Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

Exactly and some of the adoptions were questionable as well.

None of the adoptions were questionable. If anything, the adoptions were more transparent than most because they were very public. All of her adoptive children were in orphanages. I guess some of you would rather the children languish in an orphanage. Until you have fostered or adopted a child, you have no standing. Just ghouls opinion from the outside always finding fault, but never solutions.

Yes, they were. I have adopted a child and worked within the system so you have no idea what you are talking about and many adoptions are questionable. Some of those countries were not part of the Hauge and some were not orphans. It was public as she needs to stay relevant so those kids were how. This kids would have been better off with someone else. Money does not buy good parenting and a healthy life.

Sureee you do 😂

You clearly have no clue about adoption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

Angelina doesn’t care about you or have any idea who you are. You sound way too invested in Angelina’s life. You attacking other posters on behalf of Angelina doesn’t endear you to her.

This is a gossip board. We don’t know these people. It’s escapist entertainment to post about celebrities. I can only comment on Angelina based on her public image and how she represents herself to the public. I don’t have a good impression of her, given what I know of her behavior going back decades. There are plenty of celebrities who are non-controversial and generate little ill will. The hate Angelina gets is a result of her own behavior - wearing blood necklaces, kissing her brother on the lips, attention seeking interviews, breaking up multiple relationships, using her kids for publicity, the nasty divorce and the PR campaign and attempt to destroy Brad that she launched, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

Angelina doesn’t care about you or have any idea who you are. You sound way too invested in Angelina’s life. You attacking other posters on behalf of Angelina doesn’t endear you to her.

This is a gossip board. We don’t know these people. It’s escapist entertainment to post about celebrities. I can only comment on Angelina based on her public image and how she represents herself to the public. I don’t have a good impression of her, given what I know of her behavior going back decades. There are plenty of celebrities who are non-controversial and generate little ill will. The hate Angelina gets is a result of her own behavior - wearing blood necklaces, kissing her brother on the lips, attention seeking interviews, breaking up multiple relationships, using her kids for publicity, the nasty divorce and the PR campaign and attempt to destroy Brad that she launched, etc.

LOL Brad did this allllll by himself with his lame PR campaign that can't even include a congratulations to his own kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

Angelina doesn’t care about you or have any idea who you are. You sound way too invested in Angelina’s life. You attacking other posters on behalf of Angelina doesn’t endear you to her.

This is a gossip board. We don’t know these people. It’s escapist entertainment to post about celebrities. I can only comment on Angelina based on her public image and how she represents herself to the public. I don’t have a good impression of her, given what I know of her behavior going back decades. There are plenty of celebrities who are non-controversial and generate little ill will. The hate Angelina gets is a result of her own behavior - wearing blood necklaces, kissing her brother on the lips, attention seeking interviews, breaking up multiple relationships, using her kids for publicity, the nasty divorce and the PR campaign and attempt to destroy Brad that she launched, etc.

LOL Brad did this allllll by himself with his lame PR campaign that can't even include a congratulations to his own kid.

And she created her image aaaalll by herself. It’s not misogyny or jealousy or hating women as her sycophants like to claim.

He doesn’t owe you or any of us anything.He’s going about it the right way. Staying as private as possible where the children are concerned. He’s pretty consistent about that. Their mother on the other hand…

[Anonymous]

Who freaking cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

I really think some of you have forgotten how terrible she was, particularly to other women in hollywood while pursuing only men in relationships. She also looked and acted like a character out of Natural Born Killers for a long while before she suddenly became Saint Angelina.

Everything you wrote above may be true from your perspective and others, but that does not mean your perspective gives you the right to make up lies. Brad had a part in the taking of those photos along with Angelina, yet all the accusations are only leveled at her. He gets a past because you don’t like her for having an affair with him. Brad broke the vows to his wife, not Angelina. Yet somehow the other woman gets scorn, but the man gets a pass. Ridiculous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

I really think some of you have forgotten how terrible she was, particularly to other women in hollywood while pursuing only men in relationships. She also looked and acted like a character out of Natural Born Killers for a long while before she suddenly became Saint Angelina.

