Senior Trump Official Pens Op-Ed in the NYT calling President Amoral

Anonymous
Some stunning mastery of the obvious here. By Wikileaks, not The Onion.

“Based upon our statistical analysis of the language used in the New York Times anonymous Op Ed, the author is likely to be an older (58%), conservative (92%) male (66-87%).”

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sarah Huckabee Sanders

“Sander’s evangelical faith is her lodestar; according to her husband, Bryan Sanders”

https://theslot.jezebel.com/the-complicity-of-sarah-huckabee-sanders-1825597216


it is not this hillbilly cow.


I just love liberals. If the woman is a conservative, their appearance is fair game. But hands off if she's a liberal!


And I love hillbillies. And cows. Also, Sarah Huckabee Sanders has a glass eye (which is funny!)


Is it though?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love how this is clearly keeping liberals up at night, heads exploding. You guys love the speculation! So exciting!


Liberals' heads exploding? Is that why Trump is going batsh-t??

+1 Everytime someone criticizes him, he goes batsh1t crazy. So easy to trigger, which for a POTUS, is dangerous.


I am a liberal and sleep like a baby, because I know I called out all the Trump supporters that I know before this disaster.


And you deserve a whole jar of cookies. Feel better?
Anonymous
Am I the only one who thinks it was John Kelly?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks it was John Kelly?


He hasn't said he didn't write it yet, has he? (as of 12:36am Friday)
Anonymous
Senior Whitehouse official? I heard there was a senior gardner. Does that mean someone who works at the Whitehouse who is over 65?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Senior Whitehouse official? I heard there was a senior gardner. Does that mean someone who works at the Whitehouse who is over 65?


Might be the same doorman that claimed to know about Trump’s illegitimate child!

I love how anonymous sources are the bread and butter of those with TDS, everything is to be believed as long as it makes Trump look bad, yet when it’s a positive news article it must be a lie.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Some stunning mastery of the obvious here. By Wikileaks, not The Onion.

“Based upon our statistical analysis of the language used in the New York Times anonymous Op Ed, the author is likely to be an older (58%), conservative (92%) male (66-87%).”



Really? They may have written in a very different style. Lol, like I do when I wrote notes from Santa. It’s easy to disguise your writing. Either don’t while you write. Or go back at the end and edit your sentence structure.
Anonymous
Ivanka.

And what is nhs?
Anonymous
Woodward is obviously the intermediary.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Senior Whitehouse official? I heard there was a senior gardner. Does that mean someone who works at the Whitehouse who is over 65?


Might be the same doorman that claimed to know about Trump’s illegitimate child!

I love how anonymous sources are the bread and butter of those with TDS, everything is to be believed as long as it makes Trump look bad, yet when it’s a positive news article it must be a lie.



Trump makes Trump look bad, on twitter, every day.
Anonymous
I don't think the Times would have published it if it wasn't someone truly senior. But, maybe I give them too much credit.
Anonymous
I think it’s John Kelly
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love how this is clearly keeping liberals up at night, heads exploding. You guys love the speculation! So exciting!


Liberals' heads exploding? Is that why Trump is going batsh-t??


Well, clearly liberals are falling over themselves, trying to figure out whodunnit. Case in point, DCUM regulars.


Oh honey if you think WH staffers and others in the administration aren’t also “falling over themselves” trying to figure out whodunnit then you haven’t been paying attention. Case in point, all the sycophants delivers letters to the Oval Office assuring Spanky of their undying loyalty and that they absolutely DID NOT WRITE that nasty old editorial
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love how this is clearly keeping liberals up at night, heads exploding. You guys love the speculation! So exciting!


Liberals' heads exploding? Is that why Trump is going batsh-t??


Well, clearly liberals are falling over themselves, trying to figure out whodunnit. Case in point, DCUM regulars.


Oh honey if you think WH staffers and others in the administration aren’t also “falling over themselves” trying to figure out whodunnit then you haven’t been paying attention. Case in point, all the sycophants delivers letters to the Oval Office assuring Spanky of their undying loyalty and that they absolutely DID NOT WRITE that nasty old editorial

+1 Trump wants them to take a lie detector test. I'd say that's pretty desperate.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: