|
The system is much better now. Back when it was pullout the GT teachers gatekeeped to keep their caseloads small, and they left out a lot of kids who should have been identified.
My kid was overlooked. When I parent referred, they tested so high even the principal was wondering how they were missed. |
+1 |
It’s not better now, just bad in a different way. The reality is we need 3 options for students especially in middle school and up-remedial, regular, intensified/honors. No one wants their kid in the struggling section so that should be placement based on test scores, work samples and teacher feedback. Honors should be similar. |
+1 |
This doesn't make sense. Every kid is test twice, once for NNaT and once for CogAT. You don't get tested based on a parent referral unless the kid is new. But a new kid wasn't overlooked, because they weren't there to be overlooked. |
This. Took nearly the entire school year, 2 years ago. |
Ok.... You want to gate keep out the engaged, bright kids who enjoy a subject even if they aren't tagged GT for whatever reason? Why is that? |
Exactly. There can be a lot of reasons why a kid isn't identified. Why gate keep? That doesn't serve anyone. |
No one has said that. About 30% of APS students are tagged, so it's far from an exclusive club and there are several ways to get tagged. The request is that that there be real differentiation for kids who are currently not being challenged and not only activities that are at a level that is appropriate for all students. For instance, book clubs last year in my kid's 5th grade were on below grade level books so all kids could participate. That's bunk. At least one book club should have had a more challenging book to challenge those who can read more challenging materials. Teachers can gatekeep or not who joins that book club, but they shouldn't refuse to offer a more challenging option because not everyone is able to read that book. And I really hate the APS system where math is endlessly boring in elementary but then they cram three years of math into 6th grade prealgebra. There should be a math track where kids get to start to do more challenging math by at least 4th grade with a ramp up to 7th grade Algebra, sort of like FCPS. It wouldnt be enough for super advanced kids, but would be better. |
If the kid needs more practice to learn grade level material perhaps they should be doing that work? If the kid can't read or do math well enough to participate in the activity without being frustrated or lost, then perhaps they should stick to grade level content? Other kids already know grade level content and are ready for more. There are kids who don't need differentiation and that's okay. |
Great - so no gate keeping. That’s not exactly in line with the earlier NFL comment, but ok. You shouldn’t base your entire opinion on that one book club for one class - that’s not representative of everything that is happening. There are extra book clubs, math groups, and projects. The difference now is that they are open to all kids who want to join, not just those who are tagged. And there is a lot more differentiation in middle school. |
I'm not basing my opinion on one book club. That's just one example. I'm basing my opinion on the fact my kids did a lot less sitting around waiting before APS decided that every activity had to be offered to every student. They used to get other things to do when they finished their work. Now the options are to read silently, do Lexia or do Dreambox. That's it and it stinks. |
|
Guess who isn’t dumbing down their curriculum so no one gets their feelings hurt?
Our foreign adversaries. |
|
Should we allow students to move on to 5th grade when they haven’t mastered 4th grade level content?
Seems like it, otherwise we are gatekeeeeeeping |
Again, you are drawing conclusions based on limited information. APS still offers differentiation. |