IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!


This is big news.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!


Dem here, and I don't GAF about HB. Let the justice system play out as it should in his case and every other case.

But I'm curious if you'll be just as gleeful when further indictments come in for orange Jesus. Here's the current status of the civil and criminal cases he faces:

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/20/1185762259/trump-criminal-civil-cases-lawsuits


The bolded part is the entire problem!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yep



Did trumps kids get protection? Who the f follows people like this?


Yes, Trump's kids had the same.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yep



Did trumps kids get protection? Who the f follows people like this?


Yes, Trump's kids had the same.


Oh no… Trump made it so his kids got protection after he left, and that’s not usual.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This amicus brief I read has no personal information on the corrupt man. More lies and diversion by DCUM for a sweetheart deal. The lawyers representing him should get sanctions!



The attachments are chock full of his personal financial details.


It took YEARS to get Trump's personal financial details, despite him being a public official who is supposed to be transparent and disclose his finances. Whereas it only took far less to get Hunter's and put them on blast - and he's a private individual.

Meanwhile, the disclosure of Trump's also proved that he was engaging in all kinds of tax and loan fraud by maintaining separate sets of books, and those prosecutions, despite being years in the making are still being slow-walked and are still a ways out to trial, whereas Hunter's are being fast tracked.

Want to talk about "weaponization?" The weaponry is clearly being used far more aggressively on Hunter than it was on Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!


Dem here, and I don't GAF about HB. Let the justice system play out as it should in his case and every other case.

But I'm curious if you'll be just as gleeful when further indictments come in for orange Jesus. Here's the current status of the civil and criminal cases he faces:

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/20/1185762259/trump-criminal-civil-cases-lawsuits


The bolded part is the entire problem!


Why haven't the Trump prosecutions been playing out as they should?
Anonymous
All the political interference in this case from Republicans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!


Dem here, and I don't GAF about HB. Let the justice system play out as it should in his case and every other case.

But I'm curious if you'll be just as gleeful when further indictments come in for orange Jesus. Here's the current status of the civil and criminal cases he faces:

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/20/1185762259/trump-criminal-civil-cases-lawsuits


The bolded part is the entire problem!


But is it really a problem? The judge appointed to the HB case is currently questioning "a provision in the plea deal that contained details about not prosecuting Hunter Biden for any future tax crimes." I looked her up and she's a Trump appointee but "had the support of both Democratic senators from Delaware when she was nominated by Trump. Under the Senate’s so-called blue slip tradition, nominees for district court seats must have the support of the home state senators to move forward." Sounds to me like she's doing her job. Let's sit back and see what happens.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yep



Did trumps kids get protection? Who the f follows people like this?


Yes, Trump's kids had the same.


Oh no… Trump made it so his kids got protection after he left, and that’s not usual.


Correct. "In the days before he left office, President Donald Trump instructed that his family get the best security available in the world for the next six months, at no cost — the protection of the U.S. Secret Service. Trump issued a directive to extend post-presidency Secret Service protection to his four adult children and two of their spouses, who were not automatically entitled to receive it. Trump also directed that three key officials leaving government continue to receive the protection for six months: former treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin, former chief of staff Mark Meadows and former national security adviser Robert C. O’Brien. Under federal law, Trump, his wife, Melania Trump, and their 14-year-old son are the only members of his immediate family entitled to Secret Service protection after they leave office. The couple will receive it for their lifetimes, and Barron is entitled to protection until he turns 16."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-extended-secret-service-protection-for-13-members-of-his-family-as-he-left-office/2021/01/20/31ef3e9e-5b3c-11eb-b8bd-ee36b1cd18bf_story.html#:~:text=Under%20federal%20law%2C%20Trump%2C%20his,protection%20until%20he%20turns%2016.
Anonymous



Again from NYT's Glenn Thrush reporting from the courtroom. From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the kind of deal being proposed, he replied, “No, your honor.”
Anonymous
It’s going to be super ironic if the GOP succeeds in blowing up this plea deal and the prosecutors are forced to drop all of the charges because of all the misconduct by these investigators.
Anonymous
Deal back on
Anonymous
Plea deal was not accepted.

Judge did not accept the constitutionality of the diversion clause.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Deal back on


Wrong... NO PLEA DEAL. Hunter Biden just pleaded "NOT guilty" in Delaware court after federal judge refuses to rubber-stamp sweetheart deal, tells prosecutors and defense lawyers she can neither accept nor deny his guilty plea at this point due to ambiguities.

Cue the "Trump appointed judge" bashing.
Anonymous
Judge says gun deal for Hunter Biden is "unusual"
From CNN's Tierney Sneed, Marshall Cohen, Kara Scannell, Holmes Lybrand
US District Judge Maryellen Noreika called the deal federal prosecutors reached with Hunter Biden for his gun possession offense “unusual.”

She said the deal — in which Biden would enter the diversion program to resolve the charge — contains some "non-standard terms," such as "broad immunity" from other potential charges.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/politics/live-news/hunter-biden-tax-charges-hearing/index.html
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: