Kate Middleton in Hospital - Recovering from Surgery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This procedure couldn’t have been planned for long because William only today canceled his appointments for the next few weeks. I think it’s rather something serious and unexpected. One can plan a surgery a day before.

It also rules out cosmetic surgery, unless they planned some giant elaborate ruse.

And with the 8:30pm convoy to the hospital—that speaks more emergency

The X poster corrected it to say 6.30pm was time of footage. If it was HRH Catherine then it's a possibility she's been in hospital since Dec 28th, maybe a different hospital as an 'acute' case for around 3 weeks, and then admitted for a 'planned' surgery at TLC yesterday.

All just speculation and I'm starting to feel a bit guilty as I'm sure it's last thing she wants.

I think she does a lot for our RF and I wish her a smooth and swift recovery.

Thanks. Feel the same way. Guilty for wanting to know/pry as I am very private and not even in the public eye like her. Especially with young kids that probably don’t know much either.

Me too! I am obsessively private and forbid any of my family from telling anyone anything!! Feel for her as she's clearly quite a naturally shy person. Even more impressive she carries out her public role so we'll IMHO.

Omg I hope you're not American, this boot licking is so embarrassing.

I'm happy and grateful to be a citizen of a country with a constitutional monarchy and King as Head of State and Head of the Courts.

It's a system that works well for many countries. Ofc there are alternatives, Macron, Putin, Trump. Each to their own. Our Kings and Queens do not in my view have any kind of life I envy. But QE2 was there with her tupperware and Christianity and a calendar of public duties which put many 'public servants' to shame.

RiP Queen Elizabeth! Long Live the King!

I don't give a shit what your pathetic little island believes in. Go ahead and worship your god king for all I care. But we, the best country on earth, don't believe that we should be ruled by someone because he came out of the right vagina. Any Americans who Stan for the BRF should be ashamed of themselves.

I agree with you about about monarchies, but the bolded is dumb too.

Ok name a better one. America invented electricity, the telephone, the car, the airplane, the internet. We have the most Nobel prizes and Olympic medals. We create 90+% of the world's film and television. We're the oldest existing democracy.

All without Kate Middleton's help. Imagine that.

Pp if you don't like her why are you here? At the very least she is mother to three children and wife and they all love her. It isn't about accomplishing things!

It is about accomplishing things when the taxpayers PAY HER to accomplish things! And you're not the posting police. I feel bad for her. That doesn't negate the drain she is to British taxpayers.

Kate is allowed sick days just like any other human. Most people don't invent anything and yet their lives are important.

I hope she gets better soon

I'm sure the Princess is very moved by you sticking up for her. Hopefully some day you can meet her and give her a big curtsy to show her that you acknowledge that she's better than you.

:roll: Good grief I am just treating her the way I would want to be treated. I have no desire to meet her or get a big hug. I even wish you a healthy life even though you are being mean to someone who has done nothing to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

My mom was only in the hospital for 3 days following her mastectomy.

[Anonymous]

I have limited interest in the royal family but am actually kind of eager for more info about this because I may have similar health issues and I have an extremely similar profile to KM -- almost the exact same age, similar height and weight and fitness level, also had severe HG in pregnancy. I probably don't have the same thing she has but what I've discovered in the last 6 months is that abdominal pain can be tricky to diagnose because so many major systems reside in your gut and there is also some interplay between them (i.e. gynecological issues can cause intestinal issues, kidney stones can make menstrual cramps worse, gut issues can cause inflammation that makes everything worse).

Anyway, I wish her a swift recovery and minimal discomfort. I'm sure she has the best possible care, I wish everyone did, but that doesn't mean it's easy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

I went home 3 hours after my surgery for breast cancer

[Anonymous]

Maybe some kind of colitis? MIL has had this 2-3 times and each one required an extended stay in the hospital. After the most recent episode they wanted to do surgery and remove part of her colon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The USA, due to its peculiar and inhumane medical costs, sends people home to deal with their problems by themselves WAY earlier than European or Asian first world countries.

So a one week stay in an American hospital for something serious can very well be a two week stay in a European or Japanese hospital.

Yup! For an “easy” birth, 48 hrs for US hospitals, 5 days for Japanese hospitals. I had an emergency C-section and nurses were badgering me about when I would be leaving about 48 hrs afterward; I stayed for 5 days which was as long as my insurance would pay for. In Japan it would have been 10 days.

Maybe Japan is different but in the United Kingdom at NHS hospitals, the stay is SHORTER than at US hospitals. The standard procedure at NHS hospitals is to discharge the patient after 6 to 24 hours after a "normal" birth.

I thought the NHS was supposed to be superior. That's horrible!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:14 days for a royal is short, she will be in a recovery facility with spa treatment silver service dining and wated on hand and foot. By contrast y auntie gave birth at home(no pain relief) and then cooked the evening dinner for her husband.

