The only way to escape this is to go private where those kids aren’t, or get your kid in AAP, honors or higher level classes where those kids won’t be later on. |
Yes....SPED IEPs/laws are silencing the majority. Parents fight for Gen ed classrooms (LRE) no matter how unrealistic or disruptive it is to the others. Everyone says their hands are tied and we keep losing solid educators. LRE does not mean general education but no one s standing up for the all the other kids in the room. And before we go all ballistic about ADHD or LD that is not who I am talking about. I am talking about kids hurting other students, teachers-destroying rooms-that should not be happening in Gen ED every day. But it is. |
+1 |
Sadly it doesn't even pay that much, it's around $19. |
DP. It’s a myth that there aren’t disruptive kids in AAP. Of course there are. |
DP there are different levels of disruptions. |
I subbed in an AAP classroom in a highly sough-after elementary school and witnessed some of the worst behavior I've ever dealt with as a sub. 6th grader threw himself on the ground and had a full-fledged tantrum, ripped his notebook and binders apart, all because I asked him to do his work. Admin sent him to another teacher because he "needed a break" and that teacher was his break buddy or something. Several of the other gifted angels ignored instructions, went on their phones, and shrugged and gave me dirty look when I asked them to work. AAP is no guarantee of anything. |
| Nova publics circling the drain. All the best privates are in MOCO and DC. |
If you think private school is the way to escape terrible behaviors, I have a bridge to sell you. I taught in public for several decades. I'm now in a super pricey private. The behaviors we see are atrocious and in some cases, a true safety problem. It is only minimally better than public, where it might only take 2-3 years to "get rid" of a kid instead of 5-6 or a bringing a weapon in public. |
Wow well homeschool wins I guess
|
What is most tragic about this is that the Gen Ed environment is clearly NOT least restrictive for explosive students like this. There is just TOO MUCH that can set them off at any given memory in the day. I transferred from a school with a great CSS to a school where the principal believed that LRE always means Gen Ed, and I saw a kid suffer so much (and his class suffer along with) who could have thrived in a CSS classroom with 4-5 peers and maybe mainstreaming for one or two subjects a day. Instead, every single day, they'll classroom had to be evacuated, sometimes multiple times a day. But they child's parent vehemently opposed a CSS placement and the principal seemed to think it was some kind of failure to push that as truly the least restrictive environment for that child. With more feedback, more opportunities to catch the child doing something right, less peer conflict, less distraction, less sensory overload from a big class and lots of bodies, this child would have been so much more free to engage and learn and experience success. |
Just wondering if the parent had knowledge about the classroom evacuations? Are you allowed to video them and show the parents? I would think that if the parent knew what the kid was doing then they would have felt differently. Also wondering if the parents complained about this kid? |
That is not necessarily true. If the school does not get an EMRT from central office, the funding is coming from local staffing shifts and trades, and the principal can hire whoever she wants for a "resource teacher" position. In my school's case, the teacher was not a trained EMRT. She even had the lowest math SOL scores in the school every year. Just someone to whom the principal wanted to gift a sweet position. While the rest of us have classes nearing 30. Ironically, though she isn't a great math teacher, she was an excellent disciplinarian and the whole grade level really suffers now that she is not in a classroom position. I don't begrudge anyone a less stressful job. But I don't think principals whouod be allowed to do this when classes are so big. |
Countless parents complained about the child. They hit the brick wall of admin saying they can't discuss other children (unless the child directly harmed theirs, and even then nothing happened). The parent of the child was very aware of daily meltdowns and classroom evacuations. All was blamed on staff for antagonizing child or not following de-escalation methods. (The child would just ignore all possible paths to de-escalate...or all of the de-escalation options discussed in countless meetings with behavior intervention teachers would only escalate the child further.) The parent was not open to any feedback about how this placement was hurting the child. The parent's perspective was all about how other kids and staffers were hurting her completely innocent child and if everyone would only follow the plan, her child would be an angel. |
Does FCPS Administration or Gatehouse ever do anonymous surveys for the teachers to find out what the problems are? I have heard that teachers have an exit interview when they leave but most will not be honest about the real reason as to not burn bridges. If FCPS does not find out the root of the problems and then implement a solution, they will keep losing teachers and the quality will get even worse and the losers will be the kids unfortunately. |