Meghan Markle’s Own Father Calls Her a Hypocrite

[Anonymous]

Eh ignore them- my prediction is that they will divorce in 3-4 years or become this generation’s Duke and Duchess of Windsor or York or a sad combination of both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:‘Meghan's best friend, stylist Jessica Mulroney, even called criticism of Meghan's private jet jaunts 'racist'.

But Mr Markle said: 'I don't think it's racist. I think it's a shame that Meghan and Harry say one thing and act another way. Whoever is advising them isn't doing a great job.'’

This is what I’ve been saying all along. She and Harry are not doing things right, especially not letting Mr. Markle even meet his grandson. AndnHarrynshould wake up that she was a poor choice for a wife. A gold digger that knew what she wanted, knew what she was doing, and is trying to live like a spoiled rich celebrity.

Well, if the shoe fits princess ... he is right. Sadly.

what exactly are the Sussexes doing wrong specifically?

What did Harry say about the environment specifically? Exact words? Links to interviews and articles?

What did Meghan say about the environment specifically? Exact words? Links to interviews and articles?

The royals rich, but they aren't celebrities. The tabloids elevated them to that because they write something every single day won't write about anyone else. If they stop writing about the Sussexes, voila, they are off everyone's radar.

As for Archie her father doesn't even associate with his 5 other grand children who live closer to him, but their parents aren't royalty. Their parents are deadbeat, drug addict spouse and child abusers, his 2 other children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

They fly private frequently while preaching about the environment. It’s like if you ate a bloomin onion every week. That wouldn’t be responsible right? Carbon emissions from their recent trip exceed that of the average American’s for 1 year!

[Anonymous]

Thomas Markle, the guy who has been selling news about his daughter, and encouraging his other daughter to do the same, is the last person who should be calling anyone names.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

You've missed the flight-shaming movement in Europe against flying? It hasn't taken off here yet. But it will. Turns out, it's better for the environment for 100 people to drive than for them to take one plane flight. Who knew? (We knew, we just didn't care )

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:‘Meghan's best friend, stylist Jessica Mulroney, even called criticism of Meghan's private jet jaunts 'racist'.

But Mr Markle said: 'I don't think it's racist. I think it's a shame that Meghan and Harry say one thing and act another way. Whoever is advising them isn't doing a great job.'’

This is what I’ve been saying all along. She and Harry are not doing things right, especially not letting Mr. Markle even meet his grandson. AndnHarrynshould wake up that she was a poor choice for a wife. A gold digger that knew what she wanted, knew what she was doing, and is trying to live like a spoiled rich celebrity.

Well, if the shoe fits princess ... he is right. Sadly.

what exactly are the Sussexes doing wrong specifically?

What did Harry say about the environment specifically? Exact words? Links to interviews and articles?

What did Meghan say about the environment specifically? Exact words? Links to interviews and articles?

The royals rich, but they aren't celebrities. The tabloids elevated them to that because they write something every single day won't write about anyone else. If they stop writing about the Sussexes, voila, they are off everyone's radar.

As for Archie her father doesn't even associate with his 5 other grand children who live closer to him, but their parents aren't royalty. Their parents are deadbeat, drug addict spouse and child abusers, his 2 other children.

+100. Here are a few deconstructions of the tabloid headlines that I think are on point:

https://meghanpedia.com/this-week-in-royal-madness-footprints-of-giants-henchmen-and-carbon-emissions/

https://meghanpedia.com/dear-british-tabloids-and-media/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

They fly private frequently while preaching about the environment. It’s like if you ate a bloomin onion every week. That wouldn’t be responsible right? Carbon emissions from their recent trip exceed that of the average American’s for 1 year!

Same as the Obamas buying that huge mansion in an island ....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

They fly private frequently while preaching about the environment. It’s like if you ate a bloomin onion every week. That wouldn’t be responsible right? Carbon emissions from their recent trip exceed that of the average American’s for 1 year!

Same as the Obamas buying that huge mansion in an island ....

