Gaza War, Part 3

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.


Yes, that's exactly what I said.

Care to share bin Laden's letter next?

Or perhaps some Chinese government statements on the glorious "re-education" of the Uighurs?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.


Yes, that's exactly what I said.

Care to share bin Laden's letter next?

Or perhaps some Chinese government statements on the glorious "re-education" of the Uighurs?


So...you think this comments ought not be reported?

Or you simply dislike the fact they were reported by the people you dislike?

Have they lied?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.


Yes, that's exactly what I said.

Care to share bin Laden's letter next?

Or perhaps some Chinese government statements on the glorious "re-education" of the Uighurs?


So...you think this comments ought not be reported?

Or you simply dislike the fact they were reported by the people you dislike?

Have they lied?



I don't think that people should spread terrorist propaganda. (Of course they've lied).

There's a term for people like that: terrorist sympathizers.

I think that people SHOULD discuss news from reputable sources, including the abominable comments by some members of the Israeli government.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


My. Fancy that

I'm old enough to know the US's global standing is negatively affected no matter what we do. Many countries including the dogmatic Arab countries think the US is nutters for endorsing and promoting LGBTA rights, for example.


Coming to the stage, y’all, it’s the ever-present nutters shrew! Woo!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


My. Fancy that

I'm old enough to know the US's global standing is negatively affected no matter what we do. Many countries including the dogmatic Arab countries think the US is nutters for endorsing and promoting LGBTA rights, for example.


Coming to the stage, y’all, it’s the ever-present nutters shrew! Woo!


Would you believe that there are two of us?

Glorious word. Evocative, precise, and oh-so-apt.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.


Yes, that's exactly what I said.

Care to share bin Laden's letter next?

Or perhaps some Chinese government statements on the glorious "re-education" of the Uighurs?


So...you think this comments ought not be reported?

Or you simply dislike the fact they were reported by the people you dislike?

Have they lied?



I don't think that people should spread terrorist propaganda. (Of course they've lied).

There's a term for people like that: terrorist sympathizers.

I think that people SHOULD discuss news from reputable sources, including the abominable comments by some members of the Israeli government.


Point out their lies in the coverage of the minister's speech, thanks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


My. Fancy that

I'm old enough to know the US's global standing is negatively affected no matter what we do. Many countries including the dogmatic Arab countries think the US is nutters for endorsing and promoting LGBTA rights, for example.


I guess you are not up on the current politics of Israel if you think LGBTA rights are promoted there. But the real isssue is why does the US support Israel? It is totally against this country’s national interest.


Quite the opposite.

Palestinians bring nothing to the table in terms of US interests.

Arab states DGAF one way or another.


100+ countries (opposed only by the apartheid state of Israel, its welfare daddy America, and America’s meager community of reliant micro nations) seem to GAF quite a bit. Have you missed all the U.N. Resolutions that the U.S. has been blocking?

Incidentally, the Palestinians don’t NEED to bring anything to the table to make supporting apartheid Israel a horrible strategic move for the U.S.

Despite the propaganda campaign that has failed to convince us that supporting Israel protects our own “strategic interests” (fact check: it doesn’t), Israel is dead weight for America.

The only “thing” that apartheid Israel brings to the table is plentiful opportunity for racists / Zionist lobbyists and supporters to prop-up a group of white immigrants who are eager to dehumanize non-white indigenous people. The political favor curried back home for the American politician supporting Israel is an added bonus.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.


Yes, that's exactly what I said.

Care to share bin Laden's letter next?

Or perhaps some Chinese government statements on the glorious "re-education" of the Uighurs?


So...you think this comments ought not be reported?

Or you simply dislike the fact they were reported by the people you dislike?

Have they lied?



I don't think that people should spread terrorist propaganda. (Of course they've lied).

There's a term for people like that: terrorist sympathizers.

I think that people SHOULD discuss news from reputable sources, including the abominable comments by some members of the Israeli government.


Point out their lies in the coverage of the minister's speech, thanks.


Zero percent chance I'm visiting QNN website.

Why? Because I don't support terrorists.