So it’s her fault that Billy Bob and Brad cheated on their long term girlfriends and wife?

Please. This woman may not be perfect, but judging from the way she interacts with her adult kids, she’s been a good mom.

And having been in an abusive relationship with a very “charming” man, Brad gives me the ick. He’s not a good guy and he knows it. Hence he’s stayed back from more investigation of his family life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

I really think some of you have forgotten how terrible she was, particularly to other women in hollywood while pursuing only men in relationships. She also looked and acted like a character out of Natural Born Killers for a long while before she suddenly became Saint Angelina.

So it’s her fault that Billy Bob and Brad cheated on their long term girlfriends and wife?

Please. This woman may not be perfect, but judging from the way she interacts with her adult kids, she’s been a good mom.

And having been in an abusive relationship with a very “charming” man, Brad gives me the ick. He’s not a good guy and he knows it. Hence he’s stayed back from more investigation of his family life.

The way laura dern is a serial cheater too. Still one of my favorite actress but what can you do. Banish every celeb that cheats? That's a personal problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

Angelina doesn’t care about you or have any idea who you are. You sound way too invested in Angelina’s life. You attacking other posters on behalf of Angelina doesn’t endear you to her.

This is a gossip board. We don’t know these people. It’s escapist entertainment to post about celebrities. I can only comment on Angelina based on her public image and how she represents herself to the public. I don’t have a good impression of her, given what I know of her behavior going back decades. There are plenty of celebrities who are non-controversial and generate little ill will. The hate Angelina gets is a result of her own behavior - wearing blood necklaces, kissing her brother on the lips, attention seeking interviews, breaking up multiple relationships, using her kids for publicity, the nasty divorce and the PR campaign and attempt to destroy Brad that she launched, etc.

LOL Brad did this allllll by himself with his lame PR campaign that can't even include a congratulations to his own kid.

And she created her image aaaalll by herself. It’s not misogyny or jealousy or hating women as her sycophants like to claim.

He doesn’t owe you or any of us anything.He’s going about it the right way. Staying as private as possible where the children are concerned. He’s pretty consistent about that. Their mother on the other hand…

But hes not staying quiet 🤣 Especially about the children. He hides behind his "sources." We aren't dumb. It's still him at the end of the day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the beginning, Angelina Jolie has been a master act at using her kids to shape her public image. Look back and see how she deflected bad press about her Billy bob breakup with an arranged photo depicting her as a heroic single mom.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nk4.UxBN.zNuy1I9k5U7L&smid=url-share

I lived in ny when her kids were at the lycee. A teacher there told me that the school asked her(along with Madonna) to refrain from using the main school entrance for the safety and privacy of her own kids as well as the other students and parents. Madonna agreed. Angelina refused. She needed those school pickup/dropoff photos for her image.

I would imagine Brad Pitt has similarly skilled PR people, but Angelina seems particularly gifted in this. I’m sure she is studied as a case study for celeb pr agents. I have no idea about who is more at fault, but I would guess they are both egotistical windbags.

She uses her kids for her image. When she called the paparazzi in Kenya to confirm her and Brad’s relationship, she was doting on Maddox and not even touching Brad. She wanted to send the message “we’re a family, not an adulterous relationship.” She then adopted Zahara and highly publicized the adoption to deflect bad publicity. “I’m a humanitarian who adopts needy children, not a homewrecker.” She sold all of her children’s baby photos to the tabloids. I don’t think there is a single celebrity who uses their children for their image like Angelina does. To this day, she walks the red carpet with them, includes them in her photo shoots, etc.