Because the Obamas are know for their mansion bashing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

They fly private frequently while preaching about the environment. It’s like if you ate a bloomin onion every week. That wouldn’t be responsible right? Carbon emissions from their recent trip exceed that of the average American’s for 1 year!

Same as the Obamas buying that huge mansion in an island ....

Because the Obamas are know for their mansion bashing?

I guess PP was just using the opportunity to bash every black-adjacent celebrity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

You've missed the flight-shaming movement in Europe against flying? It hasn't taken off here yet. But it will. Turns out, it's better for the environment for 100 people to drive than for them to take one plane flight. Who knew? (We knew, we just didn't care )

When we were in Europe recently, we took trains because we wanted to see the countryside and the cities we visited are close together. The trains were packed with business travelers and vacationers who say they are trying not to fly except for very long distances. The trains are very nice -- every in poor countries like the Czech Republic -- and encourage ground travel. It is much more enjoyable to take a train, too. The problem with the States is its size. I am not sure we will ever be able to do this type of travel efficiently,.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Harry are typical virtue signaling leftists. It’s frankly disgusting how they claim to be advocates for the environment given their lifestyle - they are literally lecturing to people who have much smaller carbon footprints. The carbon credit thing is complete bullshit - it’s like taking a shit in a public pool and then absolving your own guilt by paying poor people not to shit in that same pool.

I love Harry’s ex Cressida Bonas who understands that if you truly want to help the poor - you support their efforts to support themselves (watch Poverty Inc). She would have made a much better princess - too bad she didn’t want that life.

That said - her father shouldn’t be trashing her.

Puh-lease. Just because you advocate for smaller carbon footprints and environmental causes doesn't mean you can't ever do anything that is extravagant. It's about choices. I'm a diabetic and have to maintain a healthy lifestyle. That doesn't mean I can't ever have a Bloomin Onion from Outback or a fruity alcoholic drink.

You've missed the flight-shaming movement in Europe against flying? It hasn't taken off here yet. But it will. Turns out, it's better for the environment for 100 people to drive than for them to take one plane flight. Who knew? (We knew, we just didn't care )

When we were in Europe recently, we took trains because we wanted to see the countryside and the cities we visited are close together. The trains were packed with business travelers and vacationers who say they are trying not to fly except for very long distances. The trains are very nice -- every in poor countries like the Czech Republic -- and encourage ground travel. It is much more enjoyable to take a train, too. The problem with the States is its size. I am not sure we will ever be able to do this type of travel efficiently,.

Europe has good trains but the flight-shaming is a very recent trend. The US has lots of train tracks for freight. We could increase the use of passenger trains easily and could build out our infrastructure more, if we had the will. And in the next couple decades, I wouldn't be surprised if it happens. We're slowly beginning to contemplate changing our cities. Changing our method of long-distance travel is a much easier fix, next to that.

[Anonymous]

Flight shaming in Europe? Any evidence, articles? I find that interesting and wondered why everyone here in US thinks it’s ok to fly so often for travel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Flight shaming in Europe? Any evidence, articles? I find that interesting and wondered why everyone here in US thinks it’s ok to fly so often for travel.

The U.S. is larger than the 26 countries of the European Union combined. Most Europeans are traveling across border country boundaries for short trips, rather like we do with states. But just like a person from Denmark is not driving to southern Italy, most New Yorkers are not driving to Atlanta.



But to answer your question, the anti-flying movement is coming from people like Greta Thunberg.

https://i-d.vice.com/en_us/article/kz4b3a/see-photos-from-greta-thunbergs-first-climate-strike-in-the-us

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-10/greta-thunberg-and-flight-shame-fuel-a-carbon-offset-boom

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are media reports that they are looking for a home in LA in the same gated community as Kim Kardashian and Leo DiCaprio. If they buy a home in LA, will everyone finally admit that she wears the pants in the relationship and desperately wants to be a celebrity rather than a real Royal?

They have no line to the throne. He is a sibling to the future king. If she is happy in LA and that is where they want to go, why not?

What a perfect way to stay OUT OF the limelight!