Harris Walz interview w CNN

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was Tim Walz actually necessary in that interview?


It is traditional for both candidates to it for the first interview together.


Absentee ballots go out next week. No one outside of MN has any idea who he is.

We had a whole convention that you could have watched if you weren’t so scared…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Watch the energy view and it's entirety. Was it a hard hitting expose no, it was never supposed to be, but at least her answers were coherent and on topic, which is more than I can say for his deranged press conferences. I will never understand why he continues to get a pass talking about Hannibal lecter for 90 minutes but a Democratic candidate who is concise and answers questions is somehow not looking presidential?


Let's see the unedited interview or better yet a live interview one on one with a reporter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton was so much more competent than Harris. And compare Harris with Obama or Bill Clinton, or even John McCain.

But now because we are unfortunately stuck with Harris, we democrats have to gaslight ourselves and others into thinking that these populist word salads are acceptable. A shame.


Kamala was coherent and concise. She didn’t babble about sharks or Hannibal Lechter for a hour plus like Trump. Most Americans don’t want to hear a detailed in the weeds analysis of policy over the evening news-probably more so in the swing states which are the only ones that really matter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton was so much more competent than Harris. And compare Harris with Obama or Bill Clinton, or even John McCain.

But now because we are unfortunately stuck with Harris, we democrats have to gaslight ourselves and others into thinking that these populist word salads are acceptable. A shame.



And Romney too. It wasn't that long ago that there was an expectation that presidential candidates would generally be informed, competent, and decent human beings.

Now we have Donald Trump, an abomination. And due to the colossal arrogance of Joe Biden and his family - Jill and Hunter - we are in the strange situation where mediocrity gets to fall upwards. Democrats have a lot of talent, but none of them can run for president because of what the Bidens did. Instead, we have two months of fingers-crossed Harris can maintain some basic coherence when speaking without a teleprompter. And in the meantime we all need to pretend she's some awesome, historic candidate that will lead America out of the wilderness.

It's a farce. Even children recognize there are moments in a game when you need a do-over.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton was so much more competent than Harris. And compare Harris with Obama or Bill Clinton, or even John McCain.

But now because we are unfortunately stuck with Harris, we democrats have to gaslight ourselves and others into thinking that these populist word salads are acceptable. A shame.


I love HRC but actually that level of policy depth and explanation did not end up appealing to the American people. same with Elizabeth Warren.

Very few people can break complex topics down in an understandable, appealing way like Obama. He's a once in a generation political player. That's not the norm or the bar.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton was so much more competent than Harris. And compare Harris with Obama or Bill Clinton, or even John McCain.

But now because we are unfortunately stuck with Harris, we democrats have to gaslight ourselves and others into thinking that these populist word salads are acceptable. A shame.



And Romney too. It wasn't that long ago that there was an expectation that presidential candidates would generally be informed, competent, and decent human beings.

Now we have Donald Trump, an abomination. And due to the colossal arrogance of Joe Biden and his family - Jill and Hunter - we are in the strange situation where mediocrity gets to fall upwards. Democrats have a lot of talent, but none of them can run for president because of what the Bidens did. Instead, we have two months of fingers-crossed Harris can maintain some basic coherence when speaking without a teleprompter. And in the meantime we all need to pretend she's some awesome, historic candidate that will lead America out of the wilderness.

It's a farce. Even children recognize there are moments in a game when you need a do-over.


+1000000. Thanks but no thanks for putting us in this position Joe.
Anonymous
If Tim Walz grammar isnt always correct, should he be one heart beat away?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton was so much more competent than Harris. And compare Harris with Obama or Bill Clinton, or even John McCain.

But now because we are unfortunately stuck with Harris, we democrats have to gaslight ourselves and others into thinking that these populist word salads are acceptable. A shame.



And Romney too. It wasn't that long ago that there was an expectation that presidential candidates would generally be informed, competent, and decent human beings.

Now we have Donald Trump, an abomination. And due to the colossal arrogance of Joe Biden and his family - Jill and Hunter - we are in the strange situation where mediocrity gets to fall upwards. Democrats have a lot of talent, but none of them can run for president because of what the Bidens did. Instead, we have two months of fingers-crossed Harris can maintain some basic coherence when speaking without a teleprompter. And in the meantime we all need to pretend she's some awesome, historic candidate that will lead America out of the wilderness.

It's a farce. Even children recognize there are moments in a game when you need a do-over.


Racist white woman alert. Reminds me when the Clintons reminisced about the good ol’ days when Obama wouldn’t have been bringing them coffee.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Watch the energy view and it's entirety. Was it a hard hitting expose no, it was never supposed to be, but at least her answers were coherent and on topic, which is more than I can say for his deranged press conferences. I will never understand why he continues to get a pass talking about Hannibal lecter for 90 minutes but a Democratic candidate who is concise and answers questions is somehow not looking presidential?


Let's see the unedited interview or better yet a live interview one on one with a reporter.


Sure and let’s see Trump debate with his mic on since his people are so afraid of what he’s going to say when it’s not his turn.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dana Bash: "You've been VP for 3 and a half years. Why didn't you do this?"

Kamala: "We brought inflation down"

She's a walking Trump ad.


+1 Correct. Still cannot believe these are our choices. For me this comes down to the economy/business acumen, the border, and past performance on the world stage. Harris/Walz seem like deer in headlights.


Really?

Inflation is back down and Kroger and Walmat have admitted to their price gouging. Prices are still he, she has outlined her plans to address it. How are tariffs and exporting migrant workers going to keep prices down?

Trump killed the border bill that would deal with the pressing issues. Harris has said she would sign it. Has Trump? Meanwhile, border crossings are down to 2019 levels.

Performance on world stage: no one laughs at Biden/Harris the way they literally were at Trump. NATO has expanded and the US is no longer kowtowing to Putin and Xi. I am not sure why or how joining the ranks of authoritarian countries is good for our economy or democracy writ large.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?



Because it is a money making operation and aren't giving freeloaders a pass.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

Somebody without cable can still pay for CNN as part of various streaming packages. They are just trying to make some money, that's all.


So the American people have to pay CNN or a cable company to listen to the D pres candidate interview?


Any interview, same with Newsmax or Fox.
Anonymous

A woman of color will lead the free world.

Some cannot accept it. But they are tired, they don’t like spice and they need to rest.
Anonymous
Kamala’s CNN interview highlighted what we’ve known all along—no answers, no plan, no hope.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m glad Kamala refused to dignify Trump’s bigotry and idiocy with a response.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/29/us/harris-trump-election

Harris brushes aside a question about Trump questioning her race, refusing to be drawn in.


“Same old tired playbook, next question please,” Harris said.

“That’s it?” Bash asked, to which Harris concluded, “That’s it.”


That was a classy response and a boss move. She doesn't need to get mired in his racist traps (like Obama did with Trump's birther nonsense).


Serious question - what has the Biden-Harris administration done for the Black community?


Black unemployment is at all time lows.
Money invested in HCBU's is at record levels.
Black mortality is down.
Investing in neonatal and other conditions helps all children.
Insulin prices down, huge for the black community.

Specifically.


Anti-lynching bill
$35 Cap to insulin
$16 billion to HBCU’s
4,781 loans to Black-owned businesses in Fiscal Year 2023 equating to $1.45 billion
Ketanji brown Jackson appointed to SCOTUS

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: