No, “everyone does” NOT share in the blame. |
Stop both sides-ing this. It is profoundly ignorant, not to mention entirely detached from reality, to compare one side violently interceding in our democracy's foundation - the peaceful transfer of power - with the other side calling them mean, if well-deserved, names. Holy crap. |
+1 It is beyond odious and actually kind of poisonous to keep both sides-ing this. When Barack Obama was inaugurated, Mitch said he was going to stop up everything to guarantee that Obama was a one-term president. He allegedly threatened to do the same to Biden’s agenda - stopping covid, getting covid relief to people losing everything, addressing climate change - if the trial wasn’t finished immediately. He knows Trump is guilty, he SAID Trump is guilty. Seriously. Stop pretending that Democrats naming the problem is the problem. |
Both sides have tried to intercede in our democracy. Do you not remember over the summer the thousands of Liberals attacking the White House calling for Trump’s head. But that is not the point at all. Acting like the insurrection is all on Trump when literally both sides had a chance to calm the tension. As I asked in my first post, why did both parties not come out and hold public, bipartisan hearings and investigations into the election process. This isn’t to say I think the election was at all interfered with (it wasn’t), but it is of vital importance that both sides involved trust the election system, and if a large number of the opposing side believe there may have been electoral improprieties, then you say, ‘we believe the election was fair and unbiased, but because we care about our elections we believe it is vital to our democracy we investigate these claims in an open and bipartisan manner.’ Instead, as I said, we just called anyone with any questions a ‘q-anon’ supporter and just increased the tension. |
No, I don't remember "thousands of Liberals attacking the White House" over the summer, because it didn't happen. I guess it's easy to come to the conclusion that both sides are to blame when you're living in a fantasy world. Both parties did not come out and hold public bipartisan hearings on election fraud because none existed. But, that didn't stop the Trump campaign and surrogates from pretending that there was. As is the case in healthy democracies, these issues were litigated in front of judges - an open and nonpartisan process, mind you - and thankfully, the courts' decisions are there fore all to read! If anybody has any questions about the integrity of the elections after 60+ court cases affirming the results, then they probably are a QAnon cultist. |
Your post reads like Russian propaganda. I suggest you get off of social media. |
A bipartisan committee to investigate fraud claims? Are you forgetting about the 60+ court cases that judges (many trump appointees) tossed?
Republicans all over the country, at all levels of government, every single Secretary of State, has agreed that Biden won a fair, secure election. Go to bed. |
Most of those 60 cases were thrown out, very different then affirming the result. And, as I said, I am a democrat and I 100% believe Biden won in a fair election. Many other Americans, however, clearly believe there is reasonable doubt in the election, so for the sake of our election integrity it would have been good to be very open and receptive and offered a bipartisan, open investigation in order to show that the election was won fairly and squarely so Biden could enter the presidency with the support and acceptance of the whole country, not just half. |
If having 60 cases thrown out didn't convince them, a bipartisan commission won't. In fact, there was one on voting fraud at the beginning of the Trump term, and the fact they found nothing didnt' change their minds then. They are snowflakes who cannot believe they lost. They are children. |
One of the parties, the one led by Mitch McConnell, sat and watched 400,000 people die and the economy crumble without lifting a finger to help for ten months. What relief is he going to be “happy to support”? |
Because their cult leader has lied to them. There is no hope for them. And there is nothing reasonable about it. |
Also, if PP wanted Congress to investigate, why isn’t she asking why Mitch didn’t convene a panel in the Senate. Remember, the GOP had the majority in the Senate until Jan 2021. Clearly, they saw no need to investigate the claims of fraud. |
The Senate voted that they had the authority to try the former president. That's actually the constitutional way to decide whether they had jurisdiction. They have the sole power over this. If he had another opinion, that's fine but he doesn't decide that issue. The Senate itself does. |
I have noticed how McConnell still seems to hold all the power even though he is no longer majority leader. Why is that so? Are democrats spineless or is there something in the rules of the Senate that I’m not understanding? Honest question. |
I wish we lived in a world where that was even a possibility, but there are precious few Congressional Republicans who would participate in such an exercise in good faith. Trump supporters wouldn’t trust the few who would be honest and present the facts. If someone like Romney says it was all on the up and up, Trump supporters wouldn’t believe it. If we used somebody like Cruz or Graham, they’d lie about what was found. What you suggest cannot be done with today’s Republican Party. |