Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always knew there would be an inevitable backlash to the MeToo Movement, but I certainly didn't want it to play out this way with an accused sexual predator, blackout drinker, partisan, liar appointed to the bench. Geez. This country is in the toilet. I'm not sure where we go from here. But definitely feel like a stranger in a strange land today.

All thinking, engaged women, I hope you will vote in the mid-terms.

As a thinking, engaged woman, I certainly will. But I won't necessarily vote the way you want.

DP - That is fine. You vote your way as long as it is informed. I always respect differing opinions and ideology as long as it is thoughtful and informed. That is the beauty of a democracy and I am grateful to live in one. I just fear that the guardrails of our delicate democracy is being chipped away by this administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

If you are not in their state they will not record your comments

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

Unless you vote in both their states, they won't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I assumed Feinstein would do her best to keep a perjurer and an sexual assault perpetrator off of our supreme court. So yes

I am confident we will not have a perjurer or sexual assault perpetrator on the SCOTUS.

So you think Mancin and Collins are both a "no" then, because anything else would be false, based on the evidence the FBI wasn't able to probe, but that has been made public.

The FBI spoke with people with first-hand knowledge. Everything else is heresy. And Ford DID change the date of her "assault" from the mid-80s to the early-80s.

lol The FBI didn't speak with Ford. All they have from her is heresy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I assumed Feinstein would do her best to keep a perjurer and an sexual assault perpetrator off of our supreme court. So yes

I am confident we will not have a perjurer or sexual assault perpetrator on the SCOTUS.

So you think Mancin and Collins are both a "no" then, because anything else would be false, based on the evidence the FBI wasn't able to probe, but that has been made public.

The FBI spoke with people with first-hand knowledge. Everything else is heresy. And Ford DID change the date of her "assault" from the mid-80s to the early-80s.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

Unless you vote in both their states, they won't care.

That is not necessarily true on a national issue such as this one. I know several people who have been staffers in Senate offices, both sides of the aisle, and they do indeed collect all data in and outside of their states on certain and critical policy issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

Unless you vote in both their states, they won't care.

That is not necessarily true on a national issue such as this one. I know several people who have been staffers in Senate offices, both sides of the aisle, and they do indeed collect all data in and outside of their states on certain and critical policy issues.

No, not at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I assumed Feinstein would do her best to keep a perjurer and an sexual assault perpetrator off of our supreme court. So yes

I am confident we will not have a perjurer or sexual assault perpetrator on the SCOTUS.

So you think Mancin and Collins are both a "no" then, because anything else would be false, based on the evidence the FBI wasn't able to probe, but that has been made public.

The FBI spoke with people with first-hand knowledge. Everything else is heresy. And Ford DID change the date of her "assault" from the mid-80s to the early-80s.

lol The FBI didn't speak with Ford. All they have from her is heresy.

But her voice doesn’t matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

Unless you vote in both their states, they won't care.

That is not necessarily true on a national issue such as this one. I know several people who have been staffers in Senate offices, both sides of the aisle, and they do indeed collect all data in and outside of their states on certain and critical policy issues.

No, not at all.

Yes, it does make a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

Unless you vote in both their states, they won't care.

That is not necessarily true on a national issue such as this one. I know several people who have been staffers in Senate offices, both sides of the aisle, and they do indeed collect all data in and outside of their states on certain and critical policy issues.

Manchin line was busy
Collins staff on another call and voice mail full.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I assumed Feinstein would do her best to keep a perjurer and an sexual assault perpetrator off of our supreme court. So yes

I am confident we will not have a perjurer or sexual assault perpetrator on the SCOTUS.

So you think Mancin and Collins are both a "no" then, because anything else would be false, based on the evidence the FBI wasn't able to probe, but that has been made public.

The FBI spoke with people with first-hand knowledge. Everything else is heresy. And Ford DID change the date of her "assault" from the mid-80s to the early-80s.

lol The FBI didn't speak with Ford. All they have from her is heresy.

But her voice doesn’t matter.

Don't you know, facts DO matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I assumed Feinstein would do her best to keep a perjurer and an sexual assault perpetrator off of our supreme court. So yes

I am confident we will not have a perjurer or sexual assault perpetrator on the SCOTUS.

So you think Mancin and Collins are both a "no" then, because anything else would be false, based on the evidence the FBI wasn't able to probe, but that has been made public.

The FBI spoke with people with first-hand knowledge. Everything else is heresy. And Ford DID change the date of her "assault" from the mid-80s to the early-80s.

lol The FBI didn't speak with Ford. All they have from her is heresy.

But her voice doesn’t matter.

Don't you know, facts DO matter.

Heresy doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should I call manchin and Collins ?

I sent them emails.

Unless you vote in both their states, they won't care.

That is not necessarily true on a national issue such as this one. I know several people who have been staffers in Senate offices, both sides of the aisle, and they do indeed collect all data in and outside of their states on certain and critical policy issues.

Manchin line was busy
Collins staff on another call and voice mail full.

Keep trying so you'll have something to do all day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always knew there would be an inevitable backlash to the MeToo Movement, but I certainly didn't want it to play out this way with an accused sexual predator, blackout drinker, partisan, liar appointed to the bench. Geez. This country is in the toilet. I'm not sure where we go from here. But definitely feel like a stranger in a strange land today.

All thinking, engaged women, I hope you will vote in the mid-terms.

As a thinking, engaged woman, I certainly will. But I won't necessarily vote the way you want.

DP - That is fine. You vote your way as long as it is informed. I always respect differing opinions and ideology as long as it is thoughtful and informed. That is the beauty of a democracy and I am grateful to live in one. I just fear that the guardrails of our delicate democracy is being chipped away by this administration.

Thank you. I do consider myself highly informed, although my interpretation and prioritization of issues are not usually in alignment with liberals.

As far as chipping away at democracy, I fear a bad precedent will be set if we switch to a presumption of guilt among those accused of crimes. And while I know fully well this is not a criminal trial, neither is it a simple "job interview" as some would have you believe. My opinion is that the president's nominee for the SCOTUS should be confirmed, excepting some heinous act that was proven to be true.

[Anonymous]

Hearsay not heresy, idiot.