans and ability to read difficult texts without the distraction of a laptop or tablet before they get to high school. The very high behavioral standards are also great. |
You should know that the school environment is only one factor. Even elite private schools, like Sidwell and GDS, cater to the mean. For example, world language and math are not tracked at all. Yes, they pay close attention, kids are happier, and students with issues receive counseling. Yes, we pay $60 a year for maybe an improvement in their education. But as an immigrant, I realized much of learning happened outside school. Want to have solid Math? Join RSM. Want to master a second language? Join weekend school. Want to learn an instrument? go to Levine. The only things private schools really excel at are writing instructions and PE every day. And yes, your kid might meet some VIP/fancy kids early on. |
The kids don't use Chromebooks or iPads at all during K-8, except maybe computer lab for typing? That is great. Our parochial uses tech much much less than the local public, but they still allow iPads occasionally even in grade 3. DD reports getting to do MathFactsLab for 10 minutes a couple of times after finishing her classwork. We began looking at non-religious privates and I was shocked that many of them proudly report having lots of tech use starting in lower elementary. I guess parents paying 40-50K per year want that money to go toward something flashy or expensive, or at least admin seems to think so. |
This is correct. We opted for a "cheap" religious private for that reason. I have public parent friends asking me if the classes are accelerated or if they are working a grade above in math, or if there's school orchestra, and that's not really what I think private school is for us. We just want a normal, back-to-basics, low tech + levels/tracking + behavior standards elementary experience for young kids. Publics (at least in our neighborhood) have gone way off the deep end in terms of going socially/politically radically left and prioritizing events, celebrations, inclusion and SEL over everything else. |