Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

Why does this “expert” assume the Sussexes don’t have competent tax advisors?

These are unusual tax issues. And the Sussexes don't have competent non-tax advisors, so I'm not sure why anyone would assume that this is different.

These issues are really not that unusual for high wealth individuals. Heck they aren’t even the first wealth member of a royal family to move to the US. And they don’t have competent advisers in other areas because they feel they are competent themselves. Considering many middle class Americans hire CPAs to do their taxes I can’t imagine either of these two have looked at a tax return for decades, if ever.

You're missing the point. It's not about who does their taxes it's about what must be REPORTED. That includes money from the BRF coffers. It will be taxed as appropriate.

Haha! Talk about a turnaround in "taxation without representation" - what irony!

What? This is why people think you guys are idiots. Meghan and Harry do not do their own taxes. Their accountant will know what the rules are and tax them accordingly. And while he will be taxed on international revenue, much of his wealth was already in hand and you don't get taxed on money you just happen to HAVE, you get taxed on money you EARN within a certain period of time. The money he HAD prior to coming here will not be taxed until he gets into a capital gains type situation.

And you obviously have a reading comprehension problem. This isn't about who does their taxes. The point is Harry MUST REPORT IT! Even if it doesn't generate income and even if it is in a foreign account. By law, U.S. citizens and residents must report ANY income from foreign trusts and foreign bank and securities accounts.

This is a member of the BRF who is going to have to DISCLOSE HIS FINANCES to the U.S. government.

Now that it is in bold do you understand it better?

What? Are you American? Have you done your taxes? You have to report INCOME yes. But I still do not understand what point you are making? Because I thought you were saying he was going to get in trouble with the government for evading taxes or messing up his taxes or something. But you seem to just be thinking its juicy that the US Gov might get to see the balance sheets of a foreign national?

But I hate to break it to you the IRS locks down interesting people's information with like, intense fortress like security. Hence DJT's taxes somehow not leaking despite every news organization in the world ready to offer big bucks. The IRS does not leak.

Perhaps though you can explain to me what YOU believe the difference is between reporting income and doing one's taxes?

Your ignorance of tax law surpasses your glib defense of the little prince.

[Anonymous]

I'm sure this has already been discussed but I hate the dedication to her book.

"For the man and the boy who make my heart go pump-pump"

BLECH!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

So I finally clicked on this article from the daily Mail. It says nothing new? And it’san outlet that has a long history of proving false info. I also googled and could find no other news sources corroborating. So this is gossip and can’t be taken as fact imo. I’m not even sure it’s putting forth any actual facts

You may be right, but after throwing them under the bus it does seem tacky. They seem to want it both ways or what benefits them most.
It was very drastic leaving the family. I wonder why they didn't buy a home in CA and go back and fourth. They still could have done their duties, but have the freedom of another home far away. Once they left the queen made it clear they wouldn't be paid, minus all the other benefits. Why didn't they test the waters first?

They address this in the Oprah interview; their move to California was unplanned.

Not really. They could have done their royal duties with the charities etc. and still bought a home in CA. Their security and pay was dropped because they totally wanted to step away. That's where they made the big mistake. Not realizing all that would stop..... speaks volumes about Harry's naivety.

This is LITERALLY what they address in the Oprah interview. Are you daft? Their initial request was to work "part-time" on their royal duties and set up camp elsewhere. They were denied this request, which then resulted in "Megxit."

We watched it play out in real time. They moved to Canada and then asked to be cafeteria royals. They launched their Sussex Royal dot com site. Then the queen said No.

They could have (and should have) asked for some settling in time. But they didn't ask for a break or a remote station. They asked to be cafeteria royals. That didn't fly.

Did you even watch the interview? What on earth are you rambling on about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

So I finally clicked on this article from the daily Mail. It says nothing new? And it’san outlet that has a long history of proving false info. I also googled and could find no other news sources corroborating. So this is gossip and can’t be taken as fact imo. I’m not even sure it’s putting forth any actual facts

You may be right, but after throwing them under the bus it does seem tacky. They seem to want it both ways or what benefits them most.
It was very drastic leaving the family. I wonder why they didn't buy a home in CA and go back and fourth. They still could have done their duties, but have the freedom of another home far away. Once they left the queen made it clear they wouldn't be paid, minus all the other benefits. Why didn't they test the waters first?