But if you'd like to review their (abysmal) credibility rating, you can do so at the link below. Bottom line: they lie.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/quds-news-network-bias-and-credibility/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


My. Fancy that

I'm old enough to know the US's global standing is negatively affected no matter what we do. Many countries including the dogmatic Arab countries think the US is nutters for endorsing and promoting LGBTA rights, for example.


I guess you are not up on the current politics of Israel if you think LGBTA rights are promoted there. But the real isssue is why does the US support Israel? It is totally against this country’s national interest.


Quite the opposite.

Palestinians bring nothing to the table in terms of US interests.

Arab states DGAF one way or another.


100+ countries (opposed only by the apartheid state of Israel, its welfare daddy America, and America’s meager community of reliant micro nations) seem to GAF quite a bit. Have you missed all the U.N. Resolutions that the U.S. has been blocking?

Incidentally, the Palestinians don’t NEED to bring anything to the table to make supporting apartheid Israel a horrible strategic move for the U.S.

Despite the propaganda campaign that has failed to convince us that supporting Israel protects our own “strategic interests” (fact check: it doesn’t), Israel is dead weight for America.

The only “thing” that apartheid Israel brings to the table is plentiful opportunity for racists / Zionist lobbyists and supporters to prop-up a group of white immigrants who are eager to dehumanize non-white indigenous people. The political favor curried back home for the American politician supporting Israel is an added bonus.


UN resolutions???

C'mon. Get serious.

Call me when security partnerships or trade deals are threatened.

You're mistaking performative behavior for reality. It's the geopolitical equivalent of believing that social media reflects real life.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:LOL

“I said voluntary emigration, and in Judaism, there is an idea known as ‘Compelling him until he says, I want,’” Kahri said shortly before the clip of the interview shared on X begins, referring to a Jewish legal concept that typically applies to divorce or charitable giving.

When the interviewer, Moran Azulay, asked how the Israeli government would accomplish that, Karhi’s reply was blunt.

“The war does what it does,” he said.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-gaza-hamas-voluntary-emigration_n_659f0ad9e4b0e696b9109c39

This is where you stop pretending it didn't happen. Even if Al-Quds network carried it.


Not pretending anything. The Israeli far right is despicable.

As is QNN.


Right....because the government minister who wants to torture people until they want to leave, and a TV network that reports his comments are, like, totally comparable.


Yes, that's exactly what I said.

Care to share bin Laden's letter next?

Or perhaps some Chinese government statements on the glorious "re-education" of the Uighurs?


So...you think this comments ought not be reported?

Or you simply dislike the fact they were reported by the people you dislike?

Have they lied?



I don't think that people should spread terrorist propaganda. (Of course they've lied).

There's a term for people like that: terrorist sympathizers.

I think that people SHOULD discuss news from reputable sources, including the abominable comments by some members of the Israeli government.


Point out their lies in the coverage of the minister's speech, thanks.


Zero percent chance I'm visiting QNN website.

Why? Because I don't support terrorists.

But if you'd like to review their (abysmal) credibility rating, you can do so at the link below. Bottom line: they lie.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/quds-news-network-bias-and-credibility/


Of course you support terrorists! Israel was built on the back of a fully documented, accredited, and very active terrorist movement - Zionism!

Get real - Israel and its founders have been the author of more terrorism over the past 100 years than any nation or group. You can’t run from those facts, though I’m certain you will try to distort the facts, or engage in ad hominem attacks, or launch into some other kind of propaganda screed to try to convince others (yourself, too?) that Israel has actually been nothing worse than a ray of perfect sunshine surrounded by sub-human barbarians committed to opposing their actions in the region for completely unknown reasons.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


My. Fancy that

I'm old enough to know the US's global standing is negatively affected no matter what we do. Many countries including the dogmatic Arab countries think the US is nutters for endorsing and promoting LGBTA rights, for example.


So does Russia and the Chinese.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


I mean, this is just kinda silly.

First, "global standing" means what to you exactly?

Second, how exactly is our security or prosperity affected by an alleged decline in global standing?

Third, even if "global standing" has some importance, what gives you the idea that supporting Israel will actually negatively affect it? (It won't.)


