The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting Fact: CNN averaged only 1.2 million viewers the day the Mueller Report was released

Another Interesting Fact: Mueller never interviewed several paid FBI informants (Joseph Mifsud, Stefan Halper, Henry Greenberg) who helped set up this counter-intelligence investigation.

Very interesting. Mifsud and Halper have been widely reported by Fox News, but Greenberg is news to even Hannity viewers.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article229413589.html

The Ukrainian angle of this is interesting. There has been reports that Ukraine interfered with 2016 election by trying to hurt Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew I wasn't supporting a saint but, I know the candidate I was supporting was the best choice for the America I love. So, shove your only patriots would vote for ABC BS where the sun doesn't shine. Thank you.

Did you know he was this much “not a saint”? Did you hope for better from him? Or do you think this isn’t such a big deal and the corrupt media and dems are making s**t up?

I knew his opponent was "this much not a saint" and so did Democrats. You all put that candidate up anyway! I read Lessig. I heard from Bernie supporters and you still put her up. I supported my America and will continue to do so unapologetically.

Ok. Fine. I get that you made the best decision you feel you could have then. How about now? Hillary is in the rear view mirror. How do you feel about the report and the finding that Trump is more corrupt/corruptible than you presumably imagined when you voted for him? Do you still support him?

DP here: I do support him. I didn't find anything new in the report that I didn't know before the election. I knew he was a businessman and he had prior dealings. If they rise to the level of criminal corruption, he should be prosecuted by DOJ. If DOJ chose not to prosecute him, it is on them. I am more concerned that after spending so much money on this investigation, now we will be spending more money on Congress investigation. It is time to move on.

Np- the entire point of the report is to give Congress the means to pursue. Literally the entire point. You shouldn’t be shrugging that off, and you shouldn’t be hoping congresses just “moves on”. The ball is in congresses court to do their jobs.

So, you believe that Congress can do something that Mueller and his high power attorneys and FBI agents were unable to do?

Are you serious? Yes, Mueller is a special counsel appointed by the executive. Under the US Constitution, the Congress has a duty to uphold the law and specifically as it applies to a sitting President.

Tell us about the high crimes and misdemeanors that were committed to warrant an impeachment.

Read the Mueller report. If you had read it, you wouldn't be asking the question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting Fact: CNN averaged only 1.2 million viewers the day the Mueller Report was released

Another Interesting Fact: Mueller never interviewed several paid FBI informants (Joseph Mifsud, Stefan Halper, Henry Greenberg) who helped set up this counter-intelligence investigation.

Very interesting. Mifsud and Halper have been widely reported by Fox News, but Greenberg is news to even Hannity viewers.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article229413589.html

The Ukrainian angle of this is interesting. There has been reports that Ukraine interfered with 2016 election by trying to hurt Trump.

And, there is the whole Ukraine and Biden connection. This will not help Biden in his run.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Barr is the big loser here, his credibility shredded. Sure, plenty of people knew him to be a political hack who puts tribe ahead of country. But a lot of DC insiders seemed to regard him as an honorable man for whatever reason. The fact that he read the report and then making like it reflected positively on Trump leaves him in the position of looking incredibly dishonest now that everyone is able to read much of the report.

Barr is the winner here. He will go down in history as the AG who saved our country. The haters are never his fans anyway.

A fellow American, welcome brother.

Yes I agree, soon all the details about the Mueller investigation was just another tool in a weak attempt to oust an elected President.

Hey, my dear American brothers, can you point to us where in the report Trump and his associates behaved like loyal, law-abiding, patriotic Americans?

You know, when they called the FBI or the CIA or told Republican Congressmen or the State Department or George W. Bush or ANY AMERICAN that, hey, there are a whole bunch of RUSSIANS who want to help us win the election? Or after the election, when did they tell ANYONE, hey, these Russians seem to want something in return for helping us win the election?

You do realize that a hostile foreign power attacked our country and, AT BEST, Trump & his buddies didn't do a damn thing to stop them.