They address this in the Oprah interview; their move to California was unplanned.

Not really. They could have done their royal duties with the charities etc. and still bought a home in CA. Their security and pay was dropped because they totally wanted to step away. That's where they made the big mistake. Not realizing all that would stop..... speaks volumes about Harry's naivety.

This is LITERALLY what they address in the Oprah interview. Are you daft? Their initial request was to work "part-time" on their royal duties and set up camp elsewhere. They were denied this request, which then resulted in "Megxit."

We watched it play out in real time. They moved to Canada and then asked to be cafeteria royals. They launched their Sussex Royal dot com site. Then the queen said No.

They could have (and should have) asked for some settling in time. But they didn't ask for a break or a remote station. They asked to be cafeteria royals. That didn't fly.

Did you even watch the interview? What on earth are you rambling on about?

I watched part but not all of the interview. Whatever they want to say in 2021, we all saw what happened last year. They asked for what they wanted, didn't get it, and moved to LA. Poor victims!

Did you forget about their tacky trademarked website?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

So I finally clicked on this article from the daily Mail. It says nothing new? And it’san outlet that has a long history of proving false info. I also googled and could find no other news sources corroborating. So this is gossip and can’t be taken as fact imo. I’m not even sure it’s putting forth any actual facts

You may be right, but after throwing them under the bus it does seem tacky. They seem to want it both ways or what benefits them most.
It was very drastic leaving the family. I wonder why they didn't buy a home in CA and go back and fourth. They still could have done their duties, but have the freedom of another home far away. Once they left the queen made it clear they wouldn't be paid, minus all the other benefits. Why didn't they test the waters first?

They address this in the Oprah interview; their move to California was unplanned.

Not really. They could have done their royal duties with the charities etc. and still bought a home in CA. Their security and pay was dropped because they totally wanted to step away. That's where they made the big mistake. Not realizing all that would stop..... speaks volumes about Harry's naivety.

This is LITERALLY what they address in the Oprah interview. Are you daft? Their initial request was to work "part-time" on their royal duties and set up camp elsewhere. They were denied this request, which then resulted in "Megxit."

We watched it play out in real time. They moved to Canada and then asked to be cafeteria royals. They launched their Sussex Royal dot com site. Then the queen said No.

They could have (and should have) asked for some settling in time. But they didn't ask for a break or a remote station. They asked to be cafeteria royals. That didn't fly.

Did you even watch the interview? What on earth are you rambling on about?

I watched part but not all of the interview. Whatever they want to say in 2021, we all saw what happened last year. They asked for what they wanted, didn't get it, and moved to LA. Poor victims!

Did you forget about their tacky trademarked website?

Er, you sound a bit dim. Maybe you should read up first instead of blindly just following Daily Mail headlines and select Twitter rants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

Why does this “expert” assume the Sussexes don’t have competent tax advisors?

These are unusual tax issues. And the Sussexes don't have competent non-tax advisors, so I'm not sure why anyone would assume that this is different.

These issues are really not that unusual for high wealth individuals. Heck they aren’t even the first wealth member of a royal family to move to the US. And they don’t have competent advisers in other areas because they feel they are competent themselves. Considering many middle class Americans hire CPAs to do their taxes I can’t imagine either of these two have looked at a tax return for decades, if ever.

You're missing the point. It's not about who does their taxes it's about what must be REPORTED. That includes money from the BRF coffers. It will be taxed as appropriate.

Haha! Talk about a turnaround in "taxation without representation" - what irony!

What? This is why people think you guys are idiots. Meghan and Harry do not do their own taxes. Their accountant will know what the rules are and tax them accordingly. And while he will be taxed on international revenue, much of his wealth was already in hand and you don't get taxed on money you just happen to HAVE, you get taxed on money you EARN within a certain period of time. The money he HAD prior to coming here will not be taxed until he gets into a capital gains type situation.

And you obviously have a reading comprehension problem. This isn't about who does their taxes. The point is Harry MUST REPORT IT! Even if it doesn't generate income and even if it is in a foreign account. By law, U.S. citizens and residents must report ANY income from foreign trusts and foreign bank and securities accounts.

This is a member of the BRF who is going to have to DISCLOSE HIS FINANCES to the U.S. government.