Global standing is everything when you want influence . The Middle East used to be the US’s sphere of influence. Not anymore. China brokered a historic peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran this year without any interference or knowledge by the U.S. -that’s huge . The US, not one to be one-upped, pushed Saudi Arabia to recognize Israel as well. Then, Hamas said “oh no, they don’t” and 10/7 happened.

China, Russia, and the ME have come together and realized they share more values . I hate to say it but nobody in the world is taking the US seriously with the rainbow lit White House and trans generals. It’s stuff like that has made us lose our influence worldwide particularly in the East (and I consider Russia the East)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A 4 year old Palestinian girl in the West Bank was shot and killed in the backseat of a car and called a “young lady” by Israeli media .

Amazing how they consider Palestinian kids adults.

Ruqaya Ahmad Odeh Jahalin, four, was shot in the back by Israeli forces around 5:30 p.m. on January 7 while sitting in the backseat of a shared taxi van near an Israeli military checkpoint near the Palestinian village of Beit Iksa, northwest of Jerusalem in the central occupied West Bank, according to documentation collected by Defense for Children International - Palestine. After Ruqaya and her mother drove through the checkpoint, a car driving about 40 meters (131 feet) behind them did not stop for inspection by Israeli forces. Israeli forces opened fire on both vehicles, striking Ruqaya in the back. An Israeli military ambulance transported Ruqaya and her mother to the checkpoint, where Ruqaya’s father met them. Israeli forces interrogated Ruqaya’s father before allowing him to leave without releasing Ruqaya’s body.


Why are Palestinians trying to crash military checkpoints? And aren't people aware that bullets are messy things, they can bounce, they can penetrate through one object and continue travel to another, and so on. Attempting to ram your way through a military checkpoint puts everyone at risk. It would be sheer insanity to assume nobody would get hurt from such an act.


The four year old? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint. The driver of her vehicle? Didn’t crash a military checkpoint.

The IDF killed a child for the crime of being Palestinian. And you defended it. Two fascinating levels of dehumanization on display.


A lunatic next to them did tried to crash the military checkpoint, and that person is who put the child in that risk. And again, you seem completely oblivious to realities as they unfold on the ground. You seem incredibly naive about the world.


Do you realize you make no sense. The person whose finger is in the trigger is the one who kills.


Technically, of course.

Morally and legally? It depends. Felony murder doctrine, for example.


Felony murder doctrine in this case would implicate the IDF. They were already engaged in an occupation deemed illegal https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiopt/2022-10-19/Report-COI-OPT-14Sept2022-EN.pdf when they shot a child who had, incidentally, not committed any crime.

I’m sure the IDF will “investigate”


The international community must ostracize Israel and, if it continues to support Israel, the United States.

Israel is doing incalculable damage to America’s global standing.


America’s global standing is not affected in any material way by its support for Israel.

Get serious.


Our global standing is actually negatively affected by our unbiased support for Israel.


My. Fancy that

I'm old enough to know the US's global standing is negatively affected no matter what we do. Many countries including the dogmatic Arab countries think the US is nutters for endorsing and promoting LGBTA rights, for example.


Coming to the stage, y’all, it’s the ever-present nutters shrew! Woo!


Would you believe that there are two of us?

Glorious word. Evocative, precise, and oh-so-apt.


Doubt the universe is ready for two of you, but DID is an actual disorder, so …

As to your point, the argument that the U.S. will be criticized or disliked by others no matter what we do is utter bullshit that’s easy to see through. That argument has been misused for decades now by Zionists to take attention away from the actual consequences of our support of Israel and the blank check we provide that enables Israel to terrorize and bully its neighbors.

After the 9/11 attacks occurred, the perpetrators told us in very, very, very explicit terms that the attacks were planned and executed in direct response to our support of Israel and its sustained, horrific mistreatment of indigenous Palestinians in the Middle East. The message was clear: we were attacked because of the devastating damage to regional stability and human rights that the U.S. has enabled Israel to author without consequence.

In response, the Zionist propaganda campaign sprung to life and distorted what was actually said into “They hate our Western values and way of life!” … and tens of millions of Americans still eat at that poisoned trough today.

Save that nonsense that our actions have no consequence for someone else.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: