WJ/BCC Fight - No racism please!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

You remind me of my SIL who just loves to dig her heels in, even when she’s wrong.
She’s an idiot, too.

I wasn’t wrong I said wait for a police investigation.

You sound like my MIL when I say the sky is blue she says not it’s not it’s blue and then I say yea I said it was blue.

So you’re not the one who kept insisting it wasn’t assault, it was a fight, and that’s perfectly legal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

You remind me of my SIL who just loves to dig her heels in, even when she’s wrong.
She’s an idiot, too.

I wasn’t wrong I said wait for a police investigation.

You sound like my MIL when I say the sky is blue she says not it’s not it’s blue and then I say yea I said it was blue.

So you’re not the one who kept insisting it wasn’t assault, it was a fight, and that’s perfectly legal?

No I said we need to wait for a investigation to determine if it was assault which is a criminal offense or a fight which is legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

You are really something else. The kids were already charged with assault! Including one as an adult. We KNOW what the police investigation found - that it was a crime. Now the judge/jury will decide on guilt or innocence.

That’s exactly what I said.

Now the lawyers will plea it down and they might get tried or it will be settled out of court.

No, that is not exactly what you said. You said “the police will decide.” The police have already done their part and decided it was a criminal assault.

I guess your next line of argument will be “but the jury could decide it was just a fight! we don’t know the facts!”

What I said on 9/05 the 1st post I posted was

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

So no they had not done an investigation… all I said (and everybody freaked out) was you need to wait for the police investigation and not listen to hearsay … like the kid was from Suitland and the girl has an ankle bracelet.

I said let the police investigate .

Now the lawyers get involved and charges get plead down, go away and/or charges are changed from adult to juvenile… possibly.

If they are charging the kids with assault, they have done an investigation and decided it was…assault.

Yes the police have decided there is probable cause to arrest for assault.

Then lawyers get involved and decide if the evidence will stand up in court.

Often they plea it down to avoid court or the States Attorney changes the charges due to evidence.

Arrest and charge are different.

Police arrest, states attorney charge, judges (or jury) convict and set the punishment.

Often it never sees a judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

You remind me of my SIL who just loves to dig her heels in, even when she’s wrong.
She’s an idiot, too.

I wasn’t wrong I said wait for a police investigation.

You sound like my MIL when I say the sky is blue she says not it’s not it’s blue and then I say yea I said it was blue.

So you’re not the one who kept insisting it wasn’t assault, it was a fight, and that’s perfectly legal?

No I said we need to wait for an investigation to determine if it was assault which is a criminal offense or a fight which is legal.

So you’re not Loony McLoonypants. Sorry.
Where is he? The one who said that it was just a fight, sorry your kid lost, fighting is legal, there was no assault. Think he’ll come back?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question - will these kids be allowed back at BCC if they are convicted?

Question - will these kids be allowed back at BCC if they are convicted?

Interesting question…
What happens with an adult convicted of an assault? Don’t some return to the work they were doing before the conviction?

Some people of course can and should not be able to because of serious ethical violations that relate to their profession. But many, many return. Look at sports, entertainment, politics etc.




No, they are on a 10 day suspension now and as I understand it, expulsion proceedings are ongoing. I hope those are expedited.

Thanks to the Montgomery County Police for making the arrests. I find it hard to believe only ONE student reported the incident to police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question - will these kids be allowed back at BCC if they are convicted?

Question - will these kids be allowed back at BCC if they are convicted?

Interesting question…
What happens with an adult convicted of an assault? Don’t some return to the work they were doing before the conviction?

Some people of course can and should not be able to because of serious ethical violations that relate to their profession. But many, many return. Look at sports, entertainment, politics etc.

No, they are on a 10 day suspension now and as I understand it, expulsion proceedings are ongoing. I hope those are expedited.

Thanks to the Montgomery County Police for making the arrests. I find it hard to believe only ONE student reported the incident to police.