What if, instead, say, North Korea did the hacking, and Hillary and her campaign behaved the way the Trumpkins did - somehow I think you'd believe that was a problem.

This is a good question. Read the Mueller report, you will find Russia started the interference in 2014. The Mueller report is a stunning rebuke of the Obama administration's inaction.

"They" should refer to the Obama administration. They opened a counter-intelligence investigation in 2016. So they knew Russia's activities. Why didn't the Obama tell anyone, including the Trump campaign?? They could have told Trump in August of 2016 during the intel briefing. Perhaps the reason why Obama admin was ineffective in countering Russia is that they focused all their energy surveilling and framing American citizens (Trump campaign)?

I think the interference started much earlier. In 2014 Obama's administration became aware of it.

Another interesting question that report does not address: Mueller and his team knew by November 2018 that there is no collusion, but chose not to release that information by announcing that they will release it after mid-term election. Why?

This is actually not true. The investigation was cut short as soon as Barr was sworn in. Mueller was nowhere near being "done." Barr's work over the past 10 years was compromising to him and the country.

Please cite a reputable source for this statement.

It will be confirmed if and when Mueller is sworn in before the House.

So - you are admitting that you are pulling this statement out of you A$$. Got it.

One of the interviews cited in the Mueller Report is from February, 2019. It is of one of a number of key witnesses whose names do not appear in the report. Odd that Barr was confirmed in Feb 2019, Mueller had just gotten an extension on the Grand Jury was in the midst of interviewing key witnesses and then all of the sudden, target dates for the report appear on Amazon with forwards from Trump lackeys. I also have inside information, but you can glean from what is public the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew I wasn't supporting a saint but, I know the candidate I was supporting was the best choice for the America I love. So, shove your only patriots would vote for ABC BS where the sun doesn't shine. Thank you.

Did you know he was this much “not a saint”? Did you hope for better from him? Or do you think this isn’t such a big deal and the corrupt media and dems are making s**t up?

I knew his opponent was "this much not a saint" and so did Democrats. You all put that candidate up anyway! I read Lessig. I heard from Bernie supporters and you still put her up. I supported my America and will continue to do so unapologetically.

Ok. Fine. I get that you made the best decision you feel you could have then. How about now? Hillary is in the rear view mirror. How do you feel about the report and the finding that Trump is more corrupt/corruptible than you presumably imagined when you voted for him? Do you still support him?

DP here: I do support him. I didn't find anything new in the report that I didn't know before the election. I knew he was a businessman and he had prior dealings. If they rise to the level of criminal corruption, he should be prosecuted by DOJ. If DOJ chose not to prosecute him, it is on them. I am more concerned that after spending so much money on this investigation, now we will be spending more money on Congress investigation. It is time to move on.

Np- the entire point of the report is to give Congress the means to pursue. Literally the entire point. You shouldn’t be shrugging that off, and you shouldn’t be hoping congresses just “moves on”. The ball is in congresses court to do their jobs.

So, you believe that Congress can do something that Mueller and his high power attorneys and FBI agents were unable to do?

Are you serious? Yes, Mueller is a special counsel appointed by the executive. Under the US Constitution, the Congress has a duty to uphold the law and specifically as it applies to a sitting President.

Tell us about the high crimes and misdemeanors that were committed to warrant an impeachment.

Read the Mueller report. If you had read it, you wouldn't be asking the question.

If you believe that there is rationale within the Mueller report to head to impeachment, do it. Call your Congress reps. Encourage them to do it. Please.
It will not end well for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Barr is the big loser here, his credibility shredded. Sure, plenty of people knew him to be a political hack who puts tribe ahead of country. But a lot of DC insiders seemed to regard him as an honorable man for whatever reason. The fact that he read the report and then making like it reflected positively on Trump leaves him in the position of looking incredibly dishonest now that everyone is able to read much of the report.

