Diana's niece marrying a 60-year-old

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be soooo beautiful but to f$ck that old decrepit thing!! LOL! Truly, God equalizes everything. Does not matter that she is aristocracy - she is pretty much a commodity with a price. Some rich old lewd man can get her to warm his bed after flashing money at her. How did she get soooooo messed up?

I think it is the British aristocracy way. I believe he has children older than Kitty. It is weird.

Not aristocracy
Diana was, her father the Earl is. Her claim to fame is a famous cousin.
The Earl had his wife and kids shipped to a far away troubled African country. She was not raised in Brittish high society.

As for her father, the Earl. According to Brittish law the oldest son is heir apparent and other siblings, including wife, ex-wives, get nothing

Try to be a little less ill-informed.

The Earl moved with his family to South Africa during the height of the Wales separation wars.

He came back to the UK after two years as he divorced Kitty’s mother - the former Countess.

So yes - she is aristocracy. She was born to it and it’s in her bloodline.

Doesn’t mean the blue bloods don’t still have disturbing social norms.

[Anonymous]

The groom to be has 3 adult kids. Let’s hope they’re not too similar in age to Kitty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The groom to be has 3 adult kids. Let’s hope they’re not too similar in age to Kitty.

They’re older than her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me Diana was far prettier than Kate and Meghan. I think Kate and Meghan are averagely attractive but that Diana was well above average. But that just my personal view.

I also think Diana was the most beautiful, but Meghan comes in at a close second. Kate is flat out ugly.

Diana’s charisma was off the charts. Meghan’s beauty is warm and radiant. Imagine if we had seen Diana truly happy - she’d have been a supernova.

Kate is a pretty, sweet looking woman. But she lacks charm, and is a bit bland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me Diana was far prettier than Kate and Meghan. I think Kate and Meghan are averagely attractive but that Diana was well above average. But that just my personal view.

I also think Diana was the most beautiful, but Meghan comes in at a close second. Kate is flat out ugly.

Diana’s charisma was off the charts. Meghan’s beauty is warm and radiant. Imagine if we had seen Diana truly happy - she’d have been a supernova.

Kate is a pretty, sweet looking woman. But she lacks charm, and is a bit bland.

Beauty is subjective. I think all the strong opinions on this thread proves that (I think Kate is beautiful.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG he's actually OLDER THAN HER FATHER.

O.O

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7851725/PICTURED-Lady-Kitty-Spencer-29-displayed-diamond-band-ring-finger-two-months-ago.html

She's honestly very average looking in these photos, and her vacation shots display less-than-model proportions. Her catwalk experience must have been a long time ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be soooo beautiful but to f$ck that old decrepit thing!! LOL! Truly, God equalizes everything. Does not matter that she is aristocracy - she is pretty much a commodity with a price. Some rich old lewd man can get her to warm his bed after flashing money at her. How did she get soooooo messed up?

I think it is the British aristocracy way. I believe he has children older than Kitty. It is weird.

Honestly I think so many of them grow up house poor - those estates take millions to manage each year now that it’s no longer the 1500s and you can’t pay servants with just a cot and warm meal.

All their money goes to the game wardens, landscapers, household staff, and keeping up ‘appearances’. Not to mention it’s money handed down over generations so there’s no replenishing it.

The girl who grew up in the Hogwarts castle talked about climbing over 100 steps every night to get up her bed! After she married a wealthy American her homes had elevators.

Most surviving great estates in Britain had to become quasi-museums or agricultural concerns to survive.

As for morals of British aristocracy, the less said of them, the better.

[Anonymous]

She clearly has daddy issues, along with possible money issues.

Diana had etheral beauty with charisma and presence that both Kate and Megan lack. Kate and Megan are both pretty but nothing extraordinary. I know many prettier women around town.

[Anonymous]

[img] https://www.newidea.com.au/media/70794/3.jpg[img]

Not embedding for some reason but see link. I’m sorry, Di was definitely graceful but that’s about it. She was literally an inch away from being ugly. And I am not normally a harsh critic of female beauty. I literally try to see there beauty in most people.

