Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how you all will attack and then when proven wrong, will move on to the next thing to attack. It doesn't dawn on you that this is a hate/smear campaign?

How many lies need to be unproven before you lay off?

Nobody has to appease you. It's a discussion forum. If you can't handle the heat get out of the kitchen.

So...never? Got it. Their money train chugs along.

That should please you. What's the problem?

It neither pleases nor displeases. Their money is theirs. Just like their life. I have my own to live. You should try it.

DP. If you don’t want to talk about H&M, then why are you posting on this thread? This thread is literally for talking about H&M; that is its purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how you all will attack and then when proven wrong, will move on to the next thing to attack. It doesn't dawn on you that this is a hate/smear campaign?

How many lies need to be unproven before you lay off?

Nobody has to appease you. It's a discussion forum. If you can't handle the heat get out of the kitchen.

So...never? Got it. Their money train chugs along.

That should please you. What's the problem?

It neither pleases nor displeases. Their money is theirs. Just like their life. I have my own to live. You should try it.

Take your own advice, maybe? Doesn’t sound like much of a life if you’re spending most of it hanging out on this thread.

[Anonymous]

So who wants to place their bets now on the first photo of Lilbet being auctioned off to People magazine? Like Brad and Angelina Joile minus the donating of the proceeds to charity. If the Jolie-Pitts got 14 million how much do you think the Markles will rake in?

[Anonymous]

Is People a Sussex mouthpiece? It will go to one of their favored publications.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who wants to place their bets now on the first photo of Lilbet being auctioned off to People magazine? Like Brad and Angelina Joile minus the donating of the proceeds to charity. If the Jolie-Pitts got 14 million how much do you think the Markles will rake in?

Was Archie’s pic auctioned off? And for how much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who wants to place their bets now on the first photo of Lilbet being auctioned off to People magazine? Like Brad and Angelina Joile minus the donating of the proceeds to charity. If the Jolie-Pitts got 14 million how much do you think the Markles will rake in?

For a 2nd baby? Not much. The interest is always more for the first. The second usually looks about the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is People a Sussex mouthpiece? It will go to one of their favored publications.

Omid Scobie is their mouthpiece - so must be going to Harper's Bazaar. We can place on bets on which publication will get the photos too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So who wants to place their bets now on the first photo of Lilbet being auctioned off to People magazine? Like Brad and Angelina Joile minus the donating of the proceeds to charity. If the Jolie-Pitts got 14 million how much do you think the Markles will rake in?

Was Archie’s pic auctioned off? And for how much?

The Sussexes were still royals at that point and had to suffer a public press call. (Which to be fair to new mothers, even Meghan, is probably brutal right after labor and delivery)

Bet they would have if they could have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who wants to place their bets now on the first photo of Lilbet being auctioned off to People magazine? Like Brad and Angelina Joile minus the donating of the proceeds to charity. If the Jolie-Pitts got 14 million how much do you think the Markles will rake in?

Even better they might donate to the new foundation they set up for her or use the existing Archewell Foundation. So, basically paying themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/coasteplife0/status/1403285334767673348?s=20

"Haz" haha doesn't like it when other people use his wife's nickname for him.

Amazing

The hypocrisy is stunning isn't it?

+1. I think they are so self-obsessed and so entitled that they can’t even see their own hypocrisy. (And, as a PP mentioned, of course they are surrounded by “yes” men.)

Beginning to think their PR team hates them as much as the public does.

You might be right.

Ouch.

They've probably dealt with narcissists before, but someone must have advised against going on Oprah. At least one would think.

[Anonymous]

Anyone think they should have gone with Barbara Walters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So who wants to place their bets now on the first photo of Lilbet being auctioned off to People magazine? Like Brad and Angelina Joile minus the donating of the proceeds to charity. If the Jolie-Pitts got 14 million how much do you think the Markles will rake in?

Was Archie’s pic auctioned off? And for how much?

They were still ostensibly working royals then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone think they should have gone with Barbara Walters?

no

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how you all will attack and then when proven wrong, will move on to the next thing to attack. It doesn't dawn on you that this is a hate/smear campaign?

How many lies need to be unproven before you lay off?

Nobody has to appease you. It's a discussion forum. If you can't handle the heat get out of the kitchen.

So...never? Got it. Their money train chugs along.

That should please you. What's the problem?

It neither pleases nor displeases. Their money is theirs. Just like their life. I have my own to live. You should try it.

You trolling this thread to cluck at other women is living a life? Huh. Take your own advice, love.

I spend select idle time to promote positivity. You use it to criticize and be a harpy. You're def not my love.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone think they should have gone with Barbara Walters?

Probably not from their stand point. Barbara is a real journalist and may have asked some tough questions. Oprah just sat there, and if I recall it had long been taped. Therefore she could have checked out all the lies Meghan told, but didn't. For example when she claimed her sister only started using that name after she was dating Harry. Then Samantha showed her degree with Markle on it, lol. And Meghan at her graduation. Hard to say what Barbara would do, but Oprah is going to go along with the political agenda. Not to mention they are all neighbors now.