Now that it is in bold do you understand it better?

What? Are you American? Have you done your taxes? You have to report INCOME yes. But I still do not understand what point you are making? Because I thought you were saying he was going to get in trouble with the government for evading taxes or messing up his taxes or something. But you seem to just be thinking its juicy that the US Gov might get to see the balance sheets of a foreign national?

But I hate to break it to you the IRS locks down interesting people's information with like, intense fortress like security. Hence DJT's taxes somehow not leaking despite every news organization in the world ready to offer big bucks. The IRS does not leak.

Perhaps though you can explain to me what YOU believe the difference is between reporting income and doing one's taxes?

Your ignorance of tax law surpasses your glib defense of the little prince.

DP. I’m a tax attorney and you don’t understand what you are talking about. Clearly someone like him would have an actual tax attorney retained. He’s not reinventing the wheel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

So I finally clicked on this article from the daily Mail. It says nothing new? And it’san outlet that has a long history of proving false info. I also googled and could find no other news sources corroborating. So this is gossip and can’t be taken as fact imo. I’m not even sure it’s putting forth any actual facts

You may be right, but after throwing them under the bus it does seem tacky. They seem to want it both ways or what benefits them most.
It was very drastic leaving the family. I wonder why they didn't buy a home in CA and go back and fourth. They still could have done their duties, but have the freedom of another home far away. Once they left the queen made it clear they wouldn't be paid, minus all the other benefits. Why didn't they test the waters first?

They address this in the Oprah interview; their move to California was unplanned.

Not really. They could have done their royal duties with the charities etc. and still bought a home in CA. Their security and pay was dropped because they totally wanted to step away. That's where they made the big mistake. Not realizing all that would stop..... speaks volumes about Harry's naivety.

This is LITERALLY what they address in the Oprah interview. Are you daft? Their initial request was to work "part-time" on their royal duties and set up camp elsewhere. They were denied this request, which then resulted in "Megxit."

We watched it play out in real time. They moved to Canada and then asked to be cafeteria royals. They launched their Sussex Royal dot com site. Then the queen said No.

They could have (and should have) asked for some settling in time. But they didn't ask for a break or a remote station. They asked to be cafeteria royals. That didn't fly.

Did you even watch the interview? What on earth are you rambling on about?

I watched part but not all of the interview. Whatever they want to say in 2021, we all saw what happened last year. They asked for what they wanted, didn't get it, and moved to LA. Poor victims!

Did you forget about their tacky trademarked website?

Er, you sound a bit dim. Maybe you should read up first instead of blindly just following Daily Mail headlines and select Twitter rants.

Okay. You don't have to discuss. Just insult. If that's what you want to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

Why does this “expert” assume the Sussexes don’t have competent tax advisors?

These are unusual tax issues. And the Sussexes don't have competent non-tax advisors, so I'm not sure why anyone would assume that this is different.

These issues are really not that unusual for high wealth individuals. Heck they aren’t even the first wealth member of a royal family to move to the US. And they don’t have competent advisers in other areas because they feel they are competent themselves. Considering many middle class Americans hire CPAs to do their taxes I can’t imagine either of these two have looked at a tax return for decades, if ever.

You're missing the point. It's not about who does their taxes it's about what must be REPORTED. That includes money from the BRF coffers. It will be taxed as appropriate.

Haha! Talk about a turnaround in "taxation without representation" - what irony!

What? This is why people think you guys are idiots. Meghan and Harry do not do their own taxes. Their accountant will know what the rules are and tax them accordingly. And while he will be taxed on international revenue, much of his wealth was already in hand and you don't get taxed on money you just happen to HAVE, you get taxed on money you EARN within a certain period of time. The money he HAD prior to coming here will not be taxed until he gets into a capital gains type situation.

And you obviously have a reading comprehension problem. This isn't about who does their taxes. The point is Harry MUST REPORT IT! Even if it doesn't generate income and even if it is in a foreign account. By law, U.S. citizens and residents must report ANY income from foreign trusts and foreign bank and securities accounts.

This is a member of the BRF who is going to have to DISCLOSE HIS FINANCES to the U.S. government.

Now that it is in bold do you understand it better?

What? Are you American? Have you done your taxes? You have to report INCOME yes. But I still do not understand what point you are making? Because I thought you were saying he was going to get in trouble with the government for evading taxes or messing up his taxes or something. But you seem to just be thinking its juicy that the US Gov might get to see the balance sheets of a foreign national?

But I hate to break it to you the IRS locks down interesting people's information with like, intense fortress like security. Hence DJT's taxes somehow not leaking despite every news organization in the world ready to offer big bucks. The IRS does not leak.

Perhaps though you can explain to me what YOU believe the difference is between reporting income and doing one's taxes?

Your ignorance of tax law surpasses your glib defense of the little prince.

DP. I’m a tax attorney and you don’t understand what you are talking about. Clearly someone like him would have an actual tax attorney retained. He’s not reinventing the wheel.

Exactly. I’m not even sure what that poster is ranting about. Of course Harry will have folks that will report of his income appropriately. What difference does it make that he has to report income to the U.S. government?

[Anonymous]

Between the bizarro tax poster and the bizarro first amendment poster I feel like there are some non American trolls trying to instigate but they have literally no idea what they are talking about so are coming across as incredibly dumb

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Queen is standing by the BBC’s story that she wasn’t consulted on the name “Lilibet,” despite H&M’s threats to sue the BBC. Could get interesting.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-harry-and-meghan-markles-war-with-the-royals-hits-fever-pitch-over-lilibet

It continues to reinforce these 2 are a hot mess together. Did anyone see the interview with Meghan's dad? Very sad, that man put her through college and seemed like a good dad. Still whatever her gripes it doesn't amount to being cut off. Actually her dad made a lot of good points.

I'm not a Meghan hater but the recent 60 minutes interview with her father is really sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Queen is standing by the BBC’s story that she wasn’t consulted on the name “Lilibet,” despite H&M’s threats to sue the BBC. Could get interesting.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-harry-and-meghan-markles-war-with-the-royals-hits-fever-pitch-over-lilibet

It continues to reinforce these 2 are a hot mess together. Did anyone see the interview with Meghan's dad? Very sad, that man put her through college and seemed like a good dad. Still whatever her gripes it doesn't amount to being cut off. Actually her dad made a lot of good points.

I'm not a Meghan hater but the recent 60 minutes interview with her father is really sad.

A good father doesn’t sell his daughter out to the press no matter the state of their relationship

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Queen is standing by the BBC’s story that she wasn’t consulted on the name “Lilibet,” despite H&M’s threats to sue the BBC. Could get interesting.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-harry-and-meghan-markles-war-with-the-royals-hits-fever-pitch-over-lilibet

It continues to reinforce these 2 are a hot mess together. Did anyone see the interview with Meghan's dad? Very sad, that man put her through college and seemed like a good dad. Still whatever her gripes it doesn't amount to being cut off. Actually her dad made a lot of good points.

I'm not a Meghan hater but the recent 60 minutes interview with her father is really sad.

A good father doesn’t sell his daughter out to the press no matter the state of their relationship

This daughter sold out the entire royal family. I agree that both are horrible. Like father, like daughter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Queen is standing by the BBC’s story that she wasn’t consulted on the name “Lilibet,” despite H&M’s threats to sue the BBC. Could get interesting.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-harry-and-meghan-markles-war-with-the-royals-hits-fever-pitch-over-lilibet

It continues to reinforce these 2 are a hot mess together. Did anyone see the interview with Meghan's dad? Very sad, that man put her through college and seemed like a good dad. Still whatever her gripes it doesn't amount to being cut off. Actually her dad made a lot of good points.

I'm not a Meghan hater but the recent 60 minutes interview with her father is really sad.

A good father doesn’t sell his daughter out to the press no matter the state of their relationship

That ship sailed years ago. He started it, yes. After the Oprah interview, though, there's no reason for anyone in her family to stay away from the press anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Between the bizarro tax poster and the bizarro first amendment poster I feel like there are some non American trolls trying to instigate but they have literally no idea what they are talking about so are coming across as incredibly dumb

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bizarro tax poster and the bizarro first amendment poster I feel like there are some non American trolls trying to instigate but they have literally no idea what they are talking about so are coming across as incredibly dumb

+1

+1 totally agree

I think the tip off for the first amendment poster was the combination of being wildly wrong about the first amendment while simultaneously claiming to have gone to Harvard law school. It makes sense a troll would say Harvard, because it's the most famous one.