Barr is the winner here. He will go down in history as the AG who saved our country. The haters are never his fans anyway.

A fellow American, welcome brother.

Yes I agree, soon all the details about the Mueller investigation was just another tool in a weak attempt to oust an elected President.

Hey, my dear American brothers, can you point to us where in the report Trump and his associates behaved like loyal, law-abiding, patriotic Americans?

You know, when they called the FBI or the CIA or told Republican Congressmen or the State Department or George W. Bush or ANY AMERICAN that, hey, there are a whole bunch of RUSSIANS who want to help us win the election? Or after the election, when did they tell ANYONE, hey, these Russians seem to want something in return for helping us win the election?

You do realize that a hostile foreign power attacked our country and, AT BEST, Trump & his buddies didn't do a damn thing to stop them.

What if, instead, say, North Korea did the hacking, and Hillary and her campaign behaved the way the Trumpkins did - somehow I think you'd believe that was a problem.

This is a good question. Read the Mueller report, you will find Russia started the interference in 2014. The Mueller report is a stunning rebuke of the Obama administration's inaction.

"They" should refer to the Obama administration. They opened a counter-intelligence investigation in 2016. So they knew Russia's activities. Why didn't the Obama tell anyone, including the Trump campaign?? They could have told Trump in August of 2016 during the intel briefing. Perhaps the reason why Obama admin was ineffective in countering Russia is that they focused all their energy surveilling and framing American citizens (Trump campaign)?

I think the interference started much earlier. In 2014 Obama's administration became aware of it.

Another interesting question that report does not address: Mueller and his team knew by November 2018 that there is no collusion, but chose not to release that information by announcing that they will release it after mid-term election. Why?

This is actually not true. The investigation was cut short as soon as Barr was sworn in. Mueller was nowhere near being "done." Barr's work over the past 10 years was compromising to him and the country.

Please cite a reputable source for this statement.

It will be confirmed if and when Mueller is sworn in before the House.

So - you are admitting that you are pulling this statement out of you A$$. Got it.

One of the interviews cited in the Mueller Report is from February, 2019. It is of one of a number of key witnesses whose names do not appear in the report. Odd that Barr was confirmed in Feb 2019, Mueller had just gotten an extension on the Grand Jury was in the midst of interviewing key witnesses and then all of the sudden, target dates for the report appear on Amazon with forwards from Trump lackeys. I also have inside information, but you can glean from what is public the same thing.

Sure you do. I am sure we will hear all about it in the testimony. LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Barr is the big loser here, his credibility shredded. Sure, plenty of people knew him to be a political hack who puts tribe ahead of country. But a lot of DC insiders seemed to regard him as an honorable man for whatever reason. The fact that he read the report and then making like it reflected positively on Trump leaves him in the position of looking incredibly dishonest now that everyone is able to read much of the report.

Barr is the winner here. He will go down in history as the AG who saved our country. The haters are never his fans anyway.

A fellow American, welcome brother.

Yes I agree, soon all the details about the Mueller investigation was just another tool in a weak attempt to oust an elected President.

Hey, my dear American brothers, can you point to us where in the report Trump and his associates behaved like loyal, law-abiding, patriotic Americans?

You know, when they called the FBI or the CIA or told Republican Congressmen or the State Department or George W. Bush or ANY AMERICAN that, hey, there are a whole bunch of RUSSIANS who want to help us win the election? Or after the election, when did they tell ANYONE, hey, these Russians seem to want something in return for helping us win the election?

You do realize that a hostile foreign power attacked our country and, AT BEST, Trump & his buddies didn't do a damn thing to stop them.

What if, instead, say, North Korea did the hacking, and Hillary and her campaign behaved the way the Trumpkins did - somehow I think you'd believe that was a problem.

This is a good question. Read the Mueller report, you will find Russia started the interference in 2014. The Mueller report is a stunning rebuke of the Obama administration's inaction.

