Robert Foster, GOP governor candidate, denies woman reporter access because of her gender

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple solution:

This dude doesn’t get coverage.

The end

I really think the guy is a rapist to be if he can’t be trusted alone with a woman without trying to have sexual with her.

See..... he hasn't even been alone with her and already the accusations are out there. Lovely.
You liberals don't disappoint.

[Anonymous]

What in Fu$k’s sake is wrong with the GOP? How does any woman hold their nose and vote for these disgusting, backwards, misogynistic men???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple solution:

This dude doesn’t get coverage.

The end

I really think the guy is a rapist to be if he can’t be trusted alone with a woman without trying to have sexual with her.

See..... he hasn't even been alone with her and already the accusations are out there. Lovely.
You liberals don't disappoint.

He is saying he cannot control himself in the presence or a member of the opposite sex. He is unfit for the job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I don't blame him a bit. All it takes is an allegation.
He didn't refuse her access. He told her that a male colleague would need to be present. Nothing at all wrong with that.

In this #MeToo era, one just cannot be too careful. Good for him.

Oh really, just an allegation? Donald is still in the White House with a couple dozen credible allegations, so...

Also, why do you want a compulsory Christian nation? Why are you bent on enforcing biblical baloney rather than expecting men not to rape? That’s what you’re saying, isn’t it? Men can’t be trusted so women should be chaperoned as they had to be in biblical days?

Oh, FFS.
"Compulsory Christian nation?" Who the hell said anything about that.
Let me clarify for you what I am saying.............

He did not want to give any appearance of impropriety. He did not want to have to defend himself against false allegations from his competition. He did not want to have to defend himself from rumors that might be started. It is THAT simple.

You are unhinged.

Oh, FFS indeed.

If a guy doesn’t want to give any appearance of impropriety, don’t treat women different than you treat men. Don’t comment on a woman’s appearance. Don’t imply she’s less of a professional just because she’s in possessor a uterus and a vagina. Don’t caress her. Don’t give hugs. Don’t make gross sex jokes. Don’t sexually harass her. Don’t sexually assault her. See? This is easy, and it’s 100% within a man’s control.

That he needs to have women chaperoned in his presence doesn’t say he’s careful, it suggests he ought to locked up in a sex offender’s unit in prison. He’s admitting he can’t control himself.

If he treated her like a man, you would say he is misogynistic. Men do not have the same privilege as women do. People make comments on a man’s appearance, the way he dresses, you can hug a man without asking, etc, etc. Everything is fair game with a man. In this case, the chaperone is there to protect his reputation. He does not feel comfortable being a lone with this woman. She showed she does not care about how he feels. She wants to force him to comply with her demands. If the genders were reserved I could only image what you would say. She kind of showed she can not be trusted by the way she handled this story.

[Anonymous]

If he treated her like a man, you would say he is misogynistic.

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why the "Pence Rule" is harmful and discriminatory.

It's not like women like to make frivolous claims and undergo the media and public scrutiny.

At first I thought you were being facetious, but sadly I see you’re serious. That you still believe there aren’t women who do exactly that - make frivolous claims - means you’re part of the problem. I don’t blame him one bit. That’s what happens when women see a #metoo moment around every corner.
-a woman

No one would voluntarily put themselves through it unless it was real. Who was the last one to credibly be frivolous?

LOL.
Julie Swetnik. Towanna Brawley, Emma Sulkowicz (Mattress girl) - there are tons of cases.

https://reason.com/2018/10/17/seneca-valley-mean-girls-false-sexual/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/47107/man-falsely-accused-sexual-assault-teen-girl-amanda-prestigiacomo

Just two in a google search. It happens.

There are far more Epsteins out there than false accusations. Law enforcement doesn’t take ANY action against sexual assault

Nobody is disputing this.
How would YOU like to be a victim of false allegations? It just takes one.
And, yes, law enforcement DOES take action. WTH are you talking about?

If you mean taking swabs for a rape kit and letting it sit for years in an evidence closet unprocessed then yes I guess they do take action.

[Anonymous]

Omg. Who are you PP and what crazy sect do you belong to? Good lord.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg. Who are you PP and what crazy sect do you belong to? Good lord.

This is meant for PP who tried to mansplain why this guy can’t trust himself near a young lady.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I don't blame him a bit. All it takes is an allegation.
He didn't refuse her access. He told her that a male colleague would need to be present. Nothing at all wrong with that.

In this #MeToo era, one just cannot be too careful. Good for him.

Oh really, just an allegation? Donald is still in the White House with a couple dozen credible allegations, so...

Also, why do you want a compulsory Christian nation? Why are you bent on enforcing biblical baloney rather than expecting men not to rape? That’s what you’re saying, isn’t it? Men can’t be trusted so women should be chaperoned as they had to be in biblical days?

Oh, FFS.
"Compulsory Christian nation?" Who the hell said anything about that.
Let me clarify for you what I am saying.............

He did not want to give any appearance of impropriety. He did not want to have to defend himself against false allegations from his competition. He did not want to have to defend himself from rumors that might be started. It is THAT simple.

You are unhinged.

Oh, FFS indeed.

If a guy doesn’t want to give any appearance of impropriety, don’t treat women different than you treat men. Don’t comment on a woman’s appearance. Don’t imply she’s less of a professional just because she’s in possessor a uterus and a vagina. Don’t caress her. Don’t give hugs. Don’t make gross sex jokes. Don’t sexually harass her. Don’t sexually assault her. See? This is easy, and it’s 100% within a man’s control.

That he needs to have women chaperoned in his presence doesn’t say he’s careful, it suggests he ought to locked up in a sex offender’s unit in prison. He’s admitting he can’t control himself.

If he treated her like a man, you would say he is misogynistic. Men do not have the same privilege as women do. People make comments on a man’s appearance, the way he dresses, you can hug a man without asking, etc, etc. Everything is fair game with a man. In this case, the chaperone is there to protect his reputation. He does not feel comfortable being a lone with this woman. She showed she does not care about how he feels. She wants to force him to comply with her demands. If the genders were reserved I could only image what you would say. She kind of showed she can not be trusted by the way she handled this story.

/s
Nicely done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What in Fu$k’s sake is wrong with the GOP? How does any woman hold their nose and vote for these disgusting, backwards, misogynistic men???

exactly - that is the appropriate response

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg. Who are you PP and what crazy sect do you belong to? Good lord.

This is meant for PP who tried to mansplain why this guy can’t trust himself near a young lady.

Because men get unsolicited hugs apparently.

Oh lord, it is so hard being a man. I earn more money for the same job and women hug me without asking. I live in fear of being falsely accused of rape, which is why I’m scared to walk down an alley at night even though my friends showed me how to put my keys between my fingers and make a fist to punch those who want to falsely accuse me. I’m never safe.

[Anonymous]

Please. This is 1950s hogwash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please. This is 1950s hogwash.

Again meant for mansplainer not post above which is spot on?

[Anonymous]

Why is this particular candidate so sure he won't be accused of improper conduct with male reporters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I don't blame him a bit. All it takes is an allegation.
He didn't refuse her access. He told her that a male colleague would need to be present. Nothing at all wrong with that.

In this #MeToo era, one just cannot be too careful. Good for him.

A male reporter could do the same thing to him.