Elyse Johnson (affluent beggar)

[Anonymous]

So according to their own story, when Jason was 21 he “saved” Elyse who was 16 and that makes everyone else a pedophile? Are pedophiles and statutory rapists the same thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So according to their own story, when Jason was 21 he “saved” Elyse who was 16 and that makes everyone else a pedophile? Are pedophiles and statutory rapists the same thing?

Yeah, I’ve wondered about that, i think she had their first kid when she was 17

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So according to their own story, when Jason was 21 he “saved” Elyse who was 16 and that makes everyone else a pedophile? Are pedophiles and statutory rapists the same thing?

Yeah, I’ve wondered about that, i think she had their first kid when she was 17

Don’t know how old she was then. Now she is in her 40s and libeling people on Go Fund Me for sympathy cash. Go Fund me is exposing itself to legal action. Everywhere they go, before children and since, they alienate themselves from the community. The story has too many holes and wears thinner over time.

[Anonymous]

They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

[Anonymous]

Her Facebook is set to private. Is she ranting there too? Kalish/Jason rants on Twitter, but he just sounds delusional and crazed. I don't think he has said anything that would inspire legal action. Maybe time with a therapist/life coach/philosophical remediation, but not a lawyer. If the long arm of the law steps in, maybe relatives can step in and take care of the children.

[Anonymous]

Right. For them it will confirm that pedophiles have taken over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

She didn't give away kids--they got paid.

They rake in money ostensibly for cancer treatment and recovery of one child who is in her teens now. Well, if you haven't learned to read Braille after what 13, 15 years yet they kept collecting money for this. Apparently the kid is no longer blind in any case.

one of the reasons she kept having kids, so when she's talking about her daughter's cancer treatment, the people from whom she was begging from would assume it's the baby she had with her--not the 10, 12 year old etc. sometimes her son would be holding the walking stick intended for blind people. The kids are props to garner sympathy and like child stars are not particularly appealing the older they get.

When she discovered the internet, it made her "work" a lot easier. They both probably have mental health issues but are still laughing all the way to the bank or wherever they keep their dough. It's all untaxed income.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right. For them it will confirm that pedophiles have taken over.

I don’t really understand their thing with pedophiles, especially since Jason got with her when she was a minor...

[Anonymous]

Why are people engaging with what is obviously an extremely agitated paranoid schizophrenic? This is unbelievable--what is happening here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

+1

Hope he doesn't have a gun--he sounds like a ticking time bomb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

+1

Hope he doesn't have a gun--he sounds like a ticking time bomb.

He's probably more likely to bore people to death

[Anonymous]

Yes. Jason calls people abusive names and uses violent language. He sounds cornered and ready to strike. Elyse rants about pedophiles and her knight, Jason. If, in fact, it is Elyse who composes these posts. Jason has said she is ”subordinated.” He thinks he is smart and talks about his 139 IQ. LOL. Therefore, he will justify any means available for his family. I think that none of us would care except for the children. Are these people really under the radar? They shouldn’t be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

She didn't give away kids--they got paid.

They rake in money ostensibly for cancer treatment and recovery of one child who is in her teens now. Well, if you haven't learned to read Braille after what 13, 15 years yet they kept collecting money for this. Apparently the kid is no longer blind in any case.

one of the reasons she kept having kids, so when she's talking about her daughter's cancer treatment, the people from whom she was begging from would assume it's the baby she had with her--not the 10, 12 year old etc. sometimes her son would be holding the walking stick intended for blind people. The kids are props to garner sympathy and like child stars are not particularly appealing the older they get.

When she discovered the internet, it made her "work" a lot easier. They both probably have mental health issues but are still laughing all the way to the bank or wherever they keep their dough. It's all untaxed income.

I’m not saying that they aren’t con artists or if what you say is true, engaged in deceptive, exploitative behavior. But they don’t sound affluent. They sound deeply screwed up and incapable of a normal life. The husband’s rants here have been profoundly abnormal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

She didn't give away kids--they got paid.

They rake in money ostensibly for cancer treatment and recovery of one child who is in her teens now. Well, if you haven't learned to read Braille after what 13, 15 years yet they kept collecting money for this. Apparently the kid is no longer blind in any case.

one of the reasons she kept having kids, so when she's talking about her daughter's cancer treatment, the people from whom she was begging from would assume it's the baby she had with her--not the 10, 12 year old etc. sometimes her son would be holding the walking stick intended for blind people. The kids are props to garner sympathy and like child stars are not particularly appealing the older they get.

When she discovered the internet, it made her "work" a lot easier. They both probably have mental health issues but are still laughing all the way to the bank or wherever they keep their dough. It's all untaxed income.

I’m not saying that they aren’t con artists or if what you say is true, engaged in deceptive, exploitative behavior. But they don’t sound affluent. They sound deeply screwed up and incapable of a normal life. The husband’s rants here have been profoundly abnormal.

My uncle was schizophrenic, Jason’s ramblings seem all too familiar to me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t really sound like affluent beggers. Married at 16, gave away kids... and frankly the posts from the husband do not sound like the words of a high functioning person. Or a functional person, full stop. It’s sad.

She didn't give away kids--they got paid.

They rake in money ostensibly for cancer treatment and recovery of one child who is in her teens now. Well, if you haven't learned to read Braille after what 13, 15 years yet they kept collecting money for this. Apparently the kid is no longer blind in any case.

one of the reasons she kept having kids, so when she's talking about her daughter's cancer treatment, the people from whom she was begging from would assume it's the baby she had with her--not the 10, 12 year old etc. sometimes her son would be holding the walking stick intended for blind people. The kids are props to garner sympathy and like child stars are not particularly appealing the older they get.

When she discovered the internet, it made her "work" a lot easier. They both probably have mental health issues but are still laughing all the way to the bank or wherever they keep their dough. It's all untaxed income.

I’m not saying that they aren’t con artists or if what you say is true, engaged in deceptive, exploitative behavior. But they don’t sound affluent. They sound deeply screwed up and incapable of a normal life. The husband’s rants here have been profoundly abnormal.

Affluent means rich. They have made lots of untaxed income. So it's an appropriate moniker to some degree.