"They" should refer to the Obama administration. They opened a counter-intelligence investigation in 2016. So they knew Russia's activities. Why didn't the Obama tell anyone, including the Trump campaign?? They could have told Trump in August of 2016 during the intel briefing. Perhaps the reason why Obama admin was ineffective in countering Russia is that they focused all their energy surveilling and framing American citizens (Trump campaign)?

They did tell the Trump campaign, multiple times starting in August 2016. Trump's campaign both deflected and denied it. It was a puzzling reaction to those in the briefing. Don't you find that rather odd?

Not true. In fact Linsey Graham asked this exact same question to AG Barr in his latest hearing. It's puzzling to both the chairman and AG that FBI suspected at the time that Carter Page, George Papadopoulus and Manafort were working with Russians but they chose NOT to tell the Trump campaign about it. AG Barr testified that there were two former US attorneys working in the Trump campaign -- Rudy and Chris Christie. FBI could easily convey the message with those two. Unless FBI's goal all along was to frame American citizens and not stopping Russians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew I wasn't supporting a saint but, I know the candidate I was supporting was the best choice for the America I love. So, shove your only patriots would vote for ABC BS where the sun doesn't shine. Thank you.

Did you know he was this much “not a saint”? Did you hope for better from him? Or do you think this isn’t such a big deal and the corrupt media and dems are making s**t up?

I knew his opponent was "this much not a saint" and so did Democrats. You all put that candidate up anyway! I read Lessig. I heard from Bernie supporters and you still put her up. I supported my America and will continue to do so unapologetically.

Ok. Fine. I get that you made the best decision you feel you could have then. How about now? Hillary is in the rear view mirror. How do you feel about the report and the finding that Trump is more corrupt/corruptible than you presumably imagined when you voted for him? Do you still support him?

DP here: I do support him. I didn't find anything new in the report that I didn't know before the election. I knew he was a businessman and he had prior dealings. If they rise to the level of criminal corruption, he should be prosecuted by DOJ. If DOJ chose not to prosecute him, it is on them. I am more concerned that after spending so much money on this investigation, now we will be spending more money on Congress investigation. It is time to move on.

Np- the entire point of the report is to give Congress the means to pursue. Literally the entire point. You shouldn’t be shrugging that off, and you shouldn’t be hoping congresses just “moves on”. The ball is in congresses court to do their jobs.

So, you believe that Congress can do something that Mueller and his high power attorneys and FBI agents were unable to do?

pssst -- it's called "impeachment".

Go for it. Do it. I think it would be a GREAT move for the Dems.
And, good luck identifying the high crimes and misdemeanors. I am sure most of the Dems in the House would vote for impeachment without any crimes.......I hope they do.
And, the American people will show you what they think about your decision in 2020.

You need to correct your statement to the say "electoral college" because the American people overwhelmingly disapprove of Rumpus and the American people voted for his rival by a majority of 3 million in 2016.

Face it, Spanky is disliked and is an asterisk in the history of the American nation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Barr is the big loser here, his credibility shredded. Sure, plenty of people knew him to be a political hack who puts tribe ahead of country. But a lot of DC insiders seemed to regard him as an honorable man for whatever reason. The fact that he read the report and then making like it reflected positively on Trump leaves him in the position of looking incredibly dishonest now that everyone is able to read much of the report.

Barr is the winner here. He will go down in history as the AG who saved our country. The haters are never his fans anyway.

A fellow American, welcome brother.

Yes I agree, soon all the details about the Mueller investigation was just another tool in a weak attempt to oust an elected President.

Hey, my dear American brothers, can you point to us where in the report Trump and his associates behaved like loyal, law-abiding, patriotic Americans?

You know, when they called the FBI or the CIA or told Republican Congressmen or the State Department or George W. Bush or ANY AMERICAN that, hey, there are a whole bunch of RUSSIANS who want to help us win the election? Or after the election, when did they tell ANYONE, hey, these Russians seem to want something in return for helping us win the election?

You do realize that a hostile foreign power attacked our country and, AT BEST, Trump & his buddies didn't do a damn thing to stop them.

