which cities will be the next "hot" cities?

[Anonymous]

I think cities in the interior are a safe bet, due to climate change. I definitely wouldn’t be buying in a city near the water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ann Arbor Michigan is a better bet than Detroit

Too small to be a major player

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pittsburgh. Carnegie Mellon graduates are attracting businesses or starting their own. The city has an increasingly youthful vibe. Cost of living is low, and public transport is decent. It is a spot of blue in a sea of red Pennsyltucky.

Pittsburgh is one of the most depressing cities I've ever been too. It's like a valley of hills and dark horizons which is quite the feat considering coal long ago left that area of PA.

I don't get that depressing feeling at all, especially the last couple of years. Were you there when the weather was bad?

I feel about Baltimore the same way you feel about Pittsburgh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at everyone who named dead flyover hellholes that have eye-popping violent crime, double digit BILLIONS in infrastructure time bombs, polluted land, & eye-popping public retiree obligations.

The rich will get richer — already thriving coasts and sun belt are safest bets. Fact is nobody with talent wants to live in a cold flyover dump with high taxes and stupid people.

I get a chuckle imagining someone who thinks of themselves as cosmopolitan writing something ignorant and outdated. Carry on, PP!

+1. This poster comes out of the woodwork of her NOVA shitshack anytime there is a post about “flyover country.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at everyone who named dead flyover hellholes that have eye-popping violent crime, double digit BILLIONS in infrastructure time bombs, polluted land, & eye-popping public retiree obligations.

The rich will get richer — already thriving coasts and sun belt are safest bets. Fact is nobody with talent wants to live in a cold flyover dump with high taxes and stupid people.

Maybe cities like Milwaukee and Detroit should elect Democratic mayors.

Anyone who lumps Milwaukee and Detroit together is an idiot. Milwaukee is actually a really cool city.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ann Arbor Michigan is a better bet than Detroit

Too small to be a major player

I think Ann Arbor is already as "hot" as it could get

[Anonymous]

Reykjavik
Lisbon
San Marino

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Baltimore. I bet my life on it. The lone holdout of east coast cities that remains affordable. Already well-developed in certain areas. In ten years it will be DC circa 2005.

Is all of federal government, all the 3 letter agencies, lobbyists, military industrial complex, contractors, news media moving to Baltimore? B-more is too far gone to save and nobody is dropping 100,000+ high-paying jobs there anytime soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at everyone who named dead flyover hellholes that have eye-popping violent crime, double digit BILLIONS in infrastructure time bombs, polluted land, & eye-popping public retiree obligations.

The rich will get richer — already thriving coasts and sun belt are safest bets. Fact is nobody with talent wants to live in a cold flyover dump with high taxes and stupid people.

Maybe cities like Milwaukee and Detroit should elect Democratic mayors.

Anyone who lumps Milwaukee and Detroit together is an idiot. Milwaukee is actually a really cool city.

I just looked it up, pretty flat GDP over last 5 years. No indication it's on anyone's radar as a 'hot' place.

[Anonymous]

Tampa - lots of NY finance already opening offices there

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at everyone who named dead flyover hellholes that have eye-popping violent crime, double digit BILLIONS in infrastructure time bombs, polluted land, & eye-popping public retiree obligations.

The rich will get richer — already thriving coasts and sun belt are safest bets. Fact is nobody with talent wants to live in a cold flyover dump with high taxes and stupid people.

Maybe cities like Milwaukee and Detroit should elect Democratic mayors.

Anyone who lumps Milwaukee and Detroit together is an idiot. Milwaukee is actually a really cool city.

I just looked it up, pretty flat GDP over last 5 years. No indication it's on anyone's radar as a 'hot' place.

So what? It’s still a great city.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at everyone who named dead flyover hellholes that have eye-popping violent crime, double digit BILLIONS in infrastructure time bombs, polluted land, & eye-popping public retiree obligations.

The rich will get richer — already thriving coasts and sun belt are safest bets. Fact is nobody with talent wants to live in a cold flyover dump with high taxes and stupid people.

Maybe cities like Milwaukee and Detroit should elect Democratic mayors.

Anyone who lumps Milwaukee and Detroit together is an idiot. Milwaukee is actually a really cool city.

I just looked it up, pretty flat GDP over last 5 years. No indication it's on anyone's radar as a 'hot' place.

So what? It’s still a great city.

^^^
And nothing like Detroit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL at everyone who named dead flyover hellholes that have eye-popping violent crime, double digit BILLIONS in infrastructure time bombs, polluted land, & eye-popping public retiree obligations.

The rich will get richer — already thriving coasts and sun belt are safest bets. Fact is nobody with talent wants to live in a cold flyover dump with high taxes and stupid people.

Maybe cities like Milwaukee and Detroit should elect Democratic mayors.

Anyone who lumps Milwaukee and Detroit together is an idiot. Milwaukee is actually a really cool city.

I just looked it up, pretty flat GDP over last 5 years. No indication it's on anyone's radar as a 'hot' place.

So what? It’s still a great city.

^^^
And nothing like Detroit.

With Milwaukee you also get the bonus that Chicago is 1 hr 45 min away for a day trip.

[Anonymous]

Sacramento, CA