Really freaked out after reading an "Incel" blog

[Anonymous]

Tib is obsessed with the US because that is where he lives.

He says on his blog that he is on social security.
He mentioned admiring Mormons, Hasidic Jews, and the Amish; all predominantly American religious sects.
He has a very American understanding of feminism, child support, and divorce.
His English is clearly native, and his linguistic lexicon is very obviously American.

I just pray he doesn't live in my city because he is a mass-shooter in the making.

[Anonymous]

There are so many similarities between Rogers' manifesto and Tib's blogging that it is truly frightening. I just skimmed one on his posts on love shyness and the obsessive recounting of so many minor details, year by year, read just like Rogers' manifesto. Really scary.

[Anonymous]

Echo chamber effect of being on the same websites?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Echo chamber effect of being on the same websites?

Maybe but I think more likely they both have the same kind of personality disorder. I, for one, wish I had never gone done this incel rabbit hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Echo chamber effect of being on the same websites?

Rodgers was never on LS.com. He was a poster on PUAHate (so much for imbecilic feminists and manginas calling him a PUA).

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are so many similarities between Rogers' manifesto and Tib's blogging that it is truly frightening. I just skimmed one on his posts on love shyness and the obsessive recounting of so many minor details, year by year, read just like Rogers' manifesto. Really scary.

Lots of people talk about how they know or are related to narcissists, psychopaths, sociopaths, etc. Those people may have glimpses of those behaviors, but if you read either his website or Rogers' manifesto, you'll see what true sociopath and person with extreme Narcissistic Personality Disorder looks like. It's not just about selfishness - those two people are/were severely disturbed (influenced by very real misogyny, but taken to a massive extreme).

That said, I feel like the manifesto should be required reading for parents - especially parents of boys. Behavior and attitudes like these need to be caught early, and nipped in the bud - even when they start out as seemingly benign feeling of disappointment.

[Anonymous]

I spoke with friends who are parents of teens. The boys all knew about incels and pua but thought it was a joke before this weekend. The girls had no idea before this weekend and were all worried about the impact of turning a guy down.

Definitely, we parents have a lot of catching up to do when it comes to the sexual or non sexual lives of our adolescents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are so many similarities between Rogers' manifesto and Tib's blogging that it is truly frightening. I just skimmed one on his posts on love shyness and the obsessive recounting of so many minor details, year by year, read just like Rogers' manifesto. Really scary.

Lots of people talk about how they know or are related to narcissists, psychopaths, sociopaths, etc. Those people may have glimpses of those behaviors, but if you read either his website or Rogers' manifesto, you'll see what true sociopath and person with extreme Narcissistic Personality Disorder looks like. It's not just about selfishness - those two people are/were severely disturbed (influenced by very real misogyny, but taken to a massive extreme).

That said, I feel like the manifesto should be required reading for parents - especially parents of boys. Behavior and attitudes like these need to be caught early, and nipped in the bud - even when they start out as seemingly benign feeling of disappointment.

Agree with you 100%. On both points.

I had a very good friend in high school who was very depressed about his inability to have a girlfriend. He also had an obsessive crush on me because I was one of the few people that was kind to him. I talked him through some very dark times and while he never expressed any wishes of violence toward anyone, and in fact was and still is one of the most gentle souls I know, I can't help but wonder why he was able to work through his teen angst and become a productive adult with healthy relationships and other cannot. I suppose it is the underlying mental illness of people like Rodgers and Tib. My friend had a tendency towards depression but was not a narcissist or sociopath.

I have two young sons and will be remembering all of this as they move toward adolescence.

[Anonymous]

Time to de stigmatize treatment for mental illness. Parents fear ruining their kids' life by getting them help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Time to de stigmatize treatment for mental illness. Parents fear ruining their kids' life by getting them help.

So why don't you get treatment then? "People" who believe that feminism should exist must all be locked up.

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Echo chamber effect of being on the same websites?

Maybe but I think more likely they both have the same kind of-nonsense-. I, for one, wish I had never gone done this incel rabbit hole.

So, you reject psychiatry and think it bs?

Because if you weren't you wouldn't diagnose online, right?

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: And, loser, a lot of people are "incel" a lot of the time without losing their ability to work, help others, and contribute to society. So funny that you see yourself as moral.

These people have some severe emotional and physical problems if incel doesn't bother them. Then again, you don't even know what incel is. You think it's being picky, because you were can't be incel as a woman.

And incels who are paying taxes are the worst kind of monsters in the world - how can they pay taxes to government which makes them incel in the first place via woman's suffrage/alimony/child support etc??

tib

you don't like child support either? what is your opinion about it exactly?

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/08/24/the-child-support-catastrophe/

You have to understand that child support actually benefits sluts, not children. What is best for the child isn't to receive child support but live with both parents. Child support laws also benefit male politicians, as they make women keep voting for them.

http://www.biblicjudaism.org/Liberalism-td105.html

Another Liberal lie is that Liberals support equality and are more caring. This lie can be seen in dating. The most egalitarian dating system is monogamy because then everyone gets a mate. Liberals hate monogamy and support promiscuity which is the most unequal mating system. With promiscuity, some men get many women and many men get no women. It is extreme reproductive and sexual inequality. Liberals support this system because it is immoral and selfish. But this also explains why Liberals are so concerned about women and children, or at least say they are. Liberal men are concerned that women and children are cared for because they are promiscuous and so have no idea who their children are, so they want children generally cared for. It's true that contraception changes this practically, but it doesn't change the instinct. The promiscuous male instinct is to care about women and children, but not care about other men. The monogamous male instinct is to be part of a loyal male group and care for that group where each man has his wife. Of course the Liberal caring for children is also a kind of lie. Liberals only care that children are provided for, they don't really care what is in the child's best interest because that would be having both parents there to raise the child. Liberal men care about economic equality because they do not want to compete for women on the basis of how good a provider they are, but only based on their seduction skills. Economic freedom allows men to attract women as wives based on their ability to provide and this removes these women from the shared harem enjoyed by Liberal men. Of course Liberal women support economic equality because they want to be provided for.

tib

TIB, what if both parents staying together just isn't possible. Say, the wife/mother had issues, she keeps cheating on her husband, she's abusive toward him, etc. So, the Husband/Father divorces her and gets custody of their child. How would you feel about the husband receiving child support from his ex-wife, since he has custody? Is child support still bad?

[Anonymous]

tib, Do your parents know about your blog, and have they read it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:tib, Do your parents know about your blog, and have they read it?

I'm sure his parents know. He assaulted his parents (and was arrested), because his mom wouldn't have sex with him. I'm sure they know just how disturbed their son is.

[Anonymous]

TIB, are you the author of that blog Governmentsgetgirlfriends that the HuffPost article was about? (I think I saw that you said you were earlier in this thread, but that you don't believe that is a plausible solution anymore...but this thread is so long I couldn't find it when I went back to check).