Love Gillenbrand and tulsi Hated the senator from India. |
DP. I have posted this so many times on different threads. As if Trump can take credit for all those things and they aren't the result of so many factors over so many years. And the talk about the deregulation....as if that is good. Oh yay! Industry can pollute our water more easily. How awesome. And so many things on that list that would have happened with or without Trump due to things and policies and people already in place before his tenure. The idiocy of the average American voter would be laughable if it weren't so damaging. |
Harris was Hillary 2.0. Gillenbrand was okay. I like Klobuchar and Gabbard. I don't care for Warren because of the policies she is advocating. It has nothing to do with gender. |
Democrats view Republicans as idiots ........ and Republicans feel the same way about Democrats. |
Weirdo. Just weird. Where are you from? |
NOPE. Not that either. Trump has done almost nothing of substance on the economy, and what his administration has done — a bit of excellent regulatory reform — is unlikely to affect growth dramatically in the short term. Regulatory reform is a good investment, but one with a long timeline for payoff. When you hear someone crediting a president with an economic boom or strong wage growth, ask them in some detail about the actual mechanism they believe to be at work, some plausible chain of causality. You’ll rarely get a satisfying answer. Regulatory reform is a good investment, but one with a long timeline for payoff. Presidents are one small piece of the public-policy picture — and public policy as a whole is only a small part of what shapes and moves a complex modern economy. We tend toward a destructively immature and ahistorical view: The regulatory reforms that made the Internet boom of the Clinton years began decades before; the confluence of terrible policies that created the subprime meltdown and financial crisis of 2008–09 began in the 1930s, with housing and banking reforms and regulatory development occurring under presidents and https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/11/presidents-do-not-control-economies-or-gdp/ |
When the dust settles and the public gets over your revenge gossiping salacious leds, you'll realize you lived during the greatest period of economic growth and tried to end it just before the low unemployment levels require better wages.
Like - how do some of you get dressed in the morning with this low level of intellect? |
Well said. And these are the people who watch nothing but CNN/MSNBC and only read the WaPo and NYT. They are so consumed in their echo chambers that they can’t possibly accept news from another source. |
“ revenge gossiping salacious leds” What are you trying to say? No one here is gossiping. Are you sure you speak English regularly? Bot? Troll? |
Nope. I’m quoting from that liberal rag, the National Review. I read WSJ, Economist, WAPO, and NYT. Don’t really know watch TV. But probably would not watch the Trump propaganda channel, Fox. |
No way to refute what the pro-Trump poster said, eh? |
The "long-list" poster was responding to the question about what Trump has done to deserve a second term. The fact of the matter is that the list is long, and your answer is to tell him maybe he should live in Saudi Arabia? Dang but you liberals can be nasty. |
Perhaps. But I would submit that most Democrats are at least well-meaning people who care about their fellow persons, who want to improve education and health care and provide access to these things to as many Americans as possible, end poverty, promote a clean and healthy environment, promote equality and tolerance. Republicans idiots want to protect their own pocketbooks and worry only about themselves. They talk about family values and Christianity, but they are total hypocrites who don't practice anything they preach. |
People are refuting it. Just because some of those things have happened now does not mean Trump is responsible for those things. In fact, I would say some of the good things happen in spite of Trump, because there are workers in place from before his time that carry out policies that precede him. And, as others have pointed out, the state of the economy is not solely due to a president or his actions, but to many factors, most of which took place before he was in office or just have nothing to do with him at all. And there are things on that list that many of us don't view as positives that would recommend him. Big list does not equal compelling arguments. |
What has Trump done to deserve a second term?
He has ... Given away a us military base to the Russians Proven the Kurds can't trust us Praised white supremacists Overturned military convictions for war crimes Said little about a Saudi gunning down soldiers on a base Earned lots of money by golfing at his resorts Provides entertainment by lying on a daily basis Keeping kids in cages and separating families Is currently trying to make antisemitism happen, after failing to invite enough hate against black people.and hispanics |