Nicole Shanahan says RFK Jr. campaign considering joining forces with Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because

1) he is insane
2) is an anti-vaxer, which kind of goes against science and rationality germane to an NIH, FDA and HHS that function properly

I didn't say she had to put him in charge of policy but she could have talked to the guy and kept him under her wing at least until after the election

Instead, she sicked her law-dogs on the guy and sued him in every state. Real nice.

Nice way to treat a fellow democrat. And now he is the terrible one?!?

Not a Democrat. He ran as an Independent. And Republicans whining about using the Courts to limit ballot access? Seriously?

Yes - seriously: the democrats have taken the low road and resorted to underhanded lawfare.

Your party did it. Now own it.

Like it or not, it’s true that Democrats have used lawfare fare more often over the last 4 years:

“ Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their legal rights. The term may refer to the use of legal systems and principles against an enemy, such as by damaging or delegitimizing them, wasting their time and money (e.g., strategic lawsuits against public participation), or winning a public relations victory. Alternatively, it may describe a tactic used by repressive regimes to label and discourage civil society or individuals from claiming their legal rights via national or international legal systems.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is nice and all, but didn’t he go to Kamala first seeking a role in her administration and got told to pound sand?

He stated this fact explicitly during his address yesterday.

And yet, someone up-thread is attempting to label this “spin” ?? I don’t think they know what “spin” means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The energy was phenomenal!!

Regardless of anyone's opinion of RFK Jr and his views on any topic, it would take a lot of guts to go against multiple generations of his entire family and side with Trump.

Guts? No. The dude is so desperate for attention he literally sold his soul to the devil.

I'm guessing your family isn't a powerful dynasty with a last name that's recognized almost everywhere and revered by Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because

1) he is insane
2) is an anti-vaxer, which kind of goes against science and rationality germane to an NIH, FDA and HHS that function properly

I didn't say she had to put him in charge of policy but she could have talked to the guy and kept him under her wing at least until after the election

Instead, she sicked her law-dogs on the guy and sued him in every state. Real nice.

Nice way to treat a fellow democrat. And now he is the terrible one?!?

Not a Democrat. He ran as an Independent. And Republicans whining about using the Courts to limit ballot access? Seriously?

Yes - seriously: the democrats have taken the low road and resorted to underhanded lawfare.

Your party did it. Now own it.

Like it or not, it’s true that Democrats have used lawfare fare more often over the last 4 years:

“ Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their legal rights. The term may refer to the use of legal systems and principles against an enemy, such as by damaging or delegitimizing them, wasting their time and money (e.g., strategic lawsuits against public participation), or winning a public relations victory. Alternatively, it may describe a tactic used by repressive regimes to label and discourage civil society or individuals from claiming their legal rights via national or international legal systems.”

The GOP deliberately appointed forced birther justices to SCOTUS to overturn roe and they did it. Apparently RFKJ is on board with this and is trying to get anti-women tyrant trump reelected. This is what those two want the legal system to do women in this country and they are repulsive to many voters because of it. They need to be kept out of women's private business

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because

1) he is insane
2) is an anti-vaxer, which kind of goes against science and rationality germane to an NIH, FDA and HHS that function properly

I didn't say she had to put him in charge of policy but she could have talked to the guy and kept him under her wing at least until after the election

Instead, she sicked her law-dogs on the guy and sued him in every state. Real nice.

Nice way to treat a fellow democrat. And now he is the terrible one?!?

Not a Democrat. He ran as an Independent. And Republicans whining about using the Courts to limit ballot access? Seriously?

Yes - seriously: the democrats have taken the low road and resorted to underhanded lawfare.

Your party did it. Now own it.

Like it or not, it’s true that Democrats have used lawfare fare more often over the last 4 years:

“ Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their legal rights. The term may refer to the use of legal systems and principles against an enemy, such as by damaging or delegitimizing them, wasting their time and money (e.g., strategic lawsuits against public participation), or winning a public relations victory. Alternatively, it may describe a tactic used by repressive regimes to label and discourage civil society or individuals from claiming their legal rights via national or international legal systems.”

The GOP deliberately appointed forced birther justices to SCOTUS to overturn roe and they did it. Apparently RFKJ is on board with this and is trying to get anti-women tyrant trump reelected. This is what those two want the legal system to do women in this country and they are repulsive to many voters because of it. They need to be kept out of women's private business

Response is a complete non sequitur.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The energy was phenomenal!!

Everything they do has a taint of impropriety and a sheen of slime. They didn’t even have permission to use the song.

“A spokesperson for Foo Fighters told Billboard on Friday that the Trump campaign did not ask for permission to use the song and “would not have granted it” if they were.

The spokesperson noted that “appropriate actions are being taken” against the Trump campaign and royalties the band receives due to its usage would be donated to the Harris campaign.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/foo-fighters-trump-my-hero-rfk-jr-rally_n_66c965cee4b0a191f3d00e3a/amp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because

1) he is insane
2) is an anti-vaxer, which kind of goes against science and rationality germane to an NIH, FDA and HHS that function properly

I didn't say she had to put him in charge of policy but she could have talked to the guy and kept him under her wing at least until after the election

Instead, she sicked her law-dogs on the guy and sued him in every state. Real nice.

Nice way to treat a fellow democrat. And now he is the terrible one?!?

Not a Democrat. He ran as an Independent. And Republicans whining about using the Courts to limit ballot access? Seriously?

Yes - seriously: the democrats have taken the low road and resorted to underhanded lawfare.

Your party did it. Now own it.

Like it or not, it’s true that Democrats have used lawfare fare more often over the last 4 years:

“ Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual's usage of their legal rights. The term may refer to the use of legal systems and principles against an enemy, such as by damaging or delegitimizing them, wasting their time and money (e.g., strategic lawsuits against public participation), or winning a public relations victory. Alternatively, it may describe a tactic used by repressive regimes to label and discourage civil society or individuals from claiming their legal rights via national or international legal systems.”

The GOP deliberately appointed forced birther justices to SCOTUS to overturn roe and they did it. Apparently RFKJ is on board with this and is trying to get anti-women tyrant trump reelected. This is what those two want the legal system to do women in this country and they are repulsive to many voters because of it. They need to be kept out of women's private business

The GOP will pay the consequences for overturning roe on election day. Nothing RFKJ can do about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The energy was phenomenal!!

Regardless of anyone's opinion of RFK Jr and his views on any topic, it would take a lot of guts to go against multiple generations of his entire family and side with Trump.

Guts? No. The dude is so desperate for attention he literally sold his soul to the devil.

I'm guessing your family isn't a powerful dynasty with a last name that's recognized almost everywhere and revered by Democrats.

Well, yes, you guess correctly. But that doesn’t change the fact that the dude is desperate for attention and will do anything for it.

[Anonymous]

RFK's family does not support him. That is very telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The energy was phenomenal!!

Regardless of anyone's opinion of RFK Jr and his views on any topic, it would take a lot of guts to go against multiple generations of his entire family and side with Trump.

Trump offered him a cabinet position while the Democrats know to stay away from the toxic brain worm bear massacring drug addict. This is hardly a profile in courage

+1

[Anonymous]

Sounds like most of you didn’t even listen to the historic speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like most of you didn’t even listen to the historic speech.

I don't listen to loons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like most of you didn’t even listen to the historic speech.

I don't listen to loons.

Your loss, commie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like most of you didn’t even listen to the historic speech.

I don't listen to loons.

Your loss, commie

DP. Oh wow, sure, now that's convincing me. You betcha.

[Anonymous]

I’m just here for the Democrat meltdown