Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! Reddit people are dishing. This is what they have said, and I don’t know if this is accurate.

1. Pippa is not really on vacation at a beach. The Daily Mail admitted those are old photos.

2. The Wales kids have allegedly been pulled from school so that would be why no photos.

3. A man who was Pippa’s confidante leaked domestic violence rumors and he is now dead.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1b2rtfo/what_are_your_thoughts_on_kate_middleton_missing/

Reddit: so believable!

The person posting that reddit stuff here is absolutely insane. Holy moly.

Who said it was true? You guys are taking this too seriously.

[Anonymous]

Why is it still up on the BBC, with no disclaimer or update of any sort? Even if they didn’t want to pull it outright, there should be an editors note that other news agencies have pulled it for concerns, and that BBC has reached out to the palace for clarification and/or a new photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

She’s entitled to privacy when she’s ill. It was obviously serious. God you people are ghouls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some are speculating that royal divorce proceedings are underway and it is a long negotiation and that’s why her parents have not been seen either. They are holed up with her. And if she can last, until after the king dies, it may be too hard for him to divorce her. As she will be Queen.

There was no surgery according to this theory (possible hospitalization due to eating disorder or mental instability).

She may not have seen her children since then either. If in fact, this is what William wants and he is trying to make a new life with Rose.

That’s the big theory circulating in British aristocratic circles.

British press definitely knows more than they are saying. Especially that negative hit job that they were told to run on her before it was switched a day later to be a hit job on Harry.

Why Rose? I actually wouldn't be surprised if a divorce or separation was happening in the background. It would explain a lot of the secrecy and bad PR attempts but I don't think it's for Rose.

Why would you divorce your wife and create this giant royal ruckus if there was not another woman?

💯

Read British press. There’s a divorce brewing

https://medium.com/@sueteh999/what-was-behind-the-cold-freezing-adelaide-cottage-story-a3f252264852

In what circumstance would support for Kate dwindle? Not for a divorce, not for a seriously health issue, not for a mistress. There is basically no scenario that Kate doesn't come out on top.

If William divorce Kate tomorrow the British public would not care! She would just be another commoner to them.

i

She has so much leverage though. The stories that she has. She would be entitled to a giant settlement.

That’s what her parents would be negotiating. This line of thought is even remotely possible.

In which world do you think the BRF would allow Kate to tell stories? She would just have a paparazzi chasing incident.

How many of you psychopaths think Diana died because the Queen made a phone call, as opposed to her being driven by a drunk and not wearing her seatbelt?

I think it’s both.

Diana was not given adequate security just like Harry is not given adequate security. Whether you like Harry and Diana or not, taking away security is a way to passively cause harm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some are speculating that royal divorce proceedings are underway and it is a long negotiation and that’s why her parents have not been seen either. They are holed up with her. And if she can last, until after the king dies, it may be too hard for him to divorce her. As she will be Queen.

There was no surgery according to this theory (possible hospitalization due to eating disorder or mental instability).

She may not have seen her children since then either. If in fact, this is what William wants and he is trying to make a new life with Rose.

That’s the big theory circulating in British aristocratic circles.

British press definitely knows more than they are saying. Especially that negative hit job that they were told to run on her before it was switched a day later to be a hit job on Harry.

Why Rose? I actually wouldn't be surprised if a divorce or separation was happening in the background. It would explain a lot of the secrecy and bad PR attempts but I don't think it's for Rose.

Why would you divorce your wife and create this giant royal ruckus if there was not another woman?

💯

Read British press. There’s a divorce brewing

https://medium.com/@sueteh999/what-was-behind-the-cold-freezing-adelaide-cottage-story-a3f252264852

In what circumstance would support for Kate dwindle? Not for a divorce, not for a seriously health issue, not for a mistress. There is basically no scenario that Kate doesn't come out on top.

If William divorce Kate tomorrow the British public would not care! She would just be another commoner to them.

i

She has so much leverage though. The stories that she has. She would be entitled to a giant settlement.

That’s what her parents would be negotiating. This line of thought is even remotely possible.

In which world do you think the BRF would allow Kate to tell stories? She would just have a paparazzi chasing incident.

How many of you psychopaths think Diana died because the Queen made a phone call, as opposed to her being driven by a drunk and not wearing her seatbelt?

Some of us don't draw history lessons from made-for-T.V. shows. We were adults when Diana was killed. We remember. The limousine driver's friends and family EMPHATICALLY stated he was NOT a drinker, and never drank. Why would his friends and family say he didn't drink if he did drink? The only DUI pronouncements were made by the authorities. Get it? He was framed. Use your brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

She’s entitled to privacy when she’s ill. It was obviously serious. God you people are ghouls.