What if, instead, say, North Korea did the hacking, and Hillary and her campaign behaved the way the Trumpkins did - somehow I think you'd believe that was a problem.

This is a good question. Read the Mueller report, you will find Russia started the interference in 2014. The Mueller report is a stunning rebuke of the Obama administration's inaction.

"They" should refer to the Obama administration. They opened a counter-intelligence investigation in 2016. So they knew Russia's activities. Why didn't the Obama tell anyone, including the Trump campaign?? They could have told Trump in August of 2016 during the intel briefing. Perhaps the reason why Obama admin was ineffective in countering Russia is that they focused all their energy surveilling and framing American citizens (Trump campaign)?

I think the interference started much earlier. In 2014 Obama's administration became aware of it.

Another interesting question that report does not address: Mueller and his team knew by November 2018 that there is no collusion, but chose not to release that information by announcing that they will release it after mid-term election. Why?

This is actually not true. The investigation was cut short as soon as Barr was sworn in. Mueller was nowhere near being "done." Barr's work over the past 10 years was compromising to him and the country.

Please cite a reputable source for this statement.

It will be confirmed if and when Mueller is sworn in before the House.

So - you are admitting that you are pulling this statement out of you A$$. Got it.

One of the interviews cited in the Mueller Report is from February, 2019. It is of one of a number of key witnesses whose names do not appear in the report. Odd that Barr was confirmed in Feb 2019, Mueller had just gotten an extension on the Grand Jury was in the midst of interviewing key witnesses and then all of the sudden, target dates for the report appear on Amazon with forwards from Trump lackeys. I also have inside information, but you can glean from what is public the same thing.

Sure you do. I am sure we will hear all about it in the testimony. LOL!

^^^ Supports corruption

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew I wasn't supporting a saint but, I know the candidate I was supporting was the best choice for the America I love. So, shove your only patriots would vote for ABC BS where the sun doesn't shine. Thank you.

Did you know he was this much “not a saint”? Did you hope for better from him? Or do you think this isn’t such a big deal and the corrupt media and dems are making s**t up?

I knew his opponent was "this much not a saint" and so did Democrats. You all put that candidate up anyway! I read Lessig. I heard from Bernie supporters and you still put her up. I supported my America and will continue to do so unapologetically.

Ok. Fine. I get that you made the best decision you feel you could have then. How about now? Hillary is in the rear view mirror. How do you feel about the report and the finding that Trump is more corrupt/corruptible than you presumably imagined when you voted for him? Do you still support him?

DP here: I do support him. I didn't find anything new in the report that I didn't know before the election. I knew he was a businessman and he had prior dealings. If they rise to the level of criminal corruption, he should be prosecuted by DOJ. If DOJ chose not to prosecute him, it is on them. I am more concerned that after spending so much money on this investigation, now we will be spending more money on Congress investigation. It is time to move on.

Np- the entire point of the report is to give Congress the means to pursue. Literally the entire point. You shouldn’t be shrugging that off, and you shouldn’t be hoping congresses just “moves on”. The ball is in congresses court to do their jobs.

So, you believe that Congress can do something that Mueller and his high power attorneys and FBI agents were unable to do?

Are you serious? Yes, Mueller is a special counsel appointed by the executive. Under the US Constitution, the Congress has a duty to uphold the law and specifically as it applies to a sitting President.

Tell us about the high crimes and misdemeanors that were committed to warrant an impeachment.

Read the Mueller report. If you had read it, you wouldn't be asking the question.

If you believe that there is rationale within the Mueller report to head to impeachment, do it. Call your Congress reps. Encourage them to do it. Please.
It will not end well for you.

So you oppose the sworn duty of the Congress to uphold the rule of law. I guess I understand why the corruption in this Administration is thus acceptable to you.

