IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

WHY is there even a "GOP Lawyer" allowed to be in the mix here?

This is not a civil matter between two arbitrary parties. This is a criminal case, between the government and the defendant.

Having a "GOP Lawyer" filing an amicus is clear interference and politicization IMHO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This amicus brief I read has no personal information on the corrupt man. More lies and diversion by DCUM for a sweetheart deal. The lawyers representing him should get sanctions!

The attachments are chock full of his personal financial details.

Debunked after reading, whuch i know you didnt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This amicus brief I read has no personal information on the corrupt man. More lies and diversion by DCUM for a sweetheart deal. The lawyers representing him should get sanctions!

The attachments are chock full of his personal financial details.

Debunked after reading, whuch i know you didnt

You apparently didn’t read then. Page 161 is an email from his accountant with a bunch of details about his income and taxes over multiple years. That’s just one very obvious example.

[Anonymous]

Wonder if Joe is preparing the pardon for later today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This amicus brief I read has no personal information on the corrupt man. More lies and diversion by DCUM for a sweetheart deal. The lawyers representing him should get sanctions!

The attachments are chock full of his personal financial details.

Debunked after reading, whuch i know you didnt

You apparently didn’t read then. Page 161 is an email from his accountant with a bunch of details about his income and taxes over multiple years. That’s just one very obvious example.

Which has been in the public record for years...

[Anonymous]

Nirvana is always just over the horizon, isn't it?

There is no new evidence, just a rehashing of the same tired crap they've been slinging for years, rephrasing it for the gullible. And when their latest BS gets debunked, it's because some unnamed someone did this or that to favor the Bidens.

Confirmation bias - look it up.

[Anonymous]

Yep

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yep

Rich people with security detail. OMG!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yep

This is such absurd criticism. That’s not his “posse” or some big sign of extravagance. The way the GOP is vilifying him, why would you assume he’s safe from some right winger that likes to play soldier make-believe with his guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yep

Did trumps kids get protection? Who the f follows people like this?

[Anonymous]

Didn’t Trump set up that his kids got SS protection well after he left office.

[Anonymous]

The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!

Dem here, and I don't GAF about HB. Let the justice system play out as it should in his case and every other case.

But I'm curious if you'll be just as gleeful when further indictments come in for orange Jesus. Here's the current status of the civil and criminal cases he faces:

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/20/1185762259/trump-criminal-civil-cases-lawsuits

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This week the IRS whistleblowers will be testifying and next week Devon Archer is set to testify to the House Oversight Committee about corruption he witnessed involving the Biden crime family.

Archer is supposedly going to be discussing Hunter Biden's shady business dealings in Russia and Ukraine as well as the alleged $10 million bribe the Biden family took from Ukraine.

Archer worked very closely with Hunter Biden on Burisma's board and also met with then-VP Joe Biden at the White House around the time he and Hunter joined Burisma.

Most Americans have grown tired of hearing about the nonstop "investigations" of our last two presidents and their families. Investigations shouldn't necessary to keep either man out of the White House. Trump physically mocked a physically handicapped man in 2015 while knowingly being in front of a camera and Biden is 10 years past the point at which anyone should be voted in to office as president of the most powerful country of the world. These are their disqualifications. Stop wasting time and energy on fruitless investigations. A second grader could figure this out. A C'mon Americans! We're better than this!

There are far more credible allegations supported by evidence that need to be investigated when it comes to Biden, Inc. than there ever was against the former president.
And, that incident you accused Trump of? It never happened.

But videos from 2016, 2015 and 2005 and featured on Catholics 4 Trump, show Trump doing similar - albeit shorter and less involved - impressions on several other occasions.
A video from October 2015 has Trump talking about banking regulators.

'When you see the president of the bank, I mention the word regulator-' he breaks off to perform the role of the bank president, hunching his shoulders and limply shaking his wrist and head.

Another clip, taken at the same rally Trump mocked Kovaleski, has Trump complaining about a general being asked about ISIS.

He performs similar - though more restrained - movements, waving his arms and shaking his head.

And in a clip from February this year, Trump mocks Ted Cruz for being a poor public speaker, again hunching his shoulders and shaking his arms.

The site also hosted an even earlier clip, from a 2005 Larry King interview, in which Trump pulls another limp-wristed posture while imagining how happy he would be to go on a two-week vacation.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3790226/Trump-s-impression-disabled-reporter-just-result-limited-repertoire-impressions.html

If you look at what he did when speaking of that reporter at his rally and compare it to a video of the reporter, it's hard not to come to the conclusion that Trump was mocking the reporter's handicap. For the sake of argument, let's say you're right and he wasn't specifically mocking the reporter's handicap. Still though, in that case, shouldn't someone applying for the most important job in the world have the social tact to avoid any potential appearance of mocking someone with a physical handicap? 99% of us wouldn't put up with this behavior if he were coaching a little league team or a principal at a school so why and how can it be acceptable behavior for the leader of the most powerful country in the world?

This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The plea has fallen apart... not good for Biden Inc, but great for justice!

Dem here, and I don't GAF about HB. Let the justice system play out as it should in his case and every other case.

But I'm curious if you'll be just as gleeful when further indictments come in for orange Jesus. Here's the current status of the civil and criminal cases he faces:

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/20/1185762259/trump-criminal-civil-cases-lawsuits

DP
Good Lord, woman.
He really does occupy a space in your head.

No bigger a space than that occupied in your head by Hunter Biden and "Biden Inc."