+1. Safe bet it’s the Markle crazies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol how is this situation getting worst. There's no way their entire team isn't getting fired after this.

I love how this is blowing up

Can people more knowledgeable than me about these things please recommend some PR firms for KP! We have talked about their amateur mistakes in the past…this is now ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

She’s entitled to privacy when she’s ill. It was obviously serious. God you people are ghouls.

No what's ghoulish is people like this continuing to manipulate the public through the media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am still perplexed at why people think William and Kate are having 'marriage issues' that would necessitate them being separated, aside from idle gossip with zero proof.

I have seen no evidence of the sort, at all, anywhere. If they are on the verge of divorce after the last few years, then they should be at the Oscars tonight getting an award.

It’s funny you think you see and know all about their relationship from some photos. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

She’s entitled to privacy when she’s ill. It was obviously serious. God you people are ghouls.

No one forced William to issue the photo. They have a history of using photos from one photo shoot for multiple holidays.

The more they do stuff like this, the more it looks like something is seriously wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some are speculating that royal divorce proceedings are underway and it is a long negotiation and that’s why her parents have not been seen either. They are holed up with her. And if she can last, until after the king dies, it may be too hard for him to divorce her. As she will be Queen.

There was no surgery according to this theory (possible hospitalization due to eating disorder or mental instability).

She may not have seen her children since then either. If in fact, this is what William wants and he is trying to make a new life with Rose.

That’s the big theory circulating in British aristocratic circles.

British press definitely knows more than they are saying. Especially that negative hit job that they were told to run on her before it was switched a day later to be a hit job on Harry.

Why Rose? I actually wouldn't be surprised if a divorce or separation was happening in the background. It would explain a lot of the secrecy and bad PR attempts but I don't think it's for Rose.

Why would you divorce your wife and create this giant royal ruckus if there was not another woman?

💯

Read British press. There’s a divorce brewing

https://medium.com/@sueteh999/what-was-behind-the-cold-freezing-adelaide-cottage-story-a3f252264852

In what circumstance would support for Kate dwindle? Not for a divorce, not for a seriously health issue, not for a mistress. There is basically no scenario that Kate doesn't come out on top.

If William divorce Kate tomorrow the British public would not care! She would just be another commoner to them.

i

She has so much leverage though. The stories that she has. She would be entitled to a giant settlement.

That’s what her parents would be negotiating. This line of thought is even remotely possible.

In which world do you think the BRF would allow Kate to tell stories? She would just have a paparazzi chasing incident.

How many of you psychopaths think Diana died because the Queen made a phone call, as opposed to her being driven by a drunk and not wearing her seatbelt?

Some of us don't draw history lessons from made-for-T.V. shows. We were adults when Diana was killed. We remember. The limousine driver's friends and family EMPHATICALLY stated he was NOT a drinker, and never drank. Why would his friends and family say he didn't drink if he did drink? The only DUI pronouncements were made by the authorities. Get it? He was framed. Use your brain.

Who told her not to wear a seat belt? We also remember the one survivor was wearing one. Did you forget that part?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

She’s entitled to privacy when she’s ill. It was obviously serious. God you people are ghouls.

+1. Safe bet it’s the Markle crazies.

This person who keeps calling people
“Crazies” is probably the craziest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

and shame on them for even taking this route. The photoshop job is bad but I bet their demands were unreasonable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it still up on the BBC, with no disclaimer or update of any sort? Even if they didn’t want to pull it outright, there should be an editors note that other news agencies have pulled it for concerns, and that BBC has reached out to the palace for clarification and/or a new photo.

Exactly this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When your proof of life photo is too fake for the wire services

Kate is basically every mom who has tried to take a sick day, only to have her bumbling spouse muck it up.
She's probably getting out of her pajamas right now, uttering under her breath, "oh for pete's sake, do I have to do everything myself?!"

Or, she could have donned her best pajamas, let someone put on a little makeup and done her hair a little before a planned shower or bath, gotten in bed and had her children surround her for a candidly posed picture. Done.

I hate that I sort of agree. It’s not as though she had the surgery yesterday. It’s been nearly two months. She knew her role long before she strolled down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. What they/she chose to do instead is nothing short of a disaster.

She’s entitled to privacy when she’s ill. It was obviously serious. God you people are ghouls.

+1. Safe bet it’s the Markle crazies.

This person who keeps calling people
“Crazies” is probably the craziest.

This. It has nothing to do Harry or Meghan, especially since they also edit their pictures. The manipulation on this list photo with Kate crossed the line it needed to be call out. That's not being crazy.