[Anonymous]

Anyone else notice this footnote (the good stuff is always in the footnotes)? It appears there might have been compromising tapes of Trump? What does Michael Cohen say about that & what did Trump tell him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else notice this footnote (the good stuff is always in the footnotes)? It appears there might have been compromising tapes of Trump? What does Michael Cohen say about that & what did Trump tell him?

If there were tapes, we would have seen them already.
They don't exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I knew I wasn't supporting a saint but, I know the candidate I was supporting was the best choice for the America I love. So, shove your only patriots would vote for ABC BS where the sun doesn't shine. Thank you.

Did you know he was this much “not a saint”? Did you hope for better from him? Or do you think this isn’t such a big deal and the corrupt media and dems are making s**t up?

I knew his opponent was "this much not a saint" and so did Democrats. You all put that candidate up anyway! I read Lessig. I heard from Bernie supporters and you still put her up. I supported my America and will continue to do so unapologetically.

Ok. Fine. I get that you made the best decision you feel you could have then. How about now? Hillary is in the rear view mirror. How do you feel about the report and the finding that Trump is more corrupt/corruptible than you presumably imagined when you voted for him? Do you still support him?

DP here: I do support him. I didn't find anything new in the report that I didn't know before the election. I knew he was a businessman and he had prior dealings. If they rise to the level of criminal corruption, he should be prosecuted by DOJ. If DOJ chose not to prosecute him, it is on them. I am more concerned that after spending so much money on this investigation, now we will be spending more money on Congress investigation. It is time to move on.

Np- the entire point of the report is to give Congress the means to pursue. Literally the entire point. You shouldn’t be shrugging that off, and you shouldn’t be hoping congresses just “moves on”. The ball is in congresses court to do their jobs.

So, you believe that Congress can do something that Mueller and his high power attorneys and FBI agents were unable to do?

Are you serious? Yes, Mueller is a special counsel appointed by the executive. Under the US Constitution, the Congress has a duty to uphold the law and specifically as it applies to a sitting President.

Tell us about the high crimes and misdemeanors that were committed to warrant an impeachment.

Read the Mueller report. If you had read it, you wouldn't be asking the question.

If you believe that there is rationale within the Mueller report to head to impeachment, do it. Call your Congress reps. Encourage them to do it. Please.
It will not end well for you.

So you oppose the sworn duty of the Congress to uphold the rule of law. I guess I understand why the corruption in this Administration is thus acceptable to you.

As I said, if you believe there is rationale, go for it. As for corruption - LOL. You must have slept through the Obama years.
Which administration claimed executive privilege when it came to disclosing information? (Fast and Furious, anyone?)
You and I can disagree on what Congress' "duty" is here. Their "duty" is also to maintain confidential information as confidential, but Schiff and company have not seen that as a critical "duty."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The best summary of the Mueller report in multiple parts

https://terikanefield-blog.com/reading-the-mueller-report-part-i/

This should scare the crap out of any true, patriotic American.

THIS! The GOP and Trumpkins love their power and this moron more than they love this country. It's frightening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Not true. In fact Linsey Graham asked this exact same question to AG Barr in his latest hearing. It's puzzling to both the chairman and AG that FBI suspected at the time that Carter Page, George Papadopoulus and Manafort were working with Russians but they chose NOT to tell the Trump campaign about it. AG Barr testified that there were two former US attorneys working in the Trump campaign -- Rudy and Chris Christie. FBI could easily convey the message with those two. Unless FBI's goal all along was to frame American citizens and not stopping Russians.

OK, let's play a logic game here. You are the FBI and our allies abroad have captured first hand sourcing (ie on audio/video) of some of the names listed talking to Russians about the election, or they have captured Russians talking among themselves, citing some of the names above in their conversation. You are suggesting that rather than further the investigation, they should instead notify Trump that some of his people are being talked about by Russians or were talking to Russians?

That isn't how it works.

And Rudy is as dirty as it gets so I don't know why you cite him in some extolling manner. There is a reason Christie didn't join the Administration - he wasn't compromised or dirty enough.