This is probably the prettiest photo I can find of her after looking through dozens.
https://image.insider.com/5d95ded690f8021db95ce4d9?width=1100&format=jpeg&auto=webp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img] https://www.newidea.com.au/media/70794/3.jpg[img]

Not embedding for some reason but see link. I’m sorry, Di was definitely graceful but that’s about it. She was literally an inch away from being ugly. And I am not normally a harsh critic of female beauty. I literally try to see there beauty in most people.

This is probably the prettiest photo I can find of her after looking through dozens.
https://image.insider.com/5d95ded690f8021db95ce4d9?width=1100&format=jpeg&auto=webp

Stunningly gorgeous picture of Diana.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img] https://www.newidea.com.au/media/70794/3.jpg[img]

Not embedding for some reason but see link. I’m sorry, Di was definitely graceful but that’s about it. She was literally an inch away from being ugly. And I am not normally a harsh critic of female beauty. I literally try to see there beauty in most people.

This is probably the prettiest photo I can find of her after looking through dozens.
https://image.insider.com/5d95ded690f8021db95ce4d9?width=1100&format=jpeg&auto=webp

Stunningly gorgeous picture of Diana.

Stunning? How about a 7 out of 10 and that’s of an airbrushed touched your photo of her. Every day photos of her show her as a 5, 6 tops. I’m convinced anyone that would use the word stunning has similar features as Diana. There was nothing stunning about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is very beautiful. Diana, OTOH, was not a great beauty. I’ve never understood it when people say she was. Not trying to incite violence, but she was barely a 5. Both Kate and Meghan are far prettier than Diana ever was.

Agree. Very much agree.

+1

Diana looked best after the divorce/when she was dating Dodi. She was fit and happy and the 90s hair was much more flattering on her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be soooo beautiful but to f$ck that old decrepit thing!! LOL! Truly, God equalizes everything. Does not matter that she is aristocracy - she is pretty much a commodity with a price. Some rich old lewd man can get her to warm his bed after flashing money at her. How did she get soooooo messed up?

I think it is the British aristocracy way. I believe he has children older than Kitty. It is weird.

Not aristocracy
Diana was, her father the Earl is. Her claim to fame is a famous cousin.
The Earl had his wife and kids shipped to a far away troubled African country. She was not raised in Brittish high society.

As for her father, the Earl. According to Brittish law the oldest son is heir apparent and other siblings, including wife, ex-wives, get nothing

Try to be a little less ill-informed.

The Earl moved with his family to South Africa during the height of the Wales separation wars.

He came back to the UK after two years as he divorced Kitty’s mother - the former Countess.

So yes - she is aristocracy. She was born to it and it’s in her bloodline.

Doesn’t mean the blue bloods don’t still have disturbing social norms.

Perhaps by bloodline
Bloodlines do not count for that much. She didn't grow up in the aristocratic circles and as such is outside the community.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is very beautiful. Diana, OTOH, was not a great beauty. I’ve never understood it when people say she was. Not trying to incite violence, but she was barely a 5. Both Kate and Meghan are far prettier than Diana ever was.

I agree that she was not a great beauty, but this is insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be soooo beautiful but to f$ck that old decrepit thing!! LOL! Truly, God equalizes everything. Does not matter that she is aristocracy - she is pretty much a commodity with a price. Some rich old lewd man can get her to warm his bed after flashing money at her. How did she get soooooo messed up?

I think it is the British aristocracy way. I believe he has children older than Kitty. It is weird.

Not aristocracy
Diana was, her father the Earl is. Her claim to fame is a famous cousin.
The Earl had his wife and kids shipped to a far away troubled African country. She was not raised in Brittish high society.

As for her father, the Earl. According to Brittish law the oldest son is heir apparent and other siblings, including wife, ex-wives, get nothing

Try to be a little less ill-informed.

The Earl moved with his family to South Africa during the height of the Wales separation wars.

He came back to the UK after two years as he divorced Kitty’s mother - the former Countess.

So yes - she is aristocracy. She was born to it and it’s in her bloodline.

Doesn’t mean the blue bloods don’t still have disturbing social norms.

Perhaps by bloodline
Bloodlines do not count for that much. She didn't grow up in the aristocratic circles and as such is outside the community.

Interesting.

Knowing that would happen - why would her father and mother relocate her and all their siblings?