I am really to think that the women on this forum are the most miserable, ugly, jealous women around. Why all the hate for the woman and absolutely none for the man. Brad doesn't want any of you. Brad had input in the selling of the baby pictures and actually talked about it with several publications, but you hags only talk about Angelina making the decision. Brad said "it seems strange that they decided to sell the pictures, but there was a bounty on the kids' heads to get the pictures. It was better for the parents, ie, Brad[i][u] and Angelina to do something good. Therefore, they hired a private photographer to take the pictures and used the money on charities." Brad nor Angelina used the money for personal use but to help others in charities.
https://people.com/parents/brad-pitt-larry/

Angelina doesn’t care about you or have any idea who you are. You sound way too invested in Angelina’s life. You attacking other posters on behalf of Angelina doesn’t endear you to her.

This is a gossip board. We don’t know these people. It’s escapist entertainment to post about celebrities. I can only comment on Angelina based on her public image and how she represents herself to the public. I don’t have a good impression of her, given what I know of her behavior going back decades. There are plenty of celebrities who are non-controversial and generate little ill will. The hate Angelina gets is a result of her own behavior - wearing blood necklaces, kissing her brother on the lips, attention seeking interviews, breaking up multiple relationships, using her kids for publicity, the nasty divorce and the PR campaign and attempt to destroy Brad that she launched, etc.

LOL Brad did this allllll by himself with his lame PR campaign that can't even include a congratulations to his own kid.

And she created her image aaaalll by herself. It’s not misogyny or jealousy or hating women as her sycophants like to claim.

He doesn’t owe you or any of us anything.He’s going about it the right way. Staying as private as possible where the children are concerned. He’s pretty consistent about that. Their mother on the other hand…

But hes not staying quiet 🤣 Especially about the children. He hides behind his "sources." We aren't dumb. It's still him at the end of the day.

"A source close to Pitt tells ET that he wants to reconnect with his and Jolie's six children after being estranged for some time now. "Anyone who knows him is aware of how good of a father that Brad was and how tragic it is that he and his children have been separated," says the source. "Hopefully one day they can put this behind them."

Or my favorite

The Oscar winner — who turns 61 on Dec. 18 — feels like Christmas “won’t be the same” unless he can spend some time with his children..

Funny enough people have caught on how it's nothing but a PR spin to save his image. He should leave them alone.

[Anonymous]

What was the finally sticking point to finalize the divorce?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What was the finally sticking point to finalize the divorce?

she got the upper edge when the judge granted her request for all of his communications. The finalization happened around the deadline h needed to give it to her. She hasn't filed her answer to the winery case either that was due last month. I assume it's on hold while they wrap it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was the finally sticking point to finalize the divorce?

she got the upper edge when the judge granted her request for all of his communications. The finalization happened around the deadline h needed to give it to her. She hasn't filed her answer to the winery case either that was due last month. I assume it's on hold while they wrap it up.

Weren’t those communications related to the winery case which was separated from the divorce and is going to trial. She also never the NDA’s the judge ordered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was the finally sticking point to finalize the divorce?

she got the upper edge when the judge granted her request for all of his communications. The finalization happened around the deadline h needed to give it to her. She hasn't filed her answer to the winery case either that was due last month. I assume it's on hold while they wrap it up.

Weren’t those communications related to the winery case which was separated from the divorce and is going to trial. She also never the NDA’s the judge ordered.

Yes she did hand the NDA's over. You can use evidence across different cases if it's deemed relevancy. Communications surrounding the abuse and the evidence would fulfill that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was the finally sticking point to finalize the divorce?

she got the upper edge when the judge granted her request for all of his communications. The finalization happened around the deadline h needed to give it to her. She hasn't filed her answer to the winery case either that was due last month. I assume it's on hold while they wrap it up.

Weren’t those communications related to the winery case which was separated from the divorce and is going to trial. She also never the NDA’s the judge ordered.

Yes she did hand the NDA's over. You can use evidence across different cases if it's deemed relevancy. Communications surrounding the abuse and the evidence would fulfill that.

Based on your answer then it seems the communications were not the determining factor in the divorce. I assume she’s going to use them in the winery case so they would still, possibly, be made public.