Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle Controversy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

Hah! You can stop beating the dead horse. Irony is really, truly dead now. No need to continue.

Just stating facts. That’s why the movie flopped, along with her career. It was poor woke casting. And she’s not pretty and the storyline was she’s the most beautiful in all of the land. That’s more subjective though, but she’s definitely not white as snow. Feel bad that role will haunt her for life. Sydney will always have great jeans.

LOL I guess that's the irony part? People who flaunt it with that kind of mean attitide are exactly they type people love, just love, watching get old.

How’s that irony? She will always have great Jeans She did a great ad & will be remembered for it like Cindy Crawford is remembered for the Pepsi ad. How well she ages is irrelevant.

The word is "genes" not "jeans." How do you know she will always have great jeans? Is a lifetime supply part of her pay for doing the ad?

You might be the dumbest person on DCUM. I said jeans I meant JEANS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The message is you’re stupid and fool of fake outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

[Anonymous]

I feel bad for Sweeney. She did not make the commercial. She was just a paid actor. Let her be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

Hah! You can stop beating the dead horse. Irony is really, truly dead now. No need to continue.

Just stating facts. That’s why the movie flopped, along with her career. It was poor woke casting. And she’s not pretty and the storyline was she’s the most beautiful in all of the land. That’s more subjective though, but she’s definitely not white as snow. Feel bad that role will haunt her for life. Sydney will always have great jeans.

LOL I guess that's the irony part? People who flaunt it with that kind of mean attitide are exactly they type people love, just love, watching get old.

How’s that irony? She will always have great Jeans She did a great ad & will be remembered for it like Cindy Crawford is remembered for the Pepsi ad. How well she ages is irrelevant.

The word is "genes" not "jeans." How do you know she will always have great jeans? Is a lifetime supply part of her pay for doing the ad?

You might be the dumbest person on DCUM. I said jeans I meant JEANS.

So how is she always going to have good JEANS? Is she going to be a 70 year old woman still wearing JEANS? Doubtful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

Nobody in here has admitted to shopping at or even buying these jeans before. So if they don’t like the ad, and didn’t shop there before, who cares? Obviously they weren’t the target market.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

Nobody in here has admitted to shopping at or even buying these jeans before. So if they don’t like the ad, and didn’t shop there before, who cares? Obviously they weren’t the target market.

I used to but now my kids are out of high school and on to other brands. But I would absolutely avoid it if they were still interested.

It reminds me of when I walked into Brandy Melville not understanding that they only had one size. I quickly found that out..... hell no .....none of my money for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

Nobody in here has admitted to shopping at or even buying these jeans before. So if they don’t like the ad, and didn’t shop there before, who cares? Obviously they weren’t the target market.

I have bought their jeans before several years ago. I stopped buying them because the my sizes and cuts were always out of stock.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

Yes you get a "MAGA" cap made out of denim with a big eagle on it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

Yes you get a "MAGA" cap made out of denim with a big eagle on it!

Okay perfect ad. They knew how to sell to their "genetically superior" customers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The message is you’re stupid and fool of fake outrage.

You are fool of yourself, troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

I don’t know about MAGA but this was a poor ad for its brand. Young girls (the target audience) don’t like Sweeney. This is why the outrage must be AE manufactured or the target is to sell men’s clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

Give your hard on cash to this company if you think it's a great ad. No one is stopping you. Why don't you buy a Tesla while you're at it?

Boycotts only work if the people who don’t like the ad were customers in the first place. Ask Bud Light.

Why is this a Maga brand? Do they give you a hat with your pair of jeans? Then maybe this is the perfect ad campaign.

It is true that Elon musk's approach was a real head scratcher. Maga was not the customer base for Teslas and yet he went full Maga and now has no customers for his cars. go figure

Nobody in here has admitted to shopping at or even buying these jeans before. So if they don’t like the ad, and didn’t shop there before, who cares? Obviously they weren’t the target market.

Do you understand that a store in decline needs to expand its customer base?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

Good grief. You have serious problems. There was a Jean ad not too long ago featuring Beyoncé. No outrage over that.
Truth is the left has caused this ad campaign to truly succeed because of your insane outrage.

Is the right really this dumb? You honestly don't understand that the complaint is about the MESSAGE and not the skin, face, body or boobs?

The "genes" thing is a play on words nothing more nothing less. Everything is not that deep.

I am starting to think AE started the controversy to drive attention to the brand.

Yes, it's a play on words. Good genes/jeans. Her jeans are BLUE -- extrapolate to blue genes, eyes. I so hope Hitler comes back so he can sterilize all the low IQ population, including the dull PP above and Ye. What a joke Ye thinks Hitler would want him around. I would love to see him run in for a hug.

I took the good genes to mean that she's objectively attractive and therefore must have had good genes. It would be the same if it was an attractive model or actress of a different ethnicity. The thing is she is about the hottest actress of her generation right now. I am 50, and the only actresses in their twenties that I know are her and Zendaya. And I have never even seen their TV show, so the reason I know them is because of coverage in mainstream media.

“The thing is she is about the hottest actress of her generation right now.”

You made me actually laugh out loud. I hope you are getting paid for that major shill job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for Sweeney. She did not make the commercial. She was just a paid actor. Let her be.

I posted pages ago that I don’t begrudge Sweeney trying to make a buck. But she’s gotta deal with the fallout of how she chose to make the buck.