The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8357249/Kate-Middleton-feels-exhausted-trapped-enormous-workload-Megxit.html

. Too bad so sad, they want Meghan and Harry to pick up their slack like always. Now they can’t and have to “work”more.

I really don’t think they have any right to complain. They’re sitting at home with nannies and doing Zoom interviews 3X a month?

Like ‘overworked’? CEO?

OMG you guys are so gullible. Kate and her friends don’t leak to any papers. Thus has Meghan’s PR firm Sunshine Sachs fingerprints all over it.

Huh? One of Kate’s good friends from St. Andrews is the editor in chief at Tatler. Unless you mean her friends don’t leak to papers because they already work there?

They are not good friends. He was not invited to her wedding. They are acquaintances.

[Anonymous]

Richard Palmer Royal reporter:

https://mobile.twitter.com/RoyalReporter/status/1265500395364892672


A Kensington Palace spokeswoman says: “This story contains a swathe of inaccuracies and false misrepresentations which were not put to Kensington Palace prior to publication.”


So the issue is not that the palace knew about the Tatler story, it’s that the story the palace saw before publication is not the one ultimately included in July/August Tatler issue.

Also, the article would have needed direct input from Kate and William’s inner circle. These REAL friends (not acquaintance Tatler Editor-in-Chief) notoriously do not talk to media about the Cambridges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8357249/Kate-Middleton-feels-exhausted-trapped-enormous-workload-Megxit.html

. Too bad so sad, they want Meghan and Harry to pick up their slack like always. Now they can’t and have to “work”more.

I really don’t think they have any right to complain. They’re sitting at home with nannies and doing Zoom interviews 3X a month?

Like ‘overworked’? CEO?

OMG you guys are so gullible. Kate and her friends don’t leak to any papers. Thus has Meghan’s PR firm Sunshine Sachs fingerprints all over it.

Huh? One of Kate’s good friends from St. Andrews is the editor in chief at Tatler. Unless you mean her friends don’t leak to papers because they already work there?

They are not good friends. He was not invited to her wedding. They are acquaintances.

They’ve been on vacation together twice. You must have very close acquaintances!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Richard Palmer Royal reporter:

https://mobile.twitter.com/RoyalReporter/status/1265500395364892672


A Kensington Palace spokeswoman says: “This story contains a swathe of inaccuracies and false misrepresentations which were not put to Kensington Palace prior to publication.”


So the issue is not that the palace knew about the Tatler story, it’s that the story the palace saw before publication is not the one ultimately included in July/August Tatler issue.

Also, the article would have needed direct input from Kate and William’s inner circle. These REAL friends (not acquaintance Tatler Editor-in-Chief) notoriously do not talk to media about the Cambridges.

Sure, Jan. First it was Meghan was the source. Now it’s there’s no source because they don’t have editorial control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8357249/Kate-Middleton-feels-exhausted-trapped-enormous-workload-Megxit.html

. Too bad so sad, they want Meghan and Harry to pick up their slack like always. Now they can’t and have to “work”more.

I really don’t think they have any right to complain. They’re sitting at home with nannies and doing Zoom interviews 3X a month?

Like ‘overworked’? CEO?

OMG you guys are so gullible. Kate and her friends don’t leak to any papers. Thus has Meghan’s PR firm Sunshine Sachs fingerprints all over it.

Huh? One of Kate’s good friends from St. Andrews is the editor in chief at Tatler. Unless you mean her friends don’t leak to papers because they already work there?

They are not good friends. He was not invited to her wedding. They are acquaintances.

They’ve been on vacation together twice. You must have very close acquaintances!

Source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Richard Palmer Royal reporter:

https://mobile.twitter.com/RoyalReporter/status/1265500395364892672


A Kensington Palace spokeswoman says: “This story contains a swathe of inaccuracies and false misrepresentations which were not put to Kensington Palace prior to publication.”


So the issue is not that the palace knew about the Tatler story, it’s that the story the palace saw before publication is not the one ultimately included in July/August Tatler issue.

Also, the article would have needed direct input from Kate and William’s inner circle. These REAL friends (not acquaintance Tatler Editor-in-Chief) notoriously do not talk to media about the Cambridges.

Sure, Jan. First it was Meghan was the source. Now it’s there’s no source because they don’t have editorial control.

???? That is exactly what I’m saying. None of Kate or William’s inner circle would talk to Tatler. Meghan’s PR firm is source for this article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://play.acast.com/s/happymumhappybaby/82fa9582-552f-49b6-9290-ff51b7b7b872

It was so cool to hear her talk about her childhood.