The rumor was that the girl who was being beaten was a bcc student misidentified as wj. If she presses charges and goes back to school with Braids McAnkle bracelet's friends she would probably fear for her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

You remind me of my SIL who just loves to dig her heels in, even when she’s wrong.
She’s an idiot, too.

I wasn’t wrong I said wait for a police investigation.

You sound like my MIL when I say the sky is blue she says not it’s not it’s blue and then I say yea I said it was blue.

So you’re not the one who kept insisting it wasn’t assault, it was a fight, and that’s perfectly legal?

No I said we need to wait for an investigation to determine if it was assault which is a criminal offense or a fight which is legal.

So you’re not Loony McLoonypants. Sorry.
Where is he? The one who said that it was just a fight, sorry your kid lost, fighting is legal, there was no assault. Think he’ll come back?

Ges bailing his kid out. He'll be back later

[Anonymous]

Boom goes the dynamite!

"16-year-old Kharon Crosby of Bethesda, is facing charges as an adult, including armed robbery and second-degree assault. Additionally, two other teenagers, aged 15 and 16, have been charged as juveniles with robbery and second-degree assault offenses. Two 15-year-olds face first-degree-assault charges."

[Anonymous]

Where does the armed part come in? Was there a weapon? Is this the child who took the sneakers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where does the armed part come in? Was there a weapon? Is this the child who took the sneakers?

As mentioned on the Twitter thread, and earlier parent reports, there was either a gun or a threat of a gun

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bravo to the police for the 5 arrests and keeping the investigation open. And to the parents for reporting it.

Some credit to MCPS as well for working with police. No doubt MCPS would have stonewalled if the video hadn’t been made public, but they still deserve a little credit even though what they did was obviously the right thing to do.

Sorry. All the credit goes to the police. I wish they released all names so I could make sure my kids stay far away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bravo to the police for the 5 arrests and keeping the investigation open. And to the parents for reporting it.

Some credit to MCPS as well for working with police. No doubt MCPS would have stonewalled if the video hadn’t been made public, but they still deserve a little credit even though what they did was obviously the right thing to do.

Come on, pp. You can set your sights higher than this.
Those kids should have been sent away to a school equipped to handle them long before the incident.
Monifa should not have condescendingly called it a teachable moment and no one should have callednthe ambush of innocent school children a "fight" and tried to imply it had anything to do with a sporting event.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

You remind me of my SIL who just loves to dig her heels in, even when she’s wrong.
She’s an idiot, too.

I wasn’t wrong I said wait for a police investigation.

You sound like my MIL when I say the sky is blue she says not it’s not it’s blue and then I say yea I said it was blue.

So you’re not the one who kept insisting it wasn’t assault, it was a fight, and that’s perfectly legal?

No I said we need to wait for an investigation to determine if it was assault which is a criminal offense or a fight which is legal.

So you’re not Loony McLoonypants. Sorry.
Where is he? The one who said that it was just a fight, sorry your kid lost, fighting is legal, there was no assault. Think he’ll come back?

It’s the same poster. They’re just stupid/lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

They charged him with ROBBERY and assault. This was NOT a fight. He had on a ski mask. THIS WAS INTENTIONAL.

Are you dumb? Just shut up and admit you were talking out of your backside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm…teens arrested for ASSAULT. Would love to hear what Loony McLoony “it’s was just a fight” poster has to say now.

Where was I wrong?

A WJ parent took their kid to the police station and reported it as an assault.

Police will need to do an investigation to determine if it was an assault or a fight.

You will need to wait for facts.

A police report is not facts, it is a report written when people are interviewed. People can lie in the interview.
A police investigation is usually based on facts (though something they are wrong too).

Kid comes home beaten up and he told his parents, "I was assaulted", it might be the truth or he lied because he didn't want to admit he was in a fight (and lost).

They charged him with ROBBERY and assault. This was NOT a fight. He had on a ski mask. THIS WAS INTENTIONAL.

Are you dumb? Just shut up and admit you were talking out of your backside.

And we only know that AFTER a police investigation.