Russians Compromising Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he truly has nothing to hide, he will allow for an Independent Counsel, reporting to a truly bipartisan committee of Congress to have complete and total access to all materials, and also all the materials of anyone he works with. Let the Independent Counsel crawl up his ass with a microscope, so we all can learn there's nothing shady in his background. If he wants to put this to rest, he must submit to complete and detailed transparency with public reporting.

I predict he will never do anything like that because he's dirty as hell.

For sure. 100%.

[Anonymous]

Fake news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny....in the other thread last week a number of us said that the LAST group Trump wants to pick a public fight with is the intelligence folks. That they could sink his presidency at their whim. A lot of you came in and "downplayed" what we said while also denigrating the competence of the US intelligence community. Well.... And even if THIS is not true, I suspect that he will be fending off this sort of stuff for the foreseeable future. Folks, in politics information is power!

This is strange. Shouldn't we all be worried that the secret agencies have this power? I hate the electoral college (past DC voter!), but the worst view of that beats this idea that the American Mukharabat (google it kids!) has power over the elected government.

Well, it has been this way since the birth of our nation. More recently, Hoover was known to be untouchable because of it. So...I suppose you or I can be worried about it. But if you intend to play in Washington, you doggone sure better be worried about it. Like I said, information is power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MSNBC just reported (Cynthia McFadden) that Trump was not briefed on the addendum. That the addendum was an example of DISINFORMATION that the briefers were prepared to present should Trump not understand the gravity/importance of the analysis of intelligence or something like that. It is not valid.
She also reported that there is NO evidence of collusion between campaign and Russia.

Remember, Trump campaign adviser and Nixon fetishist Roger Stone who boasted/previewed Wikileaks releases before they happened? This is almost prima facie evidence of collusion with Assange and the Russians and puts Trump between a stone and a hard place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he truly has nothing to hide, he will allow for an Independent Counsel, reporting to a truly bipartisan committee of Congress to have complete and total access to all materials, and also all the materials of anyone he works with. Let the Independent Counsel crawl up his ass with a microscope, so we all can learn there's nothing shady in his background. If he wants to put this to rest, he must submit to complete and detailed transparency with public reporting.

I predict he will never do anything like that because he's dirty as hell.

He has everything to hide or he would release his taxes. Just saying. Dirty crooked Trump!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSNBC just reported (Cynthia McFadden) that Trump was not briefed on the addendum. That the addendum was an example of DISINFORMATION that the briefers were prepared to present should Trump not understand the gravity/importance of the analysis of intelligence or something like that. It is not valid.
She also reported that there is NO evidence of collusion between campaign and Russia.

Remember, Trump campaign adviser and Nixon fetishist Roger Stone who boasted/previewed Wikileaks releases before they happened? This is almost prima facie evidence of collusion with Assange and the Russians and puts Trump between a stone and a hard place.

Oh bah. There was nothing wrong with that then. Nobody commented or raised their eyebrows at the time. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fake news.

I sincerely hope so. It's too disastrous to even contemplate....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny....in the other thread last week a number of us said that the LAST group Trump wants to pick a public fight with is the intelligence folks. That they could sink his presidency at their whim. A lot of you came in and "downplayed" what we said while also denigrating the competence of the US intelligence community. Well.... And even if THIS is not true, I suspect that he will be fending off this sort of stuff for the foreseeable future. Folks, in politics information is power!

This is strange. Shouldn't we all be worried that the secret agencies have this power? I hate the electoral college (past DC voter!), but the worst view of that beats this idea that the American Mukharabat (google it kids!) has power over the elected government.

Well, it has been this way since the birth of our nation. More recently, Hoover was known to be untouchable because of it. So...I suppose you or I can be worried about it. But if you intend to play in Washington, you doggone sure better be worried about it. Like I said, information is power.

This is true: there's always someone out there to be scared of. But the casualness in public is worrisome. And no dynasty lasts forever. And transitions between dynasties can be very interesting times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny....in the other thread last week a number of us said that the LAST group Trump wants to pick a public fight with is the intelligence folks. That they could sink his presidency at their whim. A lot of you came in and "downplayed" what we said while also denigrating the competence of the US intelligence community. Well.... And even if THIS is not true, I suspect that he will be fending off this sort of stuff for the foreseeable future. Folks, in politics information is power!

This is strange. Shouldn't we all be worried that the secret agencies have this power? I hate the electoral college (past DC voter!), but the worst view of that beats this idea that the American Mukharabat (google it kids!) has power over the elected government.

Well, it has been this way since the birth of our nation. More recently, Hoover was known to be untouchable because of it. So...I suppose you or I can be worried about it. But if you intend to play in Washington, you doggone sure better be worried about it. Like I said, information is power.

This is true: there's always someone out there to be scared of. But the casualness in public is worrisome. And no dynasty lasts forever. And transitions between dynasties can be very interesting times.

Believe me the intel community is largely conservative/Republican. Why are you even debating this if you think it is a fake news story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fake News is interesting when 4chan is long known for their pranks.

4chan, ZeroHedge, and Reddit are compromised by Russian intelligence psy-op campaigns. Probably American, too.

ZeroHedge especially has gone off the deep-end the past year to support Putin. Pretty shocking - I know a lot really smart finance guys who read it religiously and lap it up. They've managed to be convinced that their hatred for Obama/Democrats is more powerful than their hatred for a leader who is trying to undermine American democracy.

Capitalist greed continues to be America's Achilles heel.

And the right wing radio hosts are citing ZeroHege and 4Chan in their daily round ups. That's legitimate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSNBC just reported (Cynthia McFadden) that Trump was not briefed on the addendum. That the addendum was an example of DISINFORMATION that the briefers were prepared to present should Trump not understand the gravity/importance of the analysis of intelligence or something like that. It is not valid.
She also reported that there is NO evidence of collusion between campaign and Russia.

Remember, Trump campaign adviser and Nixon fetishist Roger Stone who boasted/previewed Wikileaks releases before they happened? This is almost prima facie evidence of collusion with Assange and the Russians and puts Trump between a stone and a hard place.

Oh bah. There was nothing wrong with that then. Nobody commented or raised their eyebrows at the time. /s

That is outright wrong. There were plenty in this forum as an example, me included, who were calling it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fake News is interesting when 4chan is long known for their pranks.

4chan, ZeroHedge, and Reddit are compromised by Russian intelligence psy-op campaigns. Probably American, too.

ZeroHedge especially has gone off the deep-end the past year to support Putin. Pretty shocking - I know a lot really smart finance guys who read it religiously and lap it up. They've managed to be convinced that their hatred for Obama/Democrats is more powerful than their hatred for a leader who is trying to undermine American democracy.

Capitalist greed continues to be America's Achilles heel.

And the right wing radio hosts are citing ZeroHege and 4Chan in their daily round ups. That's legitimate.

Ugh. It's embarrassing.

We've all lost our minds, and we elected a liar for president.

[Anonymous]

If he has nothing to hide why is he denying trips to Russia when we all know he's been there because of television.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:If he has nothing to hide why is he denying trips to Russia when we all know he's been there because of television.

He didn't deny trips to Russia. That was misinformation by a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSNBC just reported (Cynthia McFadden) that Trump was not briefed on the addendum. That the addendum was an example of DISINFORMATION that the briefers were prepared to present should Trump not understand the gravity/importance of the analysis of intelligence or something like that. It is not valid.
She also reported that there is NO evidence of collusion between campaign and Russia.

Remember, Trump campaign adviser and Nixon fetishist Roger Stone who boasted/previewed Wikileaks releases before they happened? This is almost prima facie evidence of collusion with Assange and the Russians and puts Trump between a stone and a hard place.

Oh bah. There was nothing wrong with that then. Nobody commented or raised their eyebrows at the time. /s

That is outright wrong. There were plenty in this forum as an example, me included, who were calling it out.

Yes, it is wrong. That's why I put the "/s" there.