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8357249/Kate-Middleton-feels-exhausted-trapped-enormous-workload-Megxit.html

. Too bad so sad, they want Meghan and Harry to pick up their slack like always. Now they can’t and have to “work”more.

I really don’t think they have any right to complain. They’re sitting at home with nannies and doing Zoom interviews 3X a month?

Like ‘overworked’? CEO?

OMG you guys are so gullible. Kate and her friends don’t leak to any papers. Thus has Meghan’s PR firm Sunshine Sachs fingerprints all over it.

Huh? One of Kate’s good friends from St. Andrews is the editor in chief at Tatler. Unless you mean her friends don’t leak to papers because they already work there?

They are not good friends. He was not invited to her wedding. They are acquaintances.

They’ve been on vacation together twice. You must have very close acquaintances!

Source?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/weekend/meet-the-son-of-an-anglican-archdeacon-who-has-holidayed-with-kate-middleton-is-obsessed-with-meghan-markle-and-has-just-been-appointed-editor-of-tatler-36628454.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Richard Palmer Royal reporter:

https://mobile.twitter.com/RoyalReporter/status/1265500395364892672


A Kensington Palace spokeswoman says: “This story contains a swathe of inaccuracies and false misrepresentations which were not put to Kensington Palace prior to publication.”


So the issue is not that the palace knew about the Tatler story, it’s that the story the palace saw before publication is not the one ultimately included in July/August Tatler issue.

Also, the article would have needed direct input from Kate and William’s inner circle. These REAL friends (not acquaintance Tatler Editor-in-Chief) notoriously do not talk to media about the Cambridges.

Sure, Jan. First it was Meghan was the source. Now it’s there’s no source because they don’t have editorial control.

???? That is exactly what I’m saying. None of Kate or William’s inner circle would talk to Tatler. Meghan’s PR firm is source for this article.

all of meghan’s PR has always been in us publications. Not sure why she would suddenly decide to be a source for a British magazine that’s known for aristo gossip and the piece is very unflattering for her and Harry as well as it repeatedly calls them selfish. And also Tatler has been very critical of Meghan: https://www.tatler.com/article/meghan-markle-diva-behaviour-on-photo-shoot

If you actually believe Meghan is behind all of this then I truly think she would make an excellent Bond villain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8357249/Kate-Middleton-feels-exhausted-trapped-enormous-workload-Megxit.html

. Too bad so sad, they want Meghan and Harry to pick up their slack like always. Now they can’t and have to “work”more.

I really don’t think they have any right to complain. They’re sitting at home with nannies and doing Zoom interviews 3X a month?

Like ‘overworked’? CEO?

OMG you guys are so gullible. Kate and her friends don’t leak to any papers. Thus has Meghan’s PR firm Sunshine Sachs fingerprints all over it.

Huh? One of Kate’s good friends from St. Andrews is the editor in chief at Tatler. Unless you mean her friends don’t leak to papers because they already work there?

They are not good friends. He was not invited to her wedding. They are acquaintances.

They’ve been on vacation together twice. You must have very close acquaintances!

Source?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/weekend/meet-the-son-of-an-anglican-archdeacon-who-has-holidayed-with-kate-middleton-is-obsessed-with-meghan-markle-and-has-just-been-appointed-editor-of-tatler-36628454.html

This article says they went on group friend vacations during university. That was a looooong time ago. He wasn’t close enough to be invited to the Cambridges’ wedding. Even the title says this guy is “obsessed with Meghan Markle.”

[Anonymous]

Meghan’s PR definitely still floods U.K. tabloids. They still have almost daily articles in Daily Mail. Really bizarre to do that, but they are not going away.

[Anonymous]

I have no idea why but the claws are coming out for the Middletons and even William. Another major reporter being pissy. Have to wonder if W+K refused to do something they wanted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea why but the claws are coming out for the Middletons and even William. Another major reporter being pissy. Have to wonder if W+K refused to do something they wanted?

Is this video the source of that remark reported back when they were doing their Ireland tour? I had heard the quote about spreading coronavirus, but I hadn't heard the whole thing. Even worse. What a jerk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea why but the claws are coming out for the Middletons and even William. Another major reporter being pissy. Have to wonder if W+K refused to do something they wanted?

Is this video the source of that remark reported back when they were doing their Ireland tour? I had heard the quote about spreading coronavirus, but I hadn't heard the whole thing. Even worse. What a jerk.

Yes, it is. Of course the palace covered it up. Then Prince Charles was COVID-19 positive as well. Just a mess.

[Anonymous]

No comment.