At my undergrad those invites for a number of professors went to really high performing students who had taken a number of classes with that professor. Professor decided who to invite. Never less that 8-12 other students. I have no savvy at stuff like this. Invite came because of work. Anyone in that situation got an invite. Also went on a school summer project to a dig in the Middle East that was run by school. Professor's family was there. After that -- senior year -- went to their house a fair amount. Now my girlfriend was invited repeatedly to dinner with a professor that I think would have been one on one. He had a rep. She stayed away. |
Why? Those professors will be making connections for students for decades to come. Mentoring is an important part of a professor’s job. You might not like it, but there it is. Students need mentors, they need connections, they need relationships to thrive and be successful down the road. You should support MORE mentoring/prof dinners/coffee opportunities, not fewer. And yes, the best students are going to get the best opportunities. Professors put their own reputations on the line when recommending students. Teach your kids how life works instead of trying to readjust it to the even things out for underperformers. |
It may depend on college. But this is actively promoted at many. Meaning professors are encouraged to do this. Develop connections outside of classroom. Be mentors. Always in groups. Not sure who it is not fair to. People seem to think there is an impact on grades that I do not think is there. This is about mentorship. Not everyone can be included the same way some seminar courses are only 12 students. Is that unfair to the rest? You make your own path. These are not exclusive based on any criteria other than maybe good students. |
Yes. another STEM field. I find this thread odd. Everyone is invited - grad students, post docs, and even undergrad kids doing research. |
Oh, really? What happened? Link if you have one. |
| In grad school, yes. But it was a professor inviting a class to their house for a social gathering, not, say, having a Christmas party for all their friends and inviting a couple students to attend. The former was fairly common. The latter would seem inappropriate. |
| I teach grad students and there were several that were in and out of my house. I have hired them as babysitters, taken them to lunch, had the research team over for breakfast, had them house sit and dog sit, had large groups over for spaghetti dinners,movie nights, etc.in retrospect, I am realizing that I was not as inclusive as I could have been. Realizing that I never invited a POC or a guy to babysit, never asked a POC to house sit. I think we all are more prejudiced and discriminatory than we want to see and these occasions do serve the purpose of shutting people out, intentionally or unintentionally. When I was I. Grad school the mostly male professors played squash, basketball and went running but only with the male students. There needs to be a way to shut down this kind of exclusive back channel stuff in favor of equal access. |
| I went to Duke as an undergrad and probably was invited to dinner at a professor’s house every semester? It was really common - I majored in one of the humanities. My favorite was an emeritus professor who was a WWII vet (a hero as I now understand it) and he was so charming and delightful and fun. To this day it was one of the nicest dinners I’ve ever attended. Maybe the landscape is different now, but being invited to someone’s home for a meal that’s not from a dining hall when you’re homesick is one of the nicest experiences a kid can have in college! |
Most certainly.
|
| SLAC yes. We would go in groups. |
Speak for yourself. We have had POC and male babysitters, more than white females. We have boys, though, and they love male babysitters who are “cool” older boys. And our Thanksgivings are a good mix. Anyway, I doubt anyone is unaware of the potential issues these days, and hopefully they are making an effort to be inclusive. We need more mentoring of the disadvantaged, not shutting down mentoring. That is cutting off your nose to spite your face. |
This. Its why its so importnat that the school is a good fit and not just the highest ranking etc. When it isn't all this could be missing from the college experience. |
It's not 'favorites' - it's the students that have a closer relationship with the Professor (they were a research assistant, TA, etc.) These are students that sought out the Professor's additional time and attention and thus receive additional mentoring and access. Totally normal. |
|
Yes, I took a number of courses with a professor who helped me get one of my papers published in an academic journal. I and a few other high performing students were invited to cocktail parties at her house senior year.
In law school I had some professors who would do invite the whole class parties. One was a fancy fully catered Christmas event. Another did a late spring wine and cheese thing outside on his large property on the water. As a student I really enjoyed getting to know my professors. And like a PP said, life is about relationships. FWIW I was the first in my family to graduate college. Daddy couldn’t make a phone call for me and get me the right connections. I had to network and get comfortable being social all on my own account (even though I can be shy in groups). It’s a skill like anything else. |
You are not GRADED in STEM graduate school. Yes, there are a few classes at first, and they come with grades, but graduate students are 'graded' based on their research potential and output. This requires a lot of close interaction with their advisors, and yes, it is normal and fine to develop a personal relationship with your grad school advisor (it often lasts decades beyond grad school - I still hang out with my advisor at conferences decades after I graduated). |