Epstein Files

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t pry more info out of Ghislaine.


She will be quietly"extradited " to Israel when things quiet down in couple of years where she will have access to the hidden billions.

She was sentenced to 20 years.


Wanna bet she’s released soon?


Can her lawyers use this "there's no list" situation to get her released or a retrial?

Exactly, there must be a way to make her talk, solitary confinement etc. also can we find more victims, unsure they’d even be able to identify their abusers though. Were the victims only Americans?

So you want to waterboard her in your etc scenario. Look, if the woman was going to talk she would have already done it. She saw what happened to Epstein and she did not want to join him. Also, she was not sentenced to the maximum allowable prison time, and I agree with the earlier poster. Before his term is out, Trump will extradite Maxwell to Israel, but that cannot happen as long as people continue to talk about Epstein and his list.

She was trafficking these 100s of underage girls to someone. Why can’t she be placed in solitary confinement or something until we get this information?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t pry more info out of Ghislaine.


She will be quietly"extradited " to Israel when things quiet down in couple of years where she will have access to the hidden billions.

She was sentenced to 20 years.


Wanna bet she’s released soon?


Can her lawyers use this "there's no list" situation to get her released or a retrial?

Exactly, there must be a way to make her talk, solitary confinement etc. also can we find more victims, unsure they’d even be able to identify their abusers though. Were the victims only Americans?

So you want to waterboard her in your etc scenario. Look, if the woman was going to talk she would have already done it. She saw what happened to Epstein and she did not want to join him. Also, she was not sentenced to the maximum allowable prison time, and I agree with the earlier poster. Before his term is out, Trump will extradite Maxwell to Israel, but that cannot happen as long as people continue to talk about Epstein and his list.

We gain absolutely nothing then from having her imprisoned. It’s a waste, just release her today.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t pry more info out of Ghislaine.


She will be quietly"extradited " to Israel when things quiet down in couple of years where she will have access to the hidden billions.

She was sentenced to 20 years.


Wanna bet she’s released soon?


Can her lawyers use this "there's no list" situation to get her released or a retrial?

Exactly, there must be a way to make her talk, solitary confinement etc. also can we find more victims, unsure they’d even be able to identify their abusers though. Were the victims only Americans?

So you want to waterboard her in your etc scenario. Look, if the woman was going to talk she would have already done it. She saw what happened to Epstein and she did not want to join him. Also, she was not sentenced to the maximum allowable prison time, and I agree with the earlier poster. Before his term is out, Trump will extradite Maxwell to Israel, but that cannot happen as long as people continue to talk about Epstein and his list.

We gain absolutely nothing then from having her imprisoned. It’s a waste, just release her today.


I just don't expect her to have anything rational to say anyway. She clearly has a warped mind to have been the toady that she was. it would honestly be easier to think that she was involved as an intelligence agent rather than someone who just desperately wanted Epstein's approval, but so far the facts indicate the latter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t pry more info out of Ghislaine.


She will be quietly"extradited " to Israel when things quiet down in couple of years where she will have access to the hidden billions.

She was sentenced to 20 years.


Wanna bet she’s released soon?


Can her lawyers use this "there's no list" situation to get her released or a retrial?

Exactly, there must be a way to make her talk, solitary confinement etc. also can we find more victims, unsure they’d even be able to identify their abusers though. Were the victims only Americans?

So you want to waterboard her in your etc scenario. Look, if the woman was going to talk she would have already done it. She saw what happened to Epstein and she did not want to join him. Also, she was not sentenced to the maximum allowable prison time, and I agree with the earlier poster. Before his term is out, Trump will extradite Maxwell to Israel, but that cannot happen as long as people continue to talk about Epstein and his list.

We gain absolutely nothing then from having her imprisoned. It’s a waste, just release her today.


I think her many victims would beg to differ.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ro Khanna forcing vote to release.

I guess that we will find out who votes against it.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/12/2333154/-Ro-Khanna-introducing-amendment-to-force-vote-on-Epstein-files


Ro Khanna is backed by Big Tech money. It’s the same people that have JD Vance in their pocket.

Folks, they are making moves to dump Trump. And it started ginning up as soon as they passed the BBB. They don’t need Trump anymore. They hate Stephen Miller’s immigration stance. They are not reflexively aligned with Israel.

Either two things happen:
-Dotard Trump resigns because he’s weak and boxed in

Or

-Trump has his Night of the Long Knives


This year is only going to get crazier
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t pry more info out of Ghislaine.


She will be quietly"extradited " to Israel when things quiet down in couple of years where she will have access to the hidden billions.

She was sentenced to 20 years.


Wanna bet she’s released soon?


Can her lawyers use this "there's no list" situation to get her released or a retrial?

Exactly, there must be a way to make her talk, solitary confinement etc. also can we find more victims, unsure they’d even be able to identify their abusers though. Were the victims only Americans?

So you want to waterboard her in your etc scenario. Look, if the woman was going to talk she would have already done it. She saw what happened to Epstein and she did not want to join him. Also, she was not sentenced to the maximum allowable prison time, and I agree with the earlier poster. Before his term is out, Trump will extradite Maxwell to Israel, but that cannot happen as long as people continue to talk about Epstein and his list.

We gain absolutely nothing then from having her imprisoned. It’s a waste, just release her today.


I think her many victims would beg to differ.

Agree but we also need extract as much we can out of her while imprisoned or at least try.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I love how Trump is tying to blame Hillary, Hunter and the everybody else for the Epstein files, but didn’t the whole Epstein fiasco go down under Trump? The fact that he is blaming the Dems suggests there may be something “untoward” in those files. Lol


The Dems cannot be blamed. Bondi had the files and said so. She hosted a big event for conservative pundits, podcasters and so on, to talk about the files, redacting them and releasing them. She gave them each a big binder of released documents, and told them this was just phase 1 and that much more was to come.

And now she's done a complete 180 turn, even going as far as to say there's nothing there, nothing to release. That could not happen because of "Democrats." Trump's administration had everything, all the files. And now they are claiming there's nothing, and are trying to memoryhole the entire thing and just make it go away, and pretend it ever existed in the first place. This is THEIR doing, not "Democrats."

If "Democrats" were to blame, we'd instead be hearing Bondi screaming that Democrats destroyed the files and she'd be announcing investigations, arrests, and prosecutions. But that's not at all what's happening. It's the Trump administration that is trying to disappear the files. And now they will try like crazy to distract us from it, gaslight us into believing "oh there never was any list, there are no files, Epstein didn't keep any records" and so on, when we've already seen his Little Black Book, his flight logs, and tons of other things, along with the multiple court cases which Trump himself and others have been trying to squash.

And what about those who could tell the tale- Virginia Giuffre etc? Suppressed. If it was really about "Democrats" or "Clinton" trying to keep the Epstein matter silenced, then the Trump administration would instead be weaponizing it and DoJ would be all over those cases to move them forward. But instead, silence, and witnesses dying off under questionable circumstances.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ro Khanna forcing vote to release.

I guess that we will find out who votes against it.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/12/2333154/-Ro-Khanna-introducing-amendment-to-force-vote-on-Epstein-files


Ro Khanna is backed by Big Tech money. It’s the same people that have JD Vance in their pocket.

Folks, they are making moves to dump Trump. And it started ginning up as soon as they passed the BBB. They don’t need Trump anymore. They hate Stephen Miller’s immigration stance. They are not reflexively aligned with Israel.

Either two things happen:
-Dotard Trump resigns because he’s weak and boxed in

Or

-Trump has his Night of the Long Knives


This year is only going to get crazier


I think that our most immediate concerns are Trump (and whoever controls him) and Miller. If we start by getting rid of those two then we move on to dealing with the next level jerkoffs.

I agree, though, they are putting Trump out to pasture.
Anonymous
If the Epstein files cleared Trump, he would have released them long since.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Just for screenplay purposes
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t pry more info out of Ghislaine.


She will be quietly"extradited " to Israel when things quiet down in couple of years where she will have access to the hidden billions.

She was sentenced to 20 years.


Wanna bet she’s released soon?


Can her lawyers use this "there's no list" situation to get her released or a retrial?

Exactly, there must be a way to make her talk, solitary confinement etc. also can we find more victims, unsure they’d even be able to identify their abusers though. Were the victims only Americans?

So you want to waterboard her in your etc scenario. Look, if the woman was going to talk she would have already done it. She saw what happened to Epstein and she did not want to join him. Also, she was not sentenced to the maximum allowable prison time, and I agree with the earlier poster. Before his term is out, Trump will extradite Maxwell to Israel, but that cannot happen as long as people continue to talk about Epstein and his list.

We gain absolutely nothing then from having her imprisoned. It’s a waste, just release her today.


You don't understand the justice system. Imprisonment is punishment for crimes committed. It's not a way to extract information. You are not supposed to torture people to get info, A, because it's inhumane and we don't support that, even for criminals, and B, because data shows that torture makes people say whatever their tormentor wants to hear and is therefore not reliable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ro Khanna forcing vote to release.

I guess that we will find out who votes against it.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/12/2333154/-Ro-Khanna-introducing-amendment-to-force-vote-on-Epstein-files


Ro Khanna is backed by Big Tech money. It’s the same people that have JD Vance in their pocket.

Folks, they are making moves to dump Trump. And it started ginning up as soon as they passed the BBB. They don’t need Trump anymore. They hate Stephen Miller’s immigration stance. They are not reflexively aligned with Israel.

Either two things happen:
-Dotard Trump resigns because he’s weak and boxed in

Or

-Trump has his Night of the Long Knives


This year is only going to get crazier

For anyone thinking a Vance presidency would be somehow less horrible than Trump, let me remind you that Vance supports ADF, the German far right party. Vance, Curtis Yarvin & Thiel want a tech monarchy. They are just as horrible but in a different way. Now, maybe Vance won’t have the juice to keep this crown but until Dems get their act together we’re still on a fast slide to authoritarianism.
Anonymous


This is a tempest in a teapot. The group who believes in Epstein conspiracies is minuscule compared to the millions of disgruntled Americans who voted for Trump in 2024, primarily due to inflation, and secondarily, due to rascism (spooked by fear of criminal migrants, just like the Nazi playbook pre-WWII).

Most Trump voters do not care about Epstein.
People think they do, because unsurprisingly, the Epstein-was-killed bunch are a raucous group on the internet. Now that they're fighting with the Trump White House, the mainstream media is making it look like the entire right is imploding, but it's not. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS. As usual, the media is exaggerating the fallout. This isn't Trump's moment of reckoning. All the crazies will just fall in line again, grumpily. It's not like they'd ever vote for Democrats, now, is it?

The only possible gain for Democrats is that fewer people will turn out on the right for the midterms. The single-issue, ex-QAnon, current-Epstein voter will just stay home. You know how few people that it? Lower turnout on the right was already predicted based on the criteria that ACTUALLY MATTER, ie, the ECONOMY.

If you want to predict the next election, read about how tariffs are causing inflation, even today, and how it will only get worse.

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: