Anonymous wrote:
FWIW, this is not what people have reported in this thread about Mclean boys. It has been said on this thread that the girls did not face strong competition in the un-sorted division-less ages. However, this was not the case for the McLean boys. NCSL doesn't publish records for U9 and U10 but in a two-second search of NCSL I see that McLean's top U11 team was 2-6-1, their second team must be in another league, their third team was 2-6-1, and their fourth team was 0-9-0. Their U12s did a lot better and seem, well, appropriately placed: Top team was 6-2-1 in Division 2 of NCSL. The third team had the same record but in Division 5. The fourth team was 4-4-1 in Division 6.
NCSL deserves credit for its new pro/rel division system, which has improved competitiveness. McLean U12 Gold and U12 Silver were in the same division, second to the bottom as U11s. The Gold team finished second and was promoted to a more competitive division, which I think helped spur improvement in their play.
|