Are you really keen to eat after serious abdominal surgery?

I read every post and my takeaway is that this poster's poor auntie has the worst husband.

14 days for a royal is short, she will be in a recovery facility with spa treatment silver service dining and wated on hand and foot. By contrast y auntie gave birth at home(no pain relief) and then cooked the evening dinner for her husband.

[Anonymous]

I don't know if any of our medical experiences - procedures, hospital stay, or recovery - are comparable to how the health care of a princess in the UK may be handled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The USA, due to its peculiar and inhumane medical costs, sends people home to deal with their problems by themselves WAY earlier than European or Asian first world countries.

So a one week stay in an American hospital for something serious can very well be a two week stay in a European or Japanese hospital.

Yup! For an “easy” birth, 48 hrs for US hospitals, 5 days for Japanese hospitals. I had an emergency C-section and nurses were badgering me about when I would be leaving about 48 hrs afterward; I stayed for 5 days which was as long as my insurance would pay for. In Japan it would have been 10 days.

Maybe Japan is different but in the United Kingdom at NHS hospitals, the stay is SHORTER than at US hospitals. The standard procedure at NHS hospitals is to discharge the patient after 6 to 24 hours after a "normal" birth.

When I had my first child here in DC, he was born at noon and they discharged me at 9:00am the following morning. Congress mandated a longer stay between my first and second born. With my second, I had him at 9pm on Friday and they discharged me before noon on Sunday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

It reads like that to me in the People article.

That is what a TV reporter said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How in the hell does this get to 30 pages in a day? Can somebody summarize. I'm interested but nto 30 pages interested.

I do love the brit who is part German and maybe born in Equador. She's darling.

Kate Middleton had abdominal surgery, 10+ days hospital recovery, 3 months return to activity. Likely not hysterectomy due to hospital recovery time. General consensus is colon issues, as that’s a specialty of the hospital and would match with recovery time. Some think plastic surgery or eating disorders/addiction recovery. Questions over how long the problem has been going on/when surgery became necessary. Markle makes first appearance on p 27.

Eating disorders do not result in abdominal surgery.

Ulcers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

noncancerous abdominal surgery requiring 14 day hospital stay is not breast cancer

[Anonymous]

All of you are going down the rabbit hole about abdominal surgery but you're forgetting that that is simply what their PR office said. We have no way of knowing if it's true. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me at all if it had nothing to do with abdominal surgery and they are just staying that to bury whatever it really is. These people spin everything to make themselves come across as perfect as possible. Telling the public that it's abdominal surgery is broad enough to encompass a variety of possibilities and they don't have to be any more specific. It's also something that the public won't be able to visibly confirm (yes, even ostomy bags can be discreet).

My money is on some type of in-patient treatment for an ED or mental health issues. And before the PP comes at me with the list of specialties at this hospital--do you really think the BRF is going to let Kate check into a hospital that is known for treating EDs or mental health issues? Of course not. They'd send her somewhere else to throw people off and tie into whatever spin they are giving the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How in the hell does this get to 30 pages in a day? Can somebody summarize. I'm interested but nto 30 pages interested.

I do love the brit who is part German and maybe born in Equador. She's darling.

Kate Middleton had abdominal surgery, 10+ days hospital recovery, 3 months return to activity. Likely not hysterectomy due to hospital recovery time. General consensus is colon issues, as that’s a specialty of the hospital and would match with recovery time. Some think plastic surgery or eating disorders/addiction recovery. Questions over how long the problem has been going on/when surgery became necessary. Markle makes first appearance on p 27.

Eating disorders do not result in abdominal surgery.

Ulcers.

Those are caused by H. pylori, which is bacteria aquired in childhood. Anorexia and/or bulimia do not result in anything requiring surgery. Bulimia will destroy your teeth though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The USA, due to its peculiar and inhumane medical costs, sends people home to deal with their problems by themselves WAY earlier than European or Asian first world countries.

So a one week stay in an American hospital for something serious can very well be a two week stay in a European or Japanese hospital.

Yup! For an “easy” birth, 48 hrs for US hospitals, 5 days for Japanese hospitals. I had an emergency C-section and nurses were badgering me about when I would be leaving about 48 hrs afterward; I stayed for 5 days which was as long as my insurance would pay for. In Japan it would have been 10 days.

Maybe Japan is different but in the United Kingdom at NHS hospitals, the stay is SHORTER than at US hospitals. The standard procedure at NHS hospitals is to discharge the patient after 6 to 24 hours after a "normal" birth.

I thought the NHS was supposed to be superior. That's horrible!

They prefer it I think. They get a midwife to come check on them at home in the days after the birth.