Kamala Harris owns a gun. Are you surprised or mad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shall not be infringed

Read the first part. We no longer have a militia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

Harris supports gun confiscation, mandatory sale to the government.

Keep trying, lyin’ MAGA sh*tbag!

DP

That’s NOT a lie. It’s in her campaign platform. That’s one of the biggest reasons many people whom I know support her, support her.

Because she has PROMISED that she will do gun confiscation. If she doesn’t, she may be a 1-term president herself. She made a promise. She damn well better keep it and do confiscation.

BULLSHIT. You can’t “do" “gun confiscation,” moron. Firearms are legal. There are 400 million of them in the U.S. No one’s coming for your guns, idiot.

It is not confiscating that will be effective . we put resources to buy back programs and then stop selling the assault weapons. It is accomplished with money if we are serious that we want to get rid of certain weapons.

Whatever... Meanwhile, Republicans use imbecilic “They’re gonna take yer guns away!” bullshit as a red-meat aphrodisiac for their dumb-sh*t base. It works.

But no one is coming for anyone’s guns.

Kamala’s a crack shot! Walz is even better! Suck it, MAGA!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

Harris supports gun confiscation, mandatory sale to the government.

Keep trying, lyin’ MAGA sh*tbag!

DP

That’s NOT a lie. It’s in her campaign platform. That’s one of the biggest reasons many people whom I know support her, support her.

Because she has PROMISED that she will do gun confiscation. If she doesn’t, she may be a 1-term president herself. She made a promise. She damn well better keep it and do confiscation.

BULLSHIT. You can’t “do" “gun confiscation,” moron. Firearms are legal. There are 400 million of them in the U.S. No one’s coming for your guns, idiot.

It is not confiscating that will be effective . we put resources to buy back programs and then stop selling the assault weapons. It is accomplished with money if we are serious that we want to get rid of certain weapons.

Whatever... Meanwhile, Republicans use imbecilic “They’re gonna take yer guns away!” bullshit as a red-meat aphrodisiac for their dumb-sh*t base. It works.

But no one is coming for anyone’s guns.

Kamala’s a crack shot! Walz is even better! Suck it, MAGA!

Whatever. If we decide we want to enact more gun control, we enact more gun control. It's our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shall not be infringed

Read the first part. We no longer have a militia.

Wrong - all US citizens are part of the unorganized militia below

10 U.S.C. § 311
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

But as the SC has ruled it is, was and always be an individual right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shall not be infringed

Read the first part. We no longer have a militia.

Wrong - all US citizens are part of the unorganized militia below

10 U.S.C. § 311
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are -
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

But as the SC has ruled it is, was and always be an individual right.

There is no "the SC". When different justices join the court, the rulings change. There is no always.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I actually am one of those liberals that Fox News is constantly warning about. I hate all guns and I would love for the government to confiscate them all. I think the only people who should have them are police and military.

I’m enthusiastically voting for Harris, but yes, I am a little disappointed that she’s a gun owner. But obviously she’s a responsible one and I get that it’s politically expedient for her to have one. So whatever.

One of the few honest replies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually am one of those liberals that Fox News is constantly warning about. I hate all guns and I would love for the government to confiscate them all. I think the only people who should have them are police and military.

I’m enthusiastically voting for Harris, but yes, I am a little disappointed that she’s a gun owner. But obviously she’s a responsible one and I get that it’s politically expedient for her to have one. So whatever.

One of the few honest replies.

See, this is your problem. You want to believe this one post and ignoring all of the others, because that's what it is to be a conservative gun nut. Your only "validation" is being seen as victims of the "woke/DEI/commie/cancel culture/ blah blah blah" left when you aren't. You claimed Obama was going to take your guns, he didn't. You claimed Biden would. He hasn't.

You want to believe every Dem gives a damn about you simply owning hand guns or a rifle. The majority believe you have no business owning an AR. You're not using it for hunting (there would be nothing left of your kill). There's something seriously wrong with someone desperate to own them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

This. I have zero problem with handguns, hunting rifles, dueling pistols, whatever.

I have a huge problem with assault rifles being so easily accessible that even teenagers can get their hands on one. There is no good reason to have an assault rifle. It is not a defensive weapon. It cannot be used to hunt. It is good for nothing but mass murder. A ban on assault rifles is supported by the vast majority of Americans. It is not an extreme position at all.

[Anonymous]

One can be a gun owner without being a gun humper.

Her gun ownership was definitely reported in the past — here’s CNN from 2019:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/04/11/politics/kamala-harris-gun-owner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does it change your view of gun ownership or of Kamala Harris?

She just lost my vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

Harris supports gun confiscation, mandatory sale to the government.

Keep trying, lyin’ MAGA sh*tbag!

DP

That’s NOT a lie. It’s in her campaign platform. That’s one of the biggest reasons many people whom I know support her, support her.

Because she has PROMISED that she will do gun confiscation. If she doesn’t, she may be a 1-term president herself. She made a promise. She damn well better keep it and do confiscation.

BULLSHIT. You can’t “do" “gun confiscation,” moron. Firearms are legal. There are 400 million of them in the U.S. No one’s coming for your guns, idiot.

It is not confiscating that will be effective . we put resources to buy back programs and then stop selling the assault weapons. It is accomplished with money if we are serious that we want to get rid of certain weapons.

We will start with the assault rifles first. Then it will be easier to gradually move on to other types, until we eventually get rid of every last one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

Assault rifles have been banned for decades here. Get educated before you spout your misinformed nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not surprised nor mad.

Does she stockpile guns? Did she purchase them legally? Did she have proper training? Does she store them responsibly? Does she have crazy machine gun like weapons that no civilian ever needs?

The details matter. She also supports reasonable, responsible gun legislation, so I'm not the least bit bothered as a non-gun owner.

“ crazy machine guns”. Tell me you know know nothing about firearms lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

“ military grade weapon”. Don’t think you’re schooling anyone with your very stupid and misinformed nonsense.

Newflash for all the dumb liberals who can’t put two brain cells together:

Civilians do not have access to weapons of war, nor is an AR-15 a weapon of war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does Trump own a gun? We know his sons do, but what about him?

Do they even know how to shot?

I don't his son ever shot before 2016.