Epstein Files

Anonymous
Anonymous
Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged


Exactly.

This is what the morons believe in..."oh crap!!! We forgot to erase the video of James Comey in the Epstein room!!" " Now Trump has it!!"

It's level 3 fantasy land.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

This is a tempest in a teapot. The group who believes in Epstein conspiracies is minuscule compared to the millions of disgruntled Americans who voted for Trump in 2024, primarily due to inflation, and secondarily, due to rascism (spooked by fear of criminal migrants, just like the Nazi playbook pre-WWII).

Most Trump voters do not care about Epstein.
People think they do, because unsurprisingly, the Epstein-was-killed bunch are a raucous group on the internet. Now that they're fighting with the Trump White House, the mainstream media is making it look like the entire right is imploding, but it's not. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS. As usual, the media is exaggerating the fallout. This isn't Trump's moment of reckoning. All the crazies will just fall in line again, grumpily. It's not like they'd ever vote for Democrats, now, is it?

The only possible gain for Democrats is that fewer people will turn out on the right for the midterms. The single-issue, ex-QAnon, current-Epstein voter will just stay home. You know how few people that it? Lower turnout on the right was already predicted based on the criteria that ACTUALLY MATTER, ie, the ECONOMY.

If you want to predict the next election, read about how tariffs are causing inflation, even today, and how it will only get worse.


Anything that disillusions Maga is a good thing. Anything that rattles Trump is a good thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged


There is no "deep state" -- or at least there wasn't until the Trump admin declared federal employees to be the enemy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged


There is no "deep state" -- or at least there wasn't until the Trump admin declared federal employees to be the enemy.


Correct. If MAGA were at all logical in their made-up universe, they'd see that Trump is now the "deep state".
Anonymous
Former MAGAs are now looking at nepo baby turned fanatic Zionist Bill Ackman and his deeply suspicious Israeli second wife.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged


There is no "deep state" -- or at least there wasn't until the Trump admin declared federal employees to be the enemy.


Correct. If MAGA were at all logical in their made-up universe, they'd see that Trump is now the "deep state".


Most of the MAGAs with some semblance of a brain are now confessing just that. Trump doesn’t care and the controlled opposition GOP don’t care if they lose a few in the 2026 midterms. The charade goes on.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged


There is no "deep state" -- or at least there wasn't until the Trump admin declared federal employees to be the enemy.


What? Are you forgetting Russiagare? Come on be serious.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Former MAGAs are now looking at nepo baby turned fanatic Zionist Bill Ackman and his deeply suspicious Israeli second wife.


How I would love for MAGA to take down Ackman. Andreeson too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

This is a tempest in a teapot. The group who believes in Epstein conspiracies is minuscule compared to the millions of disgruntled Americans who voted for Trump in 2024, primarily due to inflation, and secondarily, due to rascism (spooked by fear of criminal migrants, just like the Nazi playbook pre-WWII).

Most Trump voters do not care about Epstein.
People think they do, because unsurprisingly, the Epstein-was-killed bunch are a raucous group on the internet. Now that they're fighting with the Trump White House, the mainstream media is making it look like the entire right is imploding, but it's not. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS. As usual, the media is exaggerating the fallout. This isn't Trump's moment of reckoning. All the crazies will just fall in line again, grumpily. It's not like they'd ever vote for Democrats, now, is it?

The only possible gain for Democrats is that fewer people will turn out on the right for the midterms. The single-issue, ex-QAnon, current-Epstein voter will just stay home. You know how few people that it? Lower turnout on the right was already predicted based on the criteria that ACTUALLY MATTER, ie, the ECONOMY.

If you want to predict the next election, read about how tariffs are causing inflation, even today, and how it will only get worse.



True. But it does highlight the complete whack jobs Trump installed and their bizarre side shows. I have some small sliver of hope that this is another factor that will turn the moneyed class against Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is..

There is no way the deep state doesn't destroy incriminating or deep state destructive information regarding

Epstein
JFK assassination
911

Etc...

People who believe there is a treasure trove of bombshell evidence regarding these type of events must think the deep state is mentally challenged


"Deep State" is political theater for political outsiders. It's all fun and games to make up conspiracies about what's going on inside the government when you're outside of government as Trump was while he was campaigning.

But now he IS the government. He's the one in charge, he IS the the one above the Deep State, if there ever was such a thing. "Deep State" deflections no longer make any sense for Trump supporters to shift blame to.
Anonymous
The political scandals and machinations happen at the superficial, political-appointee level.

The idea that a broad and deep swath of the federal workforce acts with clandestine, political motivations on the job was a fabrication of the GOP political class.

And, yes, by accusing an apolitical workforce of malfeasance, they have bred resentment and risk generating exactly the kind of behavior they falsely alleged.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Russiagate. President Trump first oresidenicy was basically an attack on him. It was horrible and not true. You do not have to like him to conclude that we cannot be going after people based on politics.


Here's the problem with "Russiagate" -

I am not a Trump supporter. I hate the guy. I've hated the guy since the 1990s, when he was a notorious scammer and con man known to us working in land development in the NYC area.

But that said I have never believed he knowingly or intentionally colluded with Russia. I don't believe he takes orders from the Kremlin, and am skeptical of suggestions that Putin is blackmailing him etc. But that said I DO think there are two problem areas:

1. Russia ABSOLUTELY DID try to manipulate our elections, through social media, disinfo campaigns et cetera - and they continue to do so now.

2. Trump may well have unwittingly and unknowingly colluded with Russia by being their useful idiot for going along with some of the themes and sentiments that were part of the Russian disinfo/propaganda meddling in our elections.

So I agree when people say "Trump did not collude with Russia" - to the extent that he probably did not overtly or knowingly do so.

But I DISAGREE with people who want to just proclaim "Russiagate is not a thing" and slam the book shut on Russian interference or claims that Russia did not help Trump get elected, because there's plenty of evidence of Russia's meddling. And what's additionally problematic there is that Trump got so hysterical over the "Russiagate" stuff that he refused to so much as even allow it to be looked into during his term, leaving us open to even more Russian meddling and interference.

I refuse to close the book on it and you need to adjust your thinking and definition beyond "Trump directly colluded with Russia" if you want to deal with truths.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The political scandals and machinations happen at the superficial, political-appointee level.

The idea that a broad and deep swath of the federal workforce acts with clandestine, political motivations on the job was a fabrication of the GOP political class.

And, yes, by accusing an apolitical workforce of malfeasance, they have bred resentment and risk generating exactly the kind of behavior they falsely alleged.


Yes, the worse-yet part is that Trump wants to replace apolitical people who swore their oath of appointment from administration to administration to consistently uphold the constitution with people who instead swear an oath to Trump. He would actually be creating a Deep State